C4 Tech/Performance L98 Corvette and LT1 Corvette Technical Info, Internal Engine, External Engine

I'm gonna try a cooling experiment......Input?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Apr 27, 2012 | 10:48 AM
  #21  
caddyboy84's Avatar
caddyboy84
Thread Starter
Burning Brakes
10 Year Member
 
Joined: Nov 2011
Posts: 841
Likes: 1
Default

Originally Posted by craneman61!
I did not change any chip. All I did was put in a 160 thermostat and retuned with a hypertech so the engine would know it had a 160 instead of a 180. This will automatically change your fan settings. Changing your fan settings is the way to run cooler. Just changing the thermostat will not do it. You have to tell the system it now has a 160 instead of a 180. I sat in line at a fast food place yesterday about 10 minutes with outside temps at 86 and it reached 200 even. Running, I was at 175 to 185.
I don't understand, isn't a Hypertech a chip? Maybe I'll give that a try, what else does that chip do, will the car need a re-tune? It's my understanding that my 88 is not reprogramable, it's chip or no chip. So, did you change the chip or not? When I'm moving at highway speed I'm at 175/183, when I'm in terrible stop & go traffic I'll go up to 214/17, I don't like that. I understand that the car is designed to run hot, but thats for emmissions reasons only, it has nothing to do with "closed loop" status for the ECM, heat like this will kill any drive-train and it's unnessesary.

Last edited by caddyboy84; Apr 27, 2012 at 11:05 AM.
Reply
Old Apr 27, 2012 | 11:07 AM
  #22  
ch@0s's Avatar
ch@0s
Le Mans Master
15 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
 
Joined: Oct 2008
Posts: 9,758
Likes: 49
From: Houston Texas
Default

Originally Posted by caddyboy84
Maybe I'll give that a try, what else does that chip do, will the car need a re-tune? When I'm moving at highway speed I'm at 175/183, when I'm in terrible stop & go traffic I'll go up to 214/17, I don't like that. I understand that the car is designed to run hot, but thats for emmissions reasons only, it has nothing to do with "closed loop" status for the ECM, heat like this will kill any drive-train and it's unnessesary.
You cant use "that chip" he has OBDII He used a hypertech reprogrammer.
His PCM has been reprogrammed. This is what you were instructed to do in the first place but opted out of .. remember?

If I were you I would listen to the knowledgeable member's here. On the other hand it looks like you are convinced you idea will work and its reversible right? So try it and let us know how it goes.
Reply
Old Apr 27, 2012 | 11:21 AM
  #23  
caddyboy84's Avatar
caddyboy84
Thread Starter
Burning Brakes
10 Year Member
 
Joined: Nov 2011
Posts: 841
Likes: 1
Default

Originally Posted by ch@0s
You cant use "that chip" he has OBDII He used a hypertech reprogrammer.
His PCM has been reprogrammed. This is what you were instructed to do in the first place but opted out of .. remember?

If I were you I would listen to the knowledgeable member's here. On the other hand it looks like you are convinced you idea will work and its reversible right? So try it and let us know how it goes.
What I really think I need to know is this; Is running in traffic at around 190 or lower gonna send bad information to the ECM? I understand that the car needs to run certain temps to achieve "closed loop" status, I'm just curious about wether or not running too cool is a bad thing? I realize that hooking up the larger fan to run as the secondary is going to keep the car running within the perameters of the stat/fan-switch in traffic, but is that gonna be a bad thing? I'm very open minded and listening to everything everyone here has been nice enough to say,so if the car running too cool under these conditions is a bad thing I'll be more then happy to redirect my energy to something else, I'm not looking to damage my car.
Reply
Old Apr 27, 2012 | 11:34 AM
  #24  
caddyboy84's Avatar
caddyboy84
Thread Starter
Burning Brakes
10 Year Member
 
Joined: Nov 2011
Posts: 841
Likes: 1
Default

This is what I need to know: What is the lowest temp my car can run at under all conditions that is functional for this machine to operate properly? That temp will then be my goal. Do the temp's and the RPM's work in concert in sending signals to the ECM? In other words, does the car know it's at idle and then requires a higher temp and likewise with lower temps at highway speed?

