4+3 Overdrive modification? (techie) (long)
CARS & PARTS CORVETTE
by Richard F. Newton
In this article he discusses the Doug Nash 4+3 Overdrive unit and describes a modification that allows full manual control in *ALL* four gears.
The problem is, he sort of glosses over the details about how the OD is supposed to work after the modification. For the life of me I can't figure out how his mod would be anything but a *BAD* idea.
Anyway, here's the excerpt:
A Major Modification
I discovered this one by accident. Well, not quite by accident. Actually Chris Petris, who used to build transmissions for the Corvette Challenge, helped me with this. There's a switch on the side of the transmission that tells the computer which gear is engaged. This second gear switch is one of the first things to go bad on the 4+3. The switch is engaged every single time you shift the transmission, whether the overdrive is engaged or not. It's no wonder this is usually the first item to wear out.
When my second gear switch went bad the car simply wouldn't engage overdrive properly. I could hit the switch on the console to turn on the OD and it might not actually engage until I drove some 20 miles down the road. You can imagine how aggravating this was. When Chris and I couldn't locate a replacement switch right away, we simply grounded the switch by running a very short shunt from one terminal to the other. This effectively made the OD a completely mechanical unit, operated only by the interior switch, which in my case is on the console.
Eliminating this switch made all the difference in the world. This was like giving me a new Corvette. This same modification was made to the World Challenge Corvettes. While Chevrolet designed all the electronics to pass the EPA fuel mileage cycle, we simply want a useful transmission. The 4+3 actually works better if you take some of the sophistication out of the system.
What we did was fool the computer into thinking that I'm always in second gear or higher. This switch is on the left side of the transmission, and can be seen easily if you have the car on a lift. This switch moved around a little during the years, but it was always the switch toward the rear. Remove the wiring harness from the switch and hook it out of the way with a tie-wrap. You won't be using this harness. Now make a little jumper wire that fits into the two terminals. You can actually remove the switch from the transmission and make the jumper wire on your workbench. It shouldn't take more than 15 minutes.
Ok, here's my problem with this mod:
If you fool the computer into thinking it is always in second gear or higher then the computer will activate the OD control solenoid which lets hydraulic pressure reach the clutch pack which in turn engages the overdrive. The problem is, there's no hydraulic pressure available to engage the clutch pack until the output shaft starts to spin. It's not spinning when the car is sitting still! So, the way I figure it, the car starts out in 1st gear non-overdrive and as soon as the hydraulic pressure rises to the point where the OD can engage, it shifts into 1st gear w/overdrive.
That transitional period where there is just enough pressure to engage the overdrive is what bothers me. Wouldn't you run the risk of burning up the clutch pack if you accellerate heavily while in this state?
Maybe I'm misunderstanding some fundamental issue here but it seems to me that the 1st gear lockout designed into the 4+3 is there for just this reason.
Anythoughts?
All manner of permutations have been offered, but the consensus of opinion to get a "command" operated OD is to jumper A7 to C8 at the ECM harness, and install a 1985 (On/Off) OD switch.
The OD will stay in whatever mode you left it in; it will operate in any/all gears (even Reverse); and it will be available whenever you want it.
The ECM is completely left out of the circuit.
It's cheap, and you *will* be amazed and delighted at the "new" way your trans performs. :flag
I'm still skeptical because there is no way the overdrive will work from a dead-stop. The output shaft must be spinning before there is any hydraulic pressure to operate the overdrive. Maybe the pressure rises so quickly that it seems like the overdrive is functional in first gear or reverse but I don't buy that yet. I'll agree with you on one point though... I *will* be amazed if this works.
Now for the OD engaging/disengaging. Scorp posted a while back (sorry, don't know when but I printed the post and replies) about the harness connecting to the relay being 'pulled' and causing what I described. I haven't confirmed this on my car yet, but I am 95% positive that this is what I have been experiencing. Since my OD is working in the manner in which I want it to (I don't know why, and if it works, why ask questions?), I have that 1st gear switch sitting doing nothing and it can be had for $20, including shipping. Just drop me an email and I'll mail it to you. I think the benefits of having the OD under the driver's command are self evident.
I wave!
grsteve
In fact, I rarely use OD at all. Occasionally I switch it on while driving, just to keep the parts lubricated. I don't do any freeway driving, maybe 50 miles a year. No use for an overdrive.
This is a recurring thread/question. The archives should have more on it. (Some with my questions!) :D
I race mine in SCCA and constantly go from 4th to o.d. with foot to floor.
Bad idea?
The Best of Corvette for Corvette Enthusiasts
There is no way that the overdrive can work from a dead stop. There is no hydraulic pressure available to engage the overdrive until the output shaft is spinning. Therefore the modification described in the article is most likely bogus and possibly damaging.
What really blows my mind is this paragraph from the article:
As for the tangential issues raise here, I agree that having complete control of the overdrive is a great idea. I also agree that you probably can make the overdrive last much longer if you don't allow it to shift when under heavy acceleration.
But I have a lot of problems with this modification even though it comes from what appears to be a reputable source.
[Modified by LWesthaver, 9:24 PM 4/2/2002]
[Modified by LWesthaver, 10:18 AM 4/3/2002]
David Fulcher
>overdrive *after* 2nd gear is engaged.
You start the car in the morning and the engine is too cold for the OD to engage. You drive down the road in second and the OD shifts in when the engine warms.
>to trick the overdrive into engaging
>while the transmission is in 1st gear?
My question is still why would you want to do that?
I wouldn't stick a screwdriver in my eye either, but if someone reputable stepped forward and declared it to be a great idea I'd probably still want to discuss the matter even though I believed it to be ludicrous. Who knows, maybe there *is* a good reason to stick a screwdriver in my eye. :jester
I had hoped that this thread would shed some light on the inner workings of the 4+3 from a technical standpoint. Instead it sounds like that old joke (Patient) Doc, it really hurts when I do this... (Doc) Then don't do that!
So, my question remains, is it a good idea or a bad idea to trick the overdrive into engaging while the transmission is in 1st gear? From a technical standpoint that is.
[Modified by LWesthaver, 3:04 PM 4/3/2002]
David Fulcher
David Fulcher
Either one is ~$12...Better order a couple; Scorp burns them out fast... :D


















