'92 LT1 gets warm...then dies
I have run the car through probably 10 cycles of "get HOT, then die". It is like clock work. With the hood closed, one fan cycle and it dumps. With the hood open and cool air, it can take a couple fan cycles, but at any rate heat = no spark. This afternoon, I would hold the throttle so that (when the symptom started) it would run about 2k...the idea being that there would be a great chance for it to stay running. Due to longer "coast time" it did help...but when it finally crapped, the Low res signal had long since vanished, and the hi res stopped counting.
One odd thing is that when it's cold/cool, I still get codes 13, 16, and 42. If I clear the codes, they come back instantly...even though when cold, the thing LOOKS like it's working.
At any rate, I've had every connector off and on multiple times. I'm confident that they're all making a fine connection. I can feel the pins engage the female pins as I slide the connectors together. I've tried wiggling; no diff, hot or cold. It is totally heat related.
The other thing I wondered was if the ECM was being affected by heat. Since the hood closed sped up the symptom. Anyway, with the car cool, I ran the hair dryer on the ECm until it was about 180*F...car started right up and ran fine (until engine got hot again).
One last thing; because I keep getting a code 42, I tested the white wire from the coil to the ESC at the ECM to ground. I got ~1.5 M ohms. Not a short...but there is continuity there. I ohmed the wire from the ECM to the coil and got 0.02 ohms there, and then from the ECM to ground and gor the same ~1.5 M ohms. Any thoughts on that?
At this point, I've drained the coolant and pulled the water pump and balancer. Time for a new distributor, I guess.
The 1.5 M Ohms things, umm.......that is a lot of resistance. I would like it better if it read OL, but I don't think it would cause an issue. Possible but the sun might not come up tomorrow either.
Your scan tool sounds a little screwy if it threw out all those codes! Id call it a fluke on those.
Probably need a new MAT.
The 22 Low res. signal means there is 22m/sec between slits that the low res. sensor picks up.
The high res. signal does count up like you observed and to about what you said.
Sounds like your losing low res. and high res. signals when the unit gets hot. If you lose this ECM cannot run ICM, ICM cannot fire coil=No spark.
44msec*1000=4.416666 sec
4.416666sec*60=265 rotations per min
265rpm of cam*2= 530 rpm on the engine. That cant be right
Factory settings:
Auto - 550 in drive, 650 in park.
Manual - 850.
so what does this 22 number really mean?
Well this isnt relevant at all. just a head scratcher... i tried frequency, i come up with .22Hz at 530rpm, .14hz at 850rpm.
either way, that low resolution signal just needs to be there. if it is=good, if its not=bad
did you try this on the ICM when it was dead?
Well this isnt relevant at all. just a head scratcher... i tried frequency, i come up with .22Hz at 530rpm, .14hz at 850rpm.
either way, that low resolution signal just needs to be there. if it is=good, if its not=bad
did you try this on the ICM when it was dead?

I didn't try Step #7. I wish I had thought of that and tried it but I forgot. Now it's apart, so I can't get it up to temp. I'm GUESSING that with no low res dignal on the scan too, and no high res signal, there wouldn't be a pulse signal at the ICM, but that is...a guess.