Last edited by caddyboy84; Apr 27, 2012 at 11:42 AM.
Reply
Old Apr 27, 2012 | 11:58 AM
  #25  
ch@0s's Avatar
ch@0s
Le Mans Master
15 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
 
Joined: Oct 2008
Posts: 9,758
Likes: 49
From: Houston Texas
Default

Originally Posted by caddyboy84
This is what I need to know: What is the lowest temp my car can run at under all conditions that is functional for this machine to operate properly? That temp will then be my goal. Do the temp's and the RPM's work in concert in sending signals to the ECM? In other words, does the car know it's at idle and then requires a higher temp and likewise with lower temps at highway speed?
I'm not sure what the "Optimum" would be but considering the stock t stats IIRC are 195 I would assume above 195.
Reply
Old Apr 27, 2012 | 12:36 PM
  #26  
caddyboy84's Avatar
caddyboy84
Thread Starter
Burning Brakes
10 Year Member
 
Joined: Nov 2011
Posts: 841
Likes: 1
Default

Originally Posted by ch@0s
I'm not sure what the "Optimum" would be but considering the stock t stats IIRC are 195 I would assume above 195.
I tend to agree with you on that, based on everything I know and have read in everyone's input, it seems that anything above 200 is absurd. The idea of keeping the temps just under 200 all the time might be tricky with an automatic fan configuration, but too low don't seen to be counterproductive either. Someone here suggested a manual under dash switch but I don't like the idea of such a crucial function relying on my memory I have had switches on past high H/P cars and have forgotten to put them on untill the gauge was in the red. For this very reason I have removed all manual/power radio antennas from cars I've owned and thats only an antenna. I hate when they break off in the car wash because I'm a idiot that forgot to lower it, I'm also notorious for leaving my lights on..........I think you get the picture
Reply
Old Apr 27, 2012 | 12:53 PM
  #27  
Tom400CFI's Avatar
Tom400CFI
Team Owner
Pro Mechanic
20 Year Member
 
Joined: Aug 2004
Posts: 21,543
Likes: 3,216
From: Park City Utah
Default

Originally Posted by leesvet
Its not that simple....
I am sorry but what are you talking about here??? Most of what you posted above is either "alarmist/proffet of doom", or just completely dead, wrong. Where did you come up with your "facts"??

Originally Posted by leesvet
these are ECM "controlled ground" or "power-grounded" circuits that the ECM uses other inputs to make the decision to activate or not. Electrical load goes far beyond the need of the relay that you can see and the effect of any additional loads (higher amperage) on the ECM can be damaging and unpredictable at best.
WTF??? Maybe this needs to be re-written in English, but: "Higher loads on the ECM?? That is the whole POINT of the relay! To separate the electrical load in the circuit, from the "driver" of the circuit! The ECM has no "clue" how much load is on the secondary side of the circuit! How could it?? The Relay isolates it.



Originally Posted by leesvet
There is no real advantage to running the pusher fan on a street car anyway...its the last chance fan thats there to force some air flow against the condensor, NOT the radiator. Its neither shrouded for the radiator or ducted to direct flow to the radiator. It simulates a slight forward motion of the car to allow some fresh air to be sucked thru by the sucker or main fan that IS shrouded for max efficiency.
None of that really makes any sense.
1. you don't need or use shrouding on a pusher fan.
2. Ya say that it doesn't push air against the radiator (but it does), then you go on to say that it's there to provide "some fresh air to be sucked...by the sucker fan". -Which of course draws ALL of it's air across what? The radiator. So which is it. In reality, the pusher fan is there to provide air for the condenser when the A/C is running, car not moving or moving slowly, and it also does move some air across a smallish area of the radiator.



