BLM Datalog Readings
PCMforLess custom Tune
BOSCH III22lbs (upgrading this weekend to 24lbs as per FIC suggestion)
Couple of questions
Understanding that a BLM reading of 128 is optimal and there is a (+-)10 tolerance where the ECM will adjust.
When is the best time to look at BLM values when doing a datalog?
>>Open Loop idle--mine are steady 128
>>Closed loop idle--mine are around 120 on average
>>WOT
>>Normal Driving---mine seem all over the place --anywhere from 114 to 140 at different RPM's
Also...when i swap in the 24 lb injectors what will i have to change in the tune exactly?
Just curious





I prefer +/- 5 on the BLMs BTW, but everybody has their own tolerance level. How are your knock counts?
What exactly needs to be changed in the $32 file to compensate for the larger injectors and more fuel that comes with them.
Jon at FIC suggested i go to the 24's to make up for the longer cranking cold starts with the B3 X 22LB.





WOT is a whole different matter.
I see a couple of places like "Single fire FI Size@40 psig" and "double fire FI Size@40psig"....is that where you are talking about. Do i just change the value to 24 in those 2 locations?





; Block Learn Multiplier cell matrix at L001C: ; ; 700 1200 2000 ; RPM RPM RPM ; | | | ; --------------------- ; | 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | ; ---------------------- 12 gm/sec ; | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | ; ---------------------- 22 gm/sec ; | 8 | 9 | 10 | 11 | ; ---------------------- 34 gm/sec ; | 12 | 13 | 14 | 15 | ; ---------------------
Basically, you want to tune for cells 0, 5, 10 and 15. Those are the ones you'll spend the most time in.
Last edited by Cliff Harris; Dec 7, 2011 at 01:52 AM. Reason: Added note on changed RPM breakpoint.
Will my existing custom tune from PCMforLess with all the changes to spark advance and maf tables for the 22 lb injectors work with the new injectors or should i put the stock BUA9340 bin back in and re-tune from that one?
The Best of Corvette for Corvette Enthusiasts
When i switch injectors, i'll try with both chips (PCM and my Stock file) and post results of the datalogs and any performance issues...hopefully i can get the injectors done tonight...got some free time happening later.
Thanks
BIII 24 lb Injectors swapped in tonight...tightened a few bolts on the intake that were seeping oil---got bored and my friend hollowed out the converter to give it some character.
Started up with no issues with the PCM chip...let in run for 15 mins....took it for a short drive...rough idle in gear...sorta like a mild cam??
Changed chip to stock BUA9340 and altered the injector constant to 24.5lb...same thing...bouncy rough idle. Runs okay while cruising...not nearly as smooth.... as it was with the Bosch III's...might have to change them back...not liking the roughness all of a sudden
Too much fuel??? exhaust flowing freer causing the rumble??? ...almost feels like a miss?
Will do a few data logs tomorrow
Last edited by raiderz; Dec 8, 2011 at 12:04 AM.





Actually looking at the last file Kelley from PCM sent and the latest datalog...The numbers were not too bad but they were still quite eratic
L-TERM and S-TERM bouncing around from lean to rich 120 - 140 with the Bosch III 22lber's.
Update on the rough running issues after the injector swap.
Turns out we left a vacuum line unhooked under the TB...Hooked that back up and the motor smoothed out a touch...still bouncy and rough though.
Took the car for a good hard 1 hour drive and that did the trick...i guess you have to run some fuel through these injectors to wake them up some.
Did a couple of datalogs with both the stock chip (changed injector constant to 24) and the PCM Final tune for the 22lb injectors. The car performed much nicer with the PCM tune, although with both files the car ran rich...For whatever reason the injector constant was at 24.07lbs in the PCM tune for my BIII 22lber's??
The pcm tune BLM counts were on average as follows
S-TERM Counts were very stable and within range most of the time averaged around 124-130 i guess.
L-Term Counts were very low around 108-114 quite often...too rich
What do i have to change in the tune to lean this out and get into balance?? I have posted the latest datamaster scan for someone to have a look at ... http://www.mediafire.com/download.php?brcubpd5v8x7gcp
Thanks in Advance
Sounds too easy?
Your thoughts
Thanks





MAF tables are fairly straightforward to calibrate and specific to given RPM/load areas, so that's why I'd prefer to use those for fueling part throttle.
MAF tables are fairly straightforward to calibrate and specific to given RPM/load areas, so that's why I'd prefer to use those for fueling part throttle.
I will probably try the easy "fix" of raising the injector constant a notch at a time...do some datalogs this Thursday if the weather permits.
I am a little leery of this because im sure doing that will lean out the S-TERM BLM counts which are pretty much okay right now.
Will post results when i log these runs.
It is the L-TERM Counts that are way rich at around 112 on average
Ray





The car is running great right now...no more heavy fuel smell (rich)
Good looking fuel curve on the graph. Idle is a smooth as new too

Cant wait for the
spring weather to run it a little more often and check the fuel mileage.Mileage should be back in line after all this fine tuning
Thanks Again Tim
TTYL
Ray






Shoot me a new log when the weather clears up this spring, we can do a bit better at mid throttle cruise








