When you click on links to various merchants on this site and make a purchase, this can result in this site earning a commission. Affiliate programs and affiliations include, but are not limited to, the eBay Partner Network.
It seems awhile back there was a post asking about the difference in weight between the heads. Well I have a set of scales that I use for selling freon and trust me they are accurate.
But at any rate here are the weights of the 1057 head (AFR LT1 210cc 65 cc chambers) 27lbs 7oz. The stock ported head weighed 23lbs 5.5oz.
So the difference in weight is only 8lbs 3oz. for the set. And actually compared to stock unported head, would probably be slightly less then that.
It seems awhile back there was a post asking about the difference in weight between the heads. Well I have a set of scales that I use for selling freon and trust me they are accurate.
But at any rate here are the weights of the 1057 head (AFR LT1 210cc 65 cc chambers) 27lbs 7oz. The stock ported head weighed 23lbs 5.5oz.
So the difference in weight is only 8lbs 3oz. for the set. And actually compared to stock unported head, would probably be slightly less then that.
every ounce of weight counts. 8 lbs might not seem like a lot, but add 8 lbs for that, 10 extra lbs for your 3" exhaust, 40 to 60 extra lbs for your rollcage, and stuff adds up.
Id like to see better C4 options for weight reduction.
Ex. a titanium exhaust, better availability (and cheaper) carbon fiber hoods / body panels, maybe AFR should make the heads out of titanium or something.
When your goals are to compete/ beat the latest c5/c6 then you need everything you can get.
As for me dieting, its not an option. There'd be nothing left of me !
Wholly crap man, have you figured the horsepower gain with the AFR's vs the weight of the stock ***** heads. You keep the stock heads, port the crap out of them, spend a fortune for a few extra horsepower, then line up with a car with AFR's...Then see what the 8 lbs get you.
Oh Im not complaining about the weight difference. In fact, it makes for a much stronger head. (IMO) Its just I remember someone questioned the difference on here once, I had both heads sitting in front of me and a very accurate set of scales to weigh them with. So I posted my results.
every ounce of weight counts. 8 lbs might not seem like a lot, but add 8 lbs for that, 10 extra lbs for your 3" exhaust, 40 to 60 extra lbs for your rollcage, and stuff adds up.
Id like to see better C4 options for weight reduction.
Ex. a titanium exhaust, better availability (and cheaper) carbon fiber hoods / body panels, maybe AFR should make the heads out of titanium or something.
When your goals are to compete/ beat the latest c5/c6 then you need everything you can get.
As for me dieting, its not an option. There'd be nothing left of me !
I assume you have no passenger seat carpets radio heater AC spare tire wipers washers headlights or motors carbon fiber drivers seat with a fixed track lightweight wheels and brakes etc will not bore everyone by going on and on. Personally I will trade 8 lbs for 50 hp and 50 ft lbs.
The lightweight wheels tires and brakes are a bigger deal beyond just the weight, there is also the pwer lost spinning them up to speed.
Dave
It seems awhile back there was a post asking about the difference in weight between the heads. Well I have a set of scales that I use for selling freon and trust me they are accurate.
But at any rate here are the weights of the 1057 head (AFR LT1 210cc 65 cc chambers) 27lbs 7oz. The stock ported head weighed 23lbs 5.5oz.
So the difference in weight is only 8lbs 3oz. for the set. And actually compared to stock unported head, would probably be slightly less then that.
Did the weight reduction exercise on my 94 a few years ago--Plexan, lite battery, etc. etc. Picked up more MPH. Went from 1/8 of tank to 3/4 of a tank of gas, adding about 70 LBS, and lowered my 60' and ET. Did give up 1.5 MPH though.
I assume you have no passenger seat carpets radio heater AC spare tire wipers washers headlights or motors carbon fiber drivers seat with a fixed track lightweight wheels and brakes etc will not bore everyone by going on and on. Personally I will trade 8 lbs for 50 hp and 50 ft lbs.
The lightweight wheels tires and brakes are a bigger deal beyond just the weight, there is also the pwer lost spinning them up to speed.
Dave
yes i agree they are. Thats why I run baer eradispeed 2 piece 13" j55 rotors. I could have done thicker, heavier C5 rotors, but didnt want the unsprung weight for the reasons you state.
I also run the 96 grandsport GS wheels (lightweight forged aluminum) w/ P315/35R17 out back.
Ive resisted the vanity urges of 18", 19", wheels etc. for better wheel 'looks'. I am a tire engineer and know that the extra inch or two in size increases wheel weight and also DECREASES contact patch (side to side is the same, but front to rear is decreased with say... a P315/30R18 vs. a P315/35R17 when loaded during a launch-type situation.
I also dump the passenger seat for a quick 40 lb weight loss.
Funny you mention the 8lbs weight hit. Yes, I did put on AFR heads this spring (just fired it up yesterday). I will let everyone here now if those 8 lbs were worth it;
Comp ported afr 195 cc heads from a guy here on the forum....for an amazing price, with an amazing fast build time!