Originally Posted by leesvet
There are dozens of simple inexpensive ways to manage the sucker fan and still allow the ECM to operate as intended. Lower temp switches, programming, even manual ground path circuits that are after ECM input so they do not interfere with the ECM reference voltages.
Doing wiring modifications on the secondary side of any relay -ECM would never "know" about it.



Originally Posted by leesvet
Trying to re-engineer something that had millions of $$ of research is kinda a waste of time.
Seriously, dude? Really?
1. "Millions"?? I don't think so. I really don't think "millions" were invested in the design of the electrical circuit for the cooling fans. If that is actually true, please cite the source for that data, because I'm going to co ahead and call that a bogus exaggeration.
2. Using your logic above (with actual, real dollar amounts), by our reasoning, no one should ever mod their car period, right? B/c Millions WERE invested in the C4 platform as a whole...so surely there is no possible way to improve on it right? I mean, it's PERFECT as it sits! Millions! Can't improve upon that! In fact, there are 1000's of way's to improve all areas of C4's and many ways ARE cheap because yes, hard as it may be to believe GM did leave a lot of low hanging fruit.



Originally Posted by leesvet
These car were designed to run hot, and trying to get a ECM comtrolled car to live at temps under 200 and run right is a falacy.
?? To say that you can't get an ECM controlled car to "live" and "run right under 200*"...that is just completely wrong and not true. There are tons of people here with cars running below 200....and somehow...they do! In fact, my box-stock '92 never runs ABOVE 190, unless I sit still with it running. How can that be? B/c they are also "designed" to run under 200, too.

Last edited by Tom400CFI; Apr 27, 2012 at 12:58 PM.
Reply
Old Apr 27, 2012 | 12:55 PM
  #28  
leesvet's Avatar
leesvet
Safety Car
10 Year Member
 
Joined: Apr 2011
Posts: 3,660
Likes: 22
Default

Originally Posted by caddyboy84
This is what I need to know: What is the lowest temp my car can run at under all conditions that is functional for this machine to operate properly? That temp will then be my goal. Do the temp's and the RPM's work in concert in sending signals to the ECM? In other words, does the car know it's at idle and then requires a higher temp and likewise with lower temps at highway speed?
Its a range...not an exact temp that the stock tune will tolerate and allow good performance, no excess emissions and everything works well.

185 to 200.

The ECM does not even switch to closed loop and go to full run function until 158+-(5)...
Running without a t-stat and mild ambient temps it tries to run at 168-9. Thats the absolute minimum. Any lower on the stock prom/tune and you get fouling and comtaminated oil

Keep in mind there are several reasons that the car NEEDS to run hot.
IT MUST reach temps hot enough to boil out ANY and ALL moisture in the crankcase otherwise a chemical process starts that corrodes the fragile aluminum engine parts...(heads, intake etc) Been there done that..cost way too much to do again.
For longivity the engine needs to be hot enough and lean enough so the lubrication oil does not get washed off the cylinder walls each stoke and end up like a POS carb that only has a 100K life expectancy on the motor. Excess fuel is why carbed motors wear 3 times faster than EFI motors.
Too cool and the plugs foul, carbon builds up inside the engine. More issues later with ping and sludge formation.

So, get it past 158 and get it stable between 185 to 200(even 210) and it'll be happy and you'll be more comfortable.
Keep in mind these were designed to run hot so there is nothing to fear about idling at a stop lite at 235 degrees. Thats what it was designed to do. Harms nothing. The ONLY problem there is a lack of time to react to an emergency...like a blown hose. 235 turns into 265 in about 5 seconds and THAT is the only good reason to lower the normal operating temp...to get a little more cushion to CYA on the road.

