At the pumps


BUT this is a Corvette not a Yugo! To obtain maximum performance, premium fuel is RECOMMENDED (not REQUIRED).
Do you want to cheap out or derive the performance the vehicle was designed to deliver?
THAT is the the choice.
If you wanted economy you should have bought a economy car!




RACE ON!!!
BINGO!! Now Here is a man who knows what he is talking aboutYou are a "Corvette not a Yugo" owner. You can display the knowledge and intelligence associated with such ownership and make the appropriate choice, not one based on ego or emotions.
Is there any good reason not to both, "cheap out" AND "derive the performance the vehicle was designed to deliver?"
RACE ON!!!
The Best of Corvette for Corvette Enthusiasts
RACE ON!!!
i run 10.7 compression( afr 195 street heads) and i am experimenting with 89 octane and it runs faster, stronger and better than premium and no pinging at 95 degree weather...
really it is steroids for free, higher volatility fuel, not hampered by slow burn octane additives....
i'll go to 87 on my next fill and see what happens, maybe just half a tank, so i can dilute it if it is awful
Last edited by SmokinRide; Sep 20, 2009 at 10:51 PM.
Listen for knock. Better yet, scan it while driving. If you cannot induce knock counts, try a lower octane gasoline. As suggested, you don't, and shouldn't fill it. If you run into problems, smaller quantities can be easily diluted with higher octane gasoline, if you need to raise the octane of what is in your tank. For test purposes, run the tank fairly low. Add enough of the "test gas" to make it most of the gas in the tank. If you have no problems, add more of the same as you use up the diluted or mixed fuel until you have only the test gas in the tank. If you don't get knock or knock counts, you can repeat the procedure with the next lower grade or octane fuel, until you have determined the least wasteful, most powerful, octane gasoline to buy.
It all depends on your frame of reference. 10.4 is fairly high for a stock production engine. Mine is 9.0:1, so comparatively, yours is high. Next to a 12:1, 13:1, 14:1 etc. race motor yours is mundane.
RACE ON!!!
tuning can smooth things up as well there is just too many variables...
they call it trial and error
For the people who say GM engineers designed the car to run perfect the way it is, alot of their engineering is also to make the almighty dollar. Performance was not their key objective. If it was, don't you think they would have come up with the best exhaust/air filter/ headers possible? The key behind their engineering is based upon min expense with max profit.
As the old adage goes, an ounce of prevention is worth a pound of cure.
Its kind of like do you want to put on cheap parts now only to have them break sooner, or would you rather put on the better quality now to prevent having to constantly fix the same problem?
I personally dont want to have to worry about fixing a pinging, loss of mileage, poorer performance or whatever.

Laura


tuning can smooth things up as well there is just too many variables...
they call it trial and error



RACE ON!!!