I didn't try Step #7. I wish I had thought of that and tried it but I forgot. Now it's apart, so I can't get it up to temp. I'm GUESSING that with no low res dignal on the scan too, and no high res signal, there wouldn't be a pulse signal at the ICM, but that is...a guess.
Can run without High, but NOT low.
From 93 FSM, paraphrasing, Low Res. (4 pulses per crankshaft revolution)
Figure displayed is time difference between the pulses, in m/sec.
I would believe that "000" is an error readout. That could never logically happen under normal operation.
Can run without High, but NOT low.
From 93 FSM, paraphrasing, Low Res. (4 pulses per crankshaft revolution)
Figure displayed is time difference between the pulses, in m/sec.
I would believe that "000" is an error readout. That could never logically happen under normal operation.
Another thing that indicates that there is ZERO crank/cam reference is that right before it dies, the fans will shut off...then if it fires again before coasting to a stop, the fans kick right back on. I'll keep you posted...
Can run without High, but NOT low.
From 93 FSM, paraphrasing, Low Res. (4 pulses per crankshaft revolution)
Figure displayed is time difference between the pulses, in m/sec.
I would believe that "000" is an error readout. That could never logically happen under normal operation.
The Best of Corvette for Corvette Enthusiasts
Well, another day off and it's time for an update:As a former elctro-optical technician from the military, I can tell you heat produced by the engine will not effect these optical sensors. There just isnt any heat sensitivity in those components, unless they were already damaged physically... but then you wouldnt beable to run at all.
Today, I took the distributor off the front of the motor. Took it apart, and reconnected the wire harness to it. I ran my coil wire from my coil to near ground, and then with the Key On, turned the distributor wheel and everything "lit up". The coil wire shot sparks to ground, the injectors fired, the AIR pump started up, fuel pump ran...everything happened that would happen if the engine were running (correctly)...as predicted.
THEN, I took the stripped down unit into the house and threw it in the oven, 275*, for 15 minutes. Came out baked to perfection!
I cruised out to the garage with it in hand (leather gloves) and plugged in the harness, turned the key on, and spun the optical wheel with the screw driver. See video here:NOTHING!.
Dead as a door nail. Everything else in the car at this point is "room temp, EXCEPT the dist casting, and opti unit. For further "proof", I let the unit sit w/o touching it, still connected to the harness, cooling for about 10 minutes...then I spun the wheel again and BANG! Everything "lit up" again; spark, injectors, fuel pump, AIR... I ran the test twice and the point that it begins working again during cool down is roughly 208*F...about the same as on the car.
It would seem that heat can affect the unit. I can prove it on mine clear as day. NOW I feel good about my distributor replacement. I know for certain that is the issue.
Last edited by Tom400CFI; Jun 14, 2015 at 04:32 PM.
Either way, glad you got it figured out. That rust leads me to believe there was some water in there at some point!
I still appreciate your posts and the diagrams are interesting too. It IS a simple piece. It's possible the the problem may not be in the unit, but maybe in the rest of the assy? Who knows.
Yes, it did have water in it at one point.
You can fix cars a lot better than many "professional mechanics" out there. I've seen a whole lot of them, it really is sad. They work on them all day and don't know nothing about them. Just how to turn a wrench.

I only claim to have half a clue.
Got up at 5 AM, got in the car and drove 580 miles to Vegas -evidence that I was pretty confident. Got to Vegas around 2, and then ran the car at the drag track there; ran a slew of 13.6's@103 and managed one 1.9 60' (best yet in this car) which got me a 13.5/103. So it was running...fantastic. Drove back home today. Put 1200 miles on it this weekend. Had the cruise set at 84 mph all the way to Vegas and all teh way back. Got 32.23 mpg going down and 27.11 coming back (AC on) for a 1200 mile average of 29.67 mpg. Not bad. Not bad at all.
The engine runs great, and also, the <2000 RPM high load miss problem that the car has had for years, is now gone. Pulls smooth from any RPM in any gear.
Thing is running great! Thanks to all who contributed to this thread!
Got up at 5 AM, got in the car and drove 580 miles to Vegas -evidence that I was pretty confident. Got to Vegas around 2, and then ran the car at the drag track there; ran a slew of 13.6's@103 and managed one 1.9 60' (best yet in this car) which got me a 13.5/103. So it was running...fantastic. Drove back home today. Put 1200 miles on it this weekend. Had the cruise set at 84 mph all the way to Vegas and all teh way back. Got 32.23 mpg going down and 27.11 coming back (AC on) for a 1200 mile average of 29.67 mpg. Not bad. Not bad at all.
The engine runs great, and also, the <2000 RPM high load miss problem that the car has had for years, is now gone. Pulls smooth from any RPM in any gear.
Thing is running great! Thanks to all who contributed to this thread!
Hey, you should have given us a heads up, we could have met you there.
Sounds like you had the problem figured out all along. Hopefully we will see you soon.....
Got up at 5 AM, got in the car and drove 580 miles to Vegas -evidence that I was pretty confident. Got to Vegas around 2, and then ran the car at the drag track there; ran a slew of 13.6's@103 and managed one 1.9 60' (best yet in this car) which got me a 13.5/103. So it was running...fantastic. Drove back home today. Put 1200 miles on it this weekend. Had the cruise set at 84 mph all the way to Vegas and all teh way back. Got 32.23 mpg going down and 27.11 coming back (AC on) for a 1200 mile average of 29.67 mpg. Not bad. Not bad at all.
The engine runs great, and also, the <2000 RPM high load miss problem that the car has had for years, is now gone. Pulls smooth from any RPM in any gear.
Thing is running great! Thanks to all who contributed to this thread!
I hope to see you soon one way or the other. Nikki Is in Park City today for a job interview...
My '92 starts bucking when it gets heat soaked. I have replaced everything but the opti in hopes of solving the problem. (I used the "routine maintenance" excuse.) I only have about 90K on this opti. I guess I should not complain too much.
