I got my motor stable at the above temps under most conditions, by adding a big double row all aluminum radiator, hi-vol water pump, 185 stat, (160 is pointless) and the tune. My motor is enhanced and generates enough heat to get AL Gore to come out of hiding... but I keep it under control with the listed upgrades. Messing with fans alone is not enough. My fans are managed by the PROM where they are set to come on just before the stat opens. Thats why a 160 is useless...if the stat is open and water is circulating...what good is that if the fans are not cooling the water? 160 is too low for fan and stat opening...so a stable 185 (cruising) is still cool by todays standards and easily achievable. I also upgraded the air dam (big mouth) for maximum fresh air while moving. I wouldn't even need a fan if it were not for stop lite traffic and long delays sitting still.

Good luck

Jesus Christ.....praying of course the Almighty voice of whatever...approves of someone elses opinion...
are other opinions permitted here? Guess not if they disagree with uncle tom.

Last edited by leesvet; Apr 27, 2012 at 01:30 PM.
Reply
Corvette Stories

The Best of Corvette for Corvette Enthusiasts

story-0

10 Ugly Corvettes That We Still Kinda Love

 Joe Kucinski
story-1

Top 10 Most Expensive Corvettes Ever Sold on Bring A Trailer

 Brett Foote
story-2

10 Things Every Corvette Owner Needs (2026 Edition)

 Michael S. Palmer
story-3

8 Most "Only Corvette Owners Understand" Quirks and Problems

 Pouria Savadkouei
story-4

10 Reasons the C6 Z06 is Still A Performance Benchmark After 20 Years

 Joe Kucinski
story-5

How Much Horsepower Every Corvette Engine "LOST" in 1972

 Joe Kucinski
story-6

Top 10 DOs and DON'Ts for Protecting Your Convertible Top!

 Michael S. Palmer
story-7

Top 10 Most Explosive Corvettes Ever Made: Power-to-Weight Ratio Ranked!

 Joe Kucinski
story-8

150 hp to 1,250 hp: Every Corvette Generation Compared by the Specs That Matter

 Joe Kucinski
story-9

8 Coolest Corvette Pace Cars (and Replicas) of All Time

 Verdad Gallardo
Old Apr 27, 2012 | 12:59 PM
  #29  
caddyboy84's Avatar
caddyboy84
Thread Starter
Burning Brakes
10 Year Member
 
Joined: Nov 2011
Posts: 841
Likes: 1
Default

Originally Posted by Tom400CFI
I am sorry but what are you talking about here??? Most of what you posted above is either "alarmist/proffet of doom", or just completely dead, wrong. Where did you come up with your "facts"??

WTF??? Maybe this needs to be re-written in English, but:
1. The fan is not ECM controlled, at all. There is a coolant temp switch that is wired to a relay. Relay turns on the fans.
2. "Higher loads on the ECM?? even though the OP's car doesn't involve the ECM at all, in cars that do...that is the whole POINT of the relay! To separate the electrical load in the circuit, from the "driver" of the circuit! The ECM has no "clue" how much load is on the secondary side of the circuit! How could it?? The Relay isolates it. But in this case the relay is isolating the coolant switch. No ECM involvement here.

None of that really makes any sense.
1. you don't need or use shrouding on a pusher fan.
2. Ya say that it doesn't push air against the radiator (but it does), then you go on to say that it's there to provide "some fresh air to be sucked...by the sucker fan". -Which of course draws ALL of it's air across what? The radiator. So which is it. In reality, the pusher fan is there to provide air for the condenser when the A/C is running, car not moving or moving slowly, and it also does move some air across a smallish area of the radiator.



Again, no ECM involvement here, but even if there were, doing wiring modifications on the secondary side of any relay -ECM would never "know" about it.



Seriously, dude? Really?
1. "Millions"?? I don't think so. I really don't think "millions" were invested in the design of the electrical circuit for the cooling fans. If that is actually true, please cite the source for that data, because I'm going to co ahead and call that a bogus exaggeration.
2. Using your logic above (with actual, real dollar amounts), by our reasoning, no one should ever mod their car period, right? B/c Millions WERE invested in the C4 platform as a whole...so surely there is no possible way to improve on it right? I mean, it's PERFECT as it sits! Millions! Can't improve upon that! In fact, there are 1000's of way's to improve all areas of C4's and many ways ARE cheap because yes, hard as it may be to believe GM did leave a lot of low hanging fruit.



