Fire Breathing Stroker cams
#1
Safety Car
Thread Starter
Fire Breathing Stroker cams
I was playing the with desktop dyno and came up with some major hp cams this is with open exhaust and headers:
560 hp @ 6500, 514 ft lbs @ 5000 426 ft lbs at 2500
244/260 @ .050 .586/.613 lift 115 LSA 115 IC Solid roller
For slightly less radical:
520 hp @ 6000, 526 ft lbs @ 4500 433 ft lbs at 2000
236/248 @ .050 .586/.613 lift 114 LSA 110 IC solid (?)
A couple notches down:
511 @ 5500 525 ft lbs @ 4500 447 at 2000
230/242 .539/.550 lift 112 LSA 110 IC Hyd Roller
[Modified by AquaMetallic94LT1, 2:11 AM 1/22/2002]
560 hp @ 6500, 514 ft lbs @ 5000 426 ft lbs at 2500
244/260 @ .050 .586/.613 lift 115 LSA 115 IC Solid roller
For slightly less radical:
520 hp @ 6000, 526 ft lbs @ 4500 433 ft lbs at 2000
236/248 @ .050 .586/.613 lift 114 LSA 110 IC solid (?)
A couple notches down:
511 @ 5500 525 ft lbs @ 4500 447 at 2000
230/242 .539/.550 lift 112 LSA 110 IC Hyd Roller
[Modified by AquaMetallic94LT1, 2:11 AM 1/22/2002]
#3
Le Mans Master
Re: Fire Breathing Stroker cams (AquaMetallic94LT1)
Mine is a 240/250 .610/.615 on a 114. Should have some numbers after a little tuning (next few weeks).
#4
Re: Fire Breathing Stroker cams (AquaMetallic94LT1)
The BlueDemon has the CC 306 cam, it's a 396 motor.
The cam specs are (230/244 duration, .544/.576 lift, 112 lobe seperation)
I guess those are flywheel numbers? We've been trying to guess what it would dyno, assuming it will ever run correctly.
The cam specs are (230/244 duration, .544/.576 lift, 112 lobe seperation)
I guess those are flywheel numbers? We've been trying to guess what it would dyno, assuming it will ever run correctly.
#6
Pro
Member Since: Jun 2001
Location: College Station Tx
Posts: 697
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Re: Fire Breathing Stroker cams (AquaMetallic94LT1)
One thing I have noticed about DD2000 is it's propensity for large splits with wide LSA's.
I think it's a good tool for evaluating cam's within a context, but it seems to favor these type of camshafts disproportionately.
Do you know what kind of vacuum at idle you are looking for (at what rpm), or can you give a comparison for the type of idle quality you want (e.g. hotcam on a stock cube motor, etc.)
I think it's a good tool for evaluating cam's within a context, but it seems to favor these type of camshafts disproportionately.
Do you know what kind of vacuum at idle you are looking for (at what rpm), or can you give a comparison for the type of idle quality you want (e.g. hotcam on a stock cube motor, etc.)