When you click on links to various merchants on this site and make a purchase, this can result in this site earning a commission. Affiliate programs and affiliations include, but are not limited to, the eBay Partner Network.
Here are some pic's of a engine build I am wrapping up for a forum member. 396, 11.1 compression, 4 bolt block, Eagle 4340 crank, Crower sportsman stroker rods, SRP pistons, Crower 221/230 112 LSA hyd roller, AFR 195 Street port heads, Comp ultra gold rockers, Canton oil pan, and it will get a super ram. Still waiting for a couple of parts. It's going in a 1990 C4 6 speed car. He likes to auto X, so I think this should give him a good autocross engine with alot of torque. And should still be able to run the 1/4 fast. Plus it should have great street manners and drivability.
Last edited by tpi 421 vette; Mar 26, 2010 at 02:21 AM.
What drove the cam selection? Desire for really good street manners? Not a critque at all, just surprised at the duration numbers. Also curious what the lift is.
FWIW my cam is 230/236 duration, 113 LSA, .622/.624 lift. I have my idle set at 800rpm and people constantly comment about how smooth it is. If you've been in a C6 Z06, it's close to that from an idle stability perspective. Engine is a 383 with AFR 195 Eliminator Competition ported heads.
Was block fill needed because of heavy notching? Or are those rods lower profile?
No block filler required on this one. I like the Crower stroker rods because they provide alot of clearance. It's a off the shelf cam, not a real small base circle.
In my experiance, block fill isn't need until you get to a 4.0" stroke or more.
Last edited by tpi 421 vette; Mar 26, 2010 at 10:13 PM.
What drove the cam selection? Desire for really good street manners? Not a critque at all, just surprised at the duration numbers. Also curious what the lift is.
FWIW my cam is 230/236 duration, 113 LSA, .622/.624 lift. I have my idle set at 800rpm and people constantly comment about how smooth it is. If you've been in a C6 Z06, it's close to that from an idle stability perspective. Engine is a 383 with AFR 195 Eliminator Competition ported heads.
The cam is .560 and .580 lift with a 1.6 rocker. I wanted something a little more than the tried and proven LPE 219. The super ram is a rpm limited manifold, so you don't need alot more cam than this. This cam should match well with the S.R.
Edit: I also see you have a LT4 intake. That would definately like more duration than this configuration. LT4 is like a miniram, apples and oranges from this. Your cam probably works well with your set up.
Last edited by tpi 421 vette; Mar 26, 2010 at 02:22 PM.
Nice work Jim good choice on rods, too.
He will be able to drive that car anywhere with great manners and make huge torque without having to spin it up high.Should last him a long long time.
I'd like to hear how this one turns out. I'm looking for the right shortblock combination to go with my Super Ram and AFR 195s. I'm considering a Dart SHP 400 block with the LPE219 cam but a GM 396 would be cheaper and should be almost identical in power. It would be nice to know how the cam you selected behaves.
I have used the Crane 222/230 112 LSA 509/528 lift ( 1.5 rocker)cam in alot of engines. That was the first cam I was going to use in this engine. I am very familiar with that cam. I made 416 rwhp in a very mild 421 using that cam. But it is no longer available from Crane since they went out of business and got rebought. I have also used Crower cams and had good luck with their products. Comp cams is always my first choice. But this is pretty close to the Crane 222/230 but has more lift with similar duration numbers. So it's a more aggresive lobe. So I thought I would try this one out. It should match up with a super ram real well.
You don't want to overcam a super ram engine. I have been thru this before. You will make the same peak hp, but you will lose torque. That is my experiance with it. This manifold is a torque manifold, so you want to compliment that.
You don't want a cam that will pull to 6500 when the manifold is done at say 5500-5700. And the more cubes the less rpm it will pull. But it will make boatloads of torque.
Last edited by tpi 421 vette; Mar 27, 2010 at 01:10 AM.
I have used the Crane 222/230 112 LSA 509/528 lift ( 1.5 rocker)cam in alot of engines. That was the first cam I was going to use in this engine. I am very familiar with that cam. I made 416 rwhp in a very mild 421 using that cam. But it is no longer available from Crane since they went out of business and got rebought. I have also used Crower cams and had good luck with their products. Comp cams is always my first choice. But this is pretty close to the Crane 222/230 but has more lift with similar duration numbers. So it's a more aggresive lobe. So I thought I would try this one out. It should match up with a super ram real well.
You don't want to overcam a super ram engine. I have been thru this before. You will make the same peak hp, but you will lose torque. That is my experiance with it. This manifold is a torque manifold, so you want to compliment that.
Looks great Jim ! I'll bet that motor makes upper 400's hp and into the 500's tq !! Will be a "very" responsive motor.
I agree 100% with over-camming a Superram and losing torque with little to no HP gain...... in that SuperRod magazine test where they show all of the intakes on a 383.... thats what they did.... was a big cam they used in that test.
Good to hear from you Beach! Not too many people on here have more experiance with a super ram than you. I have built quite a few engines with them, but you have done more indepth testing than about anybody
I think Kevin will be pleasantly surprised with his 396.
Very impressive build!
Nice and clean and can easily tell you take pride in your work!
A+ on all counts!
Looking forward to seeing how this does once in the car... seems to me he'll be quite happy with it.