?? To say that you can't get an ECM controlled car to "live" and "run right under 200*"...that is just completely wrong and not true. There are tons of people here with cars running below 200....and somehow...they do! In fact, my box-stock '92 never runs ABOVE 190, unless I sit still with it running. How can that be? B/c they are also "designed" to run under 200, too.
Thank you "Almighty Voice of Reason" for backing me up on this. Some of these responses were beginning to make me doubt what I knew to be true.
Reply
Old Apr 27, 2012 | 01:05 PM
  #30  
leesvet's Avatar
leesvet
Safety Car
10 Year Member
 
Joined: Apr 2011
Posts: 3,660
Likes: 22
Default

Originally Posted by Tom400CFI
I am sorry but what are you talking about here??? Most of what you posted above is either "alarmist/proffet of doom", or just completely dead, wrong. Where did you come up with your "facts"??

WTF??? Maybe this needs to be re-written in English, but: "Higher loads on the ECM?? That is the whole POINT of the relay! To separate the electrical load in the circuit, from the "driver" of the circuit! The ECM has no "clue" how much load is on the secondary side of the circuit! How could it?? The Relay isolates it.



None of that really makes any sense.
1. you don't need or use shrouding on a pusher fan.
2. Ya say that it doesn't push air against the radiator (but it does), then you go on to say that it's there to provide "some fresh air to be sucked...by the sucker fan". -Which of course draws ALL of it's air across what? The radiator. So which is it. In reality, the pusher fan is there to provide air for the condenser when the A/C is running, car not moving or moving slowly, and it also does move some air across a smallish area of the radiator.



Doing wiring modifications on the secondary side of any relay -ECM would never "know" about it.



Seriously, dude? Really?
1. "Millions"?? I don't think so. I really don't think "millions" were invested in the design of the electrical circuit for the cooling fans. If that is actually true, please cite the source for that data, because I'm going to co ahead and call that a bogus exaggeration.
2. Using your logic above (with actual, real dollar amounts), by our reasoning, no one should ever mod their car period, right? B/c Millions WERE invested in the C4 platform as a whole...so surely there is no possible way to improve on it right? I mean, it's PERFECT as it sits! Millions! Can't improve upon that! In fact, there are 1000's of way's to improve all areas of C4's and many ways ARE cheap because yes, hard as it may be to believe GM did leave a lot of low hanging fruit.



?? To say that you can't get an ECM controlled car to "live" and "run right under 200*"...that is just completely wrong and not true. There are tons of people here with cars running below 200....and somehow...they do! In fact, my box-stock '92 never runs ABOVE 190, unless I sit still with it running. How can that be? B/c they are also "designed" to run under 200, too.
OK.
If you say so.

Seeing that you want to take the narrow minded view and not see ANY of those statements as being factual even in the figurative sense...
I'll try to clarify in 30 words or less.

You doubt that GM spend more than $50 in the many yrs of C4 developement on that system? The electrical system wasn't developed in a weekend sitting in the garage with a beer...unlike most bubba projects.
ok.

The ECM is not directly in control of fan activation but it is involved in temp mngt which leads to engine mngt, thru many sensors, and other real time data input.
Try on Circuit 935 (the coolant fan control circuit...duh), 992, and 450. (one of which is one of those "mystery" grounds that you do not seem to understand. if you can read the schematic..you'll see them clearly. They ALL go thru the ECM...so the ECM DOES play a roll in the cooling fans. Dude......
BTW..
keeping up with technology will go a long way. 200 degrees is a comfortable number...for YOUR peace of mind. For a contemporary ECM engine..its stone cold. NAME ONE (1) 2013 yr model car that you can find made here that has a normal operating temp of under 200, AND has a warranty of ANY kind...
EFI is why engines now are able to run well past 250,000 miles with even bubba shade tree maint. They are designed to run hot to help maintain that level of performance. Its old school paranoia that keeps people from comprehending the science of todays high-tech control systems. Dude...

