I'm gonna try a cooling experiment......Input?
Last edited by caddyboy84; Apr 27, 2012 at 11:05 AM.
His PCM has been reprogrammed. This is what you were instructed to do in the first place but opted out of .. remember?
If I were you I would listen to the knowledgeable member's here. On the other hand it looks like you are convinced you idea will work and its reversible right? So try it and let us know how it goes.
His PCM has been reprogrammed. This is what you were instructed to do in the first place but opted out of .. remember?
If I were you I would listen to the knowledgeable member's here. On the other hand it looks like you are convinced you idea will work and its reversible right? So try it and let us know how it goes.
to something else, I'm not looking to damage my car
.
Last edited by caddyboy84; Apr 27, 2012 at 11:42 AM.
I have had switches on past high H/P cars and have forgotten to put them on untill the gauge was in the red. For this very reason I have removed all manual/power radio antennas from cars I've owned
and thats only an antenna. I hate when they break off in the car wash because I'm a idiot that forgot to lower it, I'm also notorious for leaving my lights on..........I think you get the picture
1. you don't need or use shrouding on a pusher fan.
2. Ya say that it doesn't push air against the radiator (but it does), then you go on to say that it's there to provide "some fresh air to be sucked...by the sucker fan". -Which of course draws ALL of it's air across what? The radiator. So which is it. In reality, the pusher fan is there to provide air for the condenser when the A/C is running, car not moving or moving slowly, and it also does move some air across a smallish area of the radiator.
1. "Millions"?? I don't think so. I really don't think "millions" were invested in the design of the electrical circuit for the cooling fans. If that is actually true, please cite the source for that data, because I'm going to co ahead and call that a bogus exaggeration.
2. Using your logic above (with actual, real dollar amounts), by our reasoning, no one should ever mod their car period, right? B/c Millions WERE invested in the C4 platform as a whole...so surely there is no possible way to improve on it right? I mean, it's PERFECT as it sits! Millions! Can't improve upon that! In fact, there are 1000's of way's to improve all areas of C4's and many ways ARE cheap because yes, hard as it may be to believe GM did leave a lot of low hanging fruit.
?? To say that you can't get an ECM controlled car to "live" and "run right under 200*"...that is just completely wrong and not true. There are tons of people here with cars running below 200....and somehow...they do! In fact, my box-stock '92 never runs ABOVE 190, unless I sit still with it running. How can that be? B/c they are also "designed" to run under 200, too.
Last edited by Tom400CFI; Apr 27, 2012 at 12:58 PM.
185 to 200.
The ECM does not even switch to closed loop and go to full run function until 158+-(5)...
Running without a t-stat and mild ambient temps it tries to run at 168-9. Thats the absolute minimum. Any lower on the stock prom/tune and you get fouling and comtaminated oil
Keep in mind there are several reasons that the car NEEDS to run hot.
IT MUST reach temps hot enough to boil out ANY and ALL moisture in the crankcase otherwise a chemical process starts that corrodes the fragile aluminum engine parts...(heads, intake etc) Been there done that..cost way too much to do again.
For longivity the engine needs to be hot enough and lean enough so the lubrication oil does not get washed off the cylinder walls each stoke and end up like a POS carb that only has a 100K life expectancy on the motor. Excess fuel is why carbed motors wear 3 times faster than EFI motors.
Too cool and the plugs foul, carbon builds up inside the engine. More issues later with ping and sludge formation.
So, get it past 158 and get it stable between 185 to 200(even 210) and it'll be happy and you'll be more comfortable.
Keep in mind these were designed to run hot so there is nothing to fear about idling at a stop lite at 235 degrees. Thats what it was designed to do. Harms nothing. The ONLY problem there is a lack of time to react to an emergency...like a blown hose. 235 turns into 265 in about 5 seconds and THAT is the only good reason to lower the normal operating temp...to get a little more cushion to CYA on the road.