I admit that I try to run mine at or just under 200....for MY COMFORT. That is NOT ideal for the engine.
Dude....

Last edited by leesvet; Apr 27, 2012 at 01:35 PM.
Reply
Old Apr 27, 2012 | 01:16 PM
  #31  
Tom400CFI's Avatar
Tom400CFI
Team Owner
Pro Mechanic
20 Year Member
 
Joined: Aug 2004
Posts: 21,543
Likes: 3,216
From: Park City Utah
Default

I do. :Thumbs:
Originally Posted by leesvet
The ECM does not even switch to closed loop and go to full run function until 158+
Varies, depending on car and year.


Originally Posted by leesvet
Keep in mind there are several reasons that the car NEEDS to run hot. IT MUST reach temps hot enough to boil out ANY and ALL moisture in the crankcase otherwise a chemical process starts that corrodes the fragile aluminum engine parts...(heads, intake etc)
Nah, that's not true either. Are you asserting that NO evaporation of fuel or water occurs below 169*F??


Originally Posted by leesvet
For longivity the engine needs to be hot enough and lean enough so the lubrication does not get washed off the cylinder walls each stoke and end up like a POS carb that only has a 100K life expectancy on the motor. Excess fuel is why carbed motors wear out go to hell 3 times faster than EFI motors.
You're going to have to cite your data source again here. I had a carb'ed car that I sold at 200k still running perfect. The buyer sold it at 230k. Going by your statement of "fact", EFI motors last 750k?


Originally Posted by leesvet
Too cool and the plugs foul, carbon builds up inside the engine. More issues later with ping and sludge formation.
sludge and carbon build up are actually cause by EXCESSIVE heat in the oil, or poor oil's inability to deal with heat. Plugs won't foul directly b/c of coolant temp. That is not true.



Originally Posted by leesvet
235 turns into 265 in about 5 seconds and THAT is the only good reason to lower the normal operating temp
Nope. That is not the only reason. There are other reasons why someone would choose to have their car operate at lower temperatures.


Originally Posted by leesvet
My fans are managed by the PROM where they are set to come on about the same time the stat opens.
So youre fans are running virtually all the time?


Originally Posted by leesvet
Thats why a 160 is useless...if the stat is open and water is circulating...what good is that if the fans are not cooling the water?
None if the car is stopped/stationary, but if it's moving down the road, obviously there is a 20* difference. For starters.


Originally Posted by leesvet
160 is too low for fan and stat opening
Didn't you say you reprogrammed your fans?? So....


The bottom line is that "proper coolant temp" is a personal choice based on criteria, the particular engine combo, and goals. There isn't one number (or even range) that works for everyone.

Last edited by Tom400CFI; Apr 27, 2012 at 01:21 PM.
Reply
Old Apr 27, 2012 | 01:17 PM
  #32  
caddyboy84's Avatar
caddyboy84
Thread Starter
Burning Brakes
10 Year Member
 
Joined: Nov 2011
Posts: 841
Likes: 1
Default

Originally Posted by leesvet
OK.
If you say so.
Dude, I was saying the whole time that the ECM has nothing to do with switching the fan designations and there would be no difference in the signals sent. To think that wouldn't make sense, doing anything before the relay would be a different story. I think too many people need to be spoon-fed information instead of using common sense and my common sense told me that there shouldnt've been any problem with rewirering those fans. I was just a little in the dark about wether or not lower temps were good or bad but you just gave me the answer I've been waiting for. Anything above 160 or so is fine, Thank you. I realize that temps around 200 or so burn off impurities in the oil and plan on running no higher that that at idle, in traffic.
Reply
Old Apr 27, 2012 | 02:00 PM
  #33  
Tom400CFI's Avatar
Tom400CFI
Team Owner
Pro Mechanic
20 Year Member
 
Joined: Aug 2004
Posts: 21,543
Likes: 3,216
From: Park City Utah
Default

Originally Posted by leesvet
Seeing that you want to take the narrow minded view
I am norrow minded?? You're the one stating opinions as "fact" i.e. "only one right way". I am saying proper op temp is a personal choice based on factors/goals/criteria...you're saying "this is it -anything else is wrong". *I* am closed minded??

Originally Posted by leesvet
not see ANY of those statements as being factual even in the figurative sense...
Right. "Factual...in a figurative sense". What ever THAT means. Sorry I "missed" that you were being figurative, with your "facts". People come here looking for good advice. Facts, where possible. Just state your opinions as opinions, and facts (that you can back up) as facts.


Originally Posted by leesvet
You doubt that GM spend more than $50 in the many yrs of C4 developement on that system? The electrical system wasn't developed in a weekend sitting in the garage with a beer...unlike most bubba projects.
I'm sorry...where did I say they spent $50 or less on the electrical system? You'll have to quote where I said that please. But let's be honest shall we? The FAN CIRCUITS are not rocket science folks. Didn't take "millions" to develop that is for sure, and yes, "bubba" systems work just as well. How do I know? I've built several that worked perfectly. Couple relays, couple coolant switches, some wire, weather pack connectors, loom...NOT rocket science.


Originally Posted by leesvet
The ECM is not directly in control of fan activation but it is involved in temp mngt which leads to engine mngt, thru many sensors, and other real time data input.
Try on Circuit 935 (the coolant fan control circuit...duh), 992, and 450. (one of which is one of those "mystery" grounds that you do not seem to understand. if you can read the schematic..you'll see them clearly. They ALL go thru the ECM...so the ECM DOES play a roll in the cooling fans.
OF course it does, in stock form. However, there are many way's to manipulate control of the fans w/o affecting the ECM in ANY NEGATIVE WAY. You make it seem like that is not the case and that is misleading and untrue.


Originally Posted by leesvet
keeping up with technology will go a long way. 200 degrees is a comfortable number...for YOUR peace of mind. For a contemporary ECM engine..its stone cold. NAME ONE (1) 2013 yr model car that you can find made here that has a normal operating temp of under 200, AND has a warranty of ANY kind...
Really? Our '05 Caddy runs at 190. Bone, box stock. How contemporary are we talknig here, b/c the OP's car is an '88. My '06 C6 ran at 186. Maybe cars in 2012/13 run hotter (no, they don't).


Originally Posted by leesvet
EFI is why engines now are able to run well past 250,000 miles with even bubba shade tree maint. They are designed to run hot to help maintain that level of performance. Its old school paranoia that keeps people from comprehending the science of todays high-tech control systems. Dude...
Again....wrong. Today's OEM set temps are there for emissions and fuel economy criteria that the OEM's have to meet...that WE DON'T. Our criteria is often different than the OE's.


Originally Posted by leesvet
I admit that I try to run mine at or just under 200....for MY COMFORT. That is NOT ideal for the engine.
But it's ideal for you and your engine. Right? Personal choice based on criteria, goals, etc. Just as I stated above.

BTW, My CARB'ed boat runs at 150*F. 160 when it gets "hot". Thing is 20 years old this year. According to you, it's got TWO major strikes against it; cool operating temps and a "POS Carb". Yet it still runs absolutely perfect. What engine life am I "missing out on" here?? Lol. 20 years, and still perfect. How long should an engine last?
Reply
Old Apr 27, 2012 | 04:11 PM
  #34  
caddyboy84's Avatar
caddyboy84
Thread Starter
Burning Brakes
10 Year Member
 
Joined: Nov 2011
Posts: 841
Likes: 1
Default

Well, aside from all the "bickering", I was able to filter-out the useless information and get the answers I needed, so my conclusion is; I'm gonna give my fan idea a go and see what happens. I'll be back with my results, I'm just waiting for my tranny cooler to come. Believe it or not, I can't even find a place to get a tranny cooler local, WHAT THE HELL HAPPENED HERE!!! I went to an AutoZone and they didn't even know what the hell I was talking about. Thank God for E-Bay, and screw everybody who has some kind of dislike for it, if it weren't for E-Bay many of my projects would still be sitting.
Reply
Old Apr 27, 2012 | 06:39 PM
  #35  
jhammons01's Avatar
jhammons01
Le Mans Master
10 Year Member
 