I got my motor stable at the above temps under most conditions, by adding a big double row all aluminum radiator, hi-vol water pump, 185 stat, (160 is pointless) and the tune. My motor is enhanced and generates enough heat to get AL Gore to come out of hiding...
but I keep it under control with the listed upgrades. Messing with fans alone is not enough. My fans are managed by the PROM where they are set to come on just before the stat opens. Thats why a 160 is useless...if the stat is open and water is circulating...what good is that if the fans are not cooling the water? 160 is too low for fan and stat opening...so a stable 185 (cruising) is still cool by todays standards and easily achievable. I also upgraded the air dam (big mouth) for maximum fresh air while moving. I wouldn't even need a fan if it were not for stop lite traffic and long delays sitting still. Good luck
Jesus Christ.....praying of course the Almighty voice of whatever...approves of someone elses opinion...
are other opinions permitted here? Guess not if they disagree with uncle tom.
Last edited by leesvet; Apr 27, 2012 at 01:30 PM.
The Best of Corvette for Corvette Enthusiasts
WTF??? Maybe this needs to be re-written in English, but:
1. The fan is not ECM controlled, at all. There is a coolant temp switch that is wired to a relay. Relay turns on the fans.
2. "Higher loads on the ECM?? even though the OP's car doesn't involve the ECM at all, in cars that do...that is the whole POINT of the relay! To separate the electrical load in the circuit, from the "driver" of the circuit! The ECM has no "clue" how much load is on the secondary side of the circuit! How could it?? The Relay isolates it. But in this case the relay is isolating the coolant switch. No ECM involvement here.
None of that really makes any sense.
1. you don't need or use shrouding on a pusher fan.
2. Ya say that it doesn't push air against the radiator (but it does), then you go on to say that it's there to provide "some fresh air to be sucked...by the sucker fan". -Which of course draws ALL of it's air across what? The radiator. So which is it. In reality, the pusher fan is there to provide air for the condenser when the A/C is running, car not moving or moving slowly, and it also does move some air across a smallish area of the radiator.
Again, no ECM involvement here, but even if there were, doing wiring modifications on the secondary side of any relay -ECM would never "know" about it.
Seriously, dude? Really?
1. "Millions"?? I don't think so. I really don't think "millions" were invested in the design of the electrical circuit for the cooling fans. If that is actually true, please cite the source for that data, because I'm going to co ahead and call that a bogus exaggeration.
2. Using your logic above (with actual, real dollar amounts), by our reasoning, no one should ever mod their car period, right? B/c Millions WERE invested in the C4 platform as a whole...so surely there is no possible way to improve on it right? I mean, it's PERFECT as it sits! Millions! Can't improve upon that! In fact, there are 1000's of way's to improve all areas of C4's and many ways ARE cheap because yes, hard as it may be to believe GM did leave a lot of low hanging fruit.
?? To say that you can't get an ECM controlled car to "live" and "run right under 200*"...that is just completely wrong and not true. There are tons of people here with cars running below 200....and somehow...they do! In fact, my box-stock '92 never runs ABOVE 190, unless I sit still with it running. How can that be? B/c they are also "designed" to run under 200, too.


Thank you "Almighty Voice of Reason" for backing me up on this. Some of these responses were beginning to make me doubt what I knew to be true.
WTF??? Maybe this needs to be re-written in English, but: "Higher loads on the ECM?? That is the whole POINT of the relay! To separate the electrical load in the circuit, from the "driver" of the circuit! The ECM has no "clue" how much load is on the secondary side of the circuit! How could it?? The Relay isolates it.
None of that really makes any sense.
1. you don't need or use shrouding on a pusher fan.
2. Ya say that it doesn't push air against the radiator (but it does), then you go on to say that it's there to provide "some fresh air to be sucked...by the sucker fan". -Which of course draws ALL of it's air across what? The radiator. So which is it. In reality, the pusher fan is there to provide air for the condenser when the A/C is running, car not moving or moving slowly, and it also does move some air across a smallish area of the radiator.
Doing wiring modifications on the secondary side of any relay -ECM would never "know" about it.
Seriously, dude? Really?