Joined: May 2006
Posts: 9,226
Likes: 9
From: Irvine Ca
Default

Did you have the Radiator boiled out yet?
Reply
Old Apr 27, 2012 | 06:50 PM
  #36  
caddyboy84's Avatar
caddyboy84
Thread Starter
Burning Brakes
10 Year Member
 
Joined: Nov 2011
Posts: 841
Likes: 1
Default

Originally Posted by jhammons01
Did you have the Radiator boiled out yet?
No, I'm gonna get that done the day I rip everything apart. It looks pretty clean and new, it's also flowing pretty good too. I'll have it done anyway, makes no sense having it out and not doing that. I bought a large tranny cooler and I'm gonna run it alone, I've never seen the point in running it through the radiator as well, seems to defeat the purpose if you ask me.
Reply
Old Apr 27, 2012 | 06:51 PM
  #37  
nutz4c4's Avatar
nutz4c4
Melting Slicks
 
Joined: Nov 2005
Posts: 2,736
Likes: 0
From: WAY UPSTATE NY
Default

Reply




All times are GMT -4. The time now is 10:30 AM.

story-0
10 Ugly Corvettes That We Still Kinda Love

Slideshow: 10 ugly Corvettes that we still kinda love.

By Joe Kucinski | 2026-06-03 10:34:17


VIEW MORE
story-1
Top 10 Most Expensive Corvettes Ever Sold on Bring A Trailer

A lot of money has changed hands at the online auction house over the years.

By Brett Foote | 2026-06-03 10:21:50


VIEW MORE
story-2
10 Things Every Corvette Owner Needs (2026 Edition)

Slideshow: 10 great gifts Corvette enthusiasts actually want for Father's Day!

By Michael S. Palmer | 2026-06-03 15:43:40


VIEW MORE
story-3
8 Most "Only Corvette Owners Understand" Quirks and Problems

Slideshow: These are the quirks, annoyances, and oddly lovable problems that every Corvette owner eventually learns to live with.

By Pouria Savadkouei | 2026-05-28 09:31:39


VIEW MORE
story-4
10 Reasons the C6 Z06 is Still A Performance Benchmark After 20 Years

Slideshow: 10 reasons why the C6 Z06 is still a performance benchmark after 20 years.

By Joe Kucinski | 2026-05-27 17:20:09


VIEW MORE
story-5
How Much Horsepower Every Corvette Engine "LOST" in 1972

Slideshow: How much horsepower every Corvette engine lost in 1972.

By Joe Kucinski | 2026-05-27 16:54:53


VIEW MORE
story-6
Top 10 DOs and DON'Ts for Protecting Your Convertible Top!

Slideshow: How to Protect A Convertible Top: 10 DOs & DON'Ts

By Michael S. Palmer | 2026-04-03 00:00:00


VIEW MORE
story-7
Top 10 Most Explosive Corvettes Ever Made: Power-to-Weight Ratio Ranked!

Slideshow: The 10 most explosive Corvettes ever built based on power-to-weight ratio.

By Joe Kucinski | 2026-05-20 07:23:03


VIEW MORE
story-8
150 hp to 1,250 hp: Every Corvette Generation Compared by the Specs That Matter

Slideshow: From C1 to C8 we compare every Corvette generation by the numbers.

By Joe Kucinski | 2026-05-12 16:54:12


VIEW MORE
story-9
8 Coolest Corvette Pace Cars (and Replicas) of All Time

Slideshow: Some Corvette pace cars became collectible legends, while others perfectly captured the look and attitude of their era.

By Verdad Gallardo | 2026-05-11 09:50:51


VIEW MORE