1. "Millions"?? I don't think so. I really don't think "millions" were invested in the design of the electrical circuit for the cooling fans. If that is actually true, please cite the source for that data, because I'm going to co ahead and call that a bogus exaggeration.
2. Using your logic above (with actual, real dollar amounts), by our reasoning, no one should ever mod their car period, right? B/c Millions WERE invested in the C4 platform as a whole...so surely there is no possible way to improve on it right? I mean, it's PERFECT as it sits! Millions! Can't improve upon that! In fact, there are 1000's of way's to improve all areas of C4's and many ways ARE cheap because yes, hard as it may be to believe GM did leave a lot of low hanging fruit.
?? To say that you can't get an ECM controlled car to "live" and "run right under 200*"...that is just completely wrong and not true. There are tons of people here with cars running below 200....and somehow...they do! In fact, my box-stock '92 never runs ABOVE 190, unless I sit still with it running. How can that be? B/c they are also "designed" to run under 200, too.
If you say so.
Seeing that you want to take the narrow minded view and not see ANY of those statements as being factual even in the figurative sense...
I'll try to clarify in 30 words or less.
You doubt that GM spend more than $50 in the many yrs of C4 developement on that system? The electrical system wasn't developed in a weekend sitting in the garage with a beer...unlike most bubba projects.
ok.
The ECM is not directly in control of fan activation but it is involved in temp mngt which leads to engine mngt, thru many sensors, and other real time data input.
Try on Circuit 935 (the coolant fan control circuit...duh), 992, and 450. (one of which is one of those "mystery" grounds that you do not seem to understand. if you can read the schematic..you'll see them clearly. They ALL go thru the ECM...so the ECM DOES play a roll in the cooling fans. Dude......
BTW..
keeping up with technology will go a long way. 200 degrees is a comfortable number...for YOUR peace of mind. For a contemporary ECM engine..its stone cold. NAME ONE (1) 2013 yr model car that you can find made here that has a normal operating temp of under 200, AND has a warranty of ANY kind...
EFI is why engines now are able to run well past 250,000 miles with even bubba shade tree maint. They are designed to run hot to help maintain that level of performance. Its old school paranoia that keeps people from comprehending the science of todays high-tech control systems. Dude...
I admit that I try to run mine at or just under 200....for MY COMFORT. That is NOT ideal for the engine.
Dude....
Last edited by leesvet; Apr 27, 2012 at 01:35 PM.
Didn't you say you reprogrammed your fans?? So....
The bottom line is that "proper coolant temp" is a personal choice based on criteria, the particular engine combo, and goals. There isn't one number (or even range) that works for everyone.
Last edited by Tom400CFI; Apr 27, 2012 at 01:21 PM.
. I realize that temps around 200 or so burn off impurities in the oil and plan on running no higher that that at idle, in traffic.

Try on Circuit 935 (the coolant fan control circuit...duh), 992, and 450. (one of which is one of those "mystery" grounds that you do not seem to understand. if you can read the schematic..you'll see them clearly. They ALL go thru the ECM...so the ECM DOES play a roll in the cooling fans.
BTW, My CARB'ed boat runs at 150*F. 160 when it gets "hot". Thing is 20 years old this year. According to you, it's got TWO major strikes against it; cool operating temps and a "POS Carb". Yet it still runs absolutely perfect. What engine life am I "missing out on" here?? Lol. 20 years, and still perfect. How long should an engine last?
. I'll be back with my results, I'm just waiting for my tranny cooler to come. Believe it or not, I can't even find a place to get a tranny cooler local, WHAT THE HELL HAPPENED HERE!!! I went to an AutoZone and they didn't even know what the hell I was talking about
. Thank God for E-Bay, and screw everybody who has some kind of dislike for it, if it weren't for E-Bay many of my projects would still be sitting.
. I bought a large tranny cooler and I'm gonna run it alone, I've never seen the point in running it through the radiator as well, seems to defeat the purpose if you ask me.















