C4 Tech/Performance L98 Corvette and LT1 Corvette Technical Info, Internal Engine, External Engine

Solid roller cam for 350?

Old Aug 12, 2012 | 04:43 AM
  #1  
Samcro92's Avatar
Samcro92
Thread Starter
Cruising
10 Year Member
 
Joined: Feb 2012
Posts: 14
Likes: 0
From: Bartlett, IL
Default Solid roller cam for 350?

I'm looking for a solid roller cam for my 1985 corvette. The other mods I'm gonna put on are; vortex intake system, 52mm throttle body, mini ram intake manifold and fuel rail, polished engine pulleys, new ecu, long tube headers to a 3" y pipe. Any info would help. What would be the best?
Reply
Old Aug 12, 2012 | 08:34 AM
  #2  
Black89Z51's Avatar
Black89Z51
Suckin' gas, haulin' ass.
Supporting Lifetime
 
Joined: Apr 2010
Posts: 1,100
Likes: 8
From: Newport News Virginia
Default

Unless you are spinning it to the moon or have crazy ramp rates, stick to hydraulic roller.

It doesn't sound like you are doing anything to internals so I'm going to assume high rpms are not going to happen.
Reply
Old Aug 12, 2012 | 10:03 AM
  #3  
cv67's Avatar
cv67
Team Owner
15 Year Member
 
Joined: Oct 2004
Posts: 81,241
Likes: 3,063
From: altered state
St. Jude Donor '05
Default

Add a 195 comp port afr head 11:1 compression and something in the 236/242 duration at .050 it will rip. Love solid rollers.

If you arent going to turn it over 6200 a HR may be your best bet. They are both good
Reply
Old Aug 12, 2012 | 02:18 PM
  #4  
1fatcat's Avatar
1fatcat
Advanced
 
Joined: Jun 2012
Posts: 89
Likes: 3
From: Zimmerman MN
Default

Is there a down side to solids if you don't need them? Are they noisy and require periodic adjustment?
Reply
Old Aug 12, 2012 | 02:46 PM
  #5  
383vett's Avatar
383vett
Race Director
20 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
 
Joined: Apr 2003
Posts: 17,700
Likes: 1,667
From: moraga ca
Default

Originally Posted by 1fatcat
Is there a down side to solids if you don't need them? Are they noisy and require periodic adjustment?
Just as you said, noisy, adjustments and tougher or valvetrain parts because of the constant pounding. Things don't last as long.
Reply
Old Aug 13, 2012 | 03:10 PM
  #6  
Crepitus's Avatar
Crepitus
Drifting
15 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
 
Joined: Mar 2009
Posts: 1,253
Likes: 4
From: East Wenatchee (2hours from n e where) WA
Default

Originally Posted by 383vett
Just as you said, noisy, adjustments and tougher or valvetrain parts because of the constant pounding. Things don't last as long.
If a hyd roller will do the job use it, it will last a lot longer. Mech rollers dont offer nearly as many street / strip grinds. They typically use very agressive lobe profiles and are intended for highly stressed engines.

Last edited by Crepitus; Aug 13, 2012 at 03:15 PM.
Reply
Old Aug 19, 2012 | 04:15 PM
  #7  
Hot Rod Roy's Avatar
Hot Rod Roy
Safety Car
15 Year Member
 
Joined: Sep 2004
Posts: 3,953
Likes: 550
From: Mission Viejo CA
Default

Long tube headers aren't intended for high RPM engines.

Reply
Old Aug 19, 2012 | 04:48 PM
  #8  
tpi 421 vette's Avatar
tpi 421 vette
Melting Slicks
20 Year Member
Active Streak: 30 Days
Photogenic
Top Answer: 1
 
Joined: Mar 2002
Posts: 3,108
Likes: 126
From: S.L.C. UT
Default

Originally Posted by Hot Rod Roy
Long tube headers aren't intended for high RPM engines.

I disagree, long tube headers are the way to go for any performance engine. They will out perform any shorty or exhaust manifold. The more power you make the more a long tube will help you.
Reply
Old Aug 19, 2012 | 07:47 PM
  #9  
wilcar's Avatar
wilcar
Drifting
15 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
 
Joined: Mar 2006
Posts: 1,263
Likes: 188
From: Wabasha Mn
Default

I have used several solid flat tappet cams over the years and if you use poly locks on the rocker arms you really do not need to adjust them that much unless you are tuning the engine by changing lash. As long as you do not run too high of spring pressure and not too much lift a solid lifter cam will last a long time. GM's old solid lifter cams used the same springs as grandma's 283 nova. I used the good old Duntov 097 solid cam in my 327 powered 57 Chevy and hardly ever adjusted my valves and it would still run to 6200 with no problems. I think for a mild street engine a flat tappet cam is still fine if you break them in right and do not go too wild on lift, spring pressure, and lobe profiles.
Reply
Old Aug 19, 2012 | 09:54 PM
  #10  
383vett's Avatar
383vett
Race Director
20 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
 
Joined: Apr 2003
Posts: 17,700
Likes: 1,667
From: moraga ca
Default

Why would you go with a mild flat tappet solid lifter cam? A roller cam will outperform a flat tappet cam because it will open and close the valve quicker. A solid lifter normally is used for high rpm applications revs are important. For a mild street cam, it is totally unnecessary unless you like the sound.
Reply
Old Aug 20, 2012 | 12:04 AM
  #11  
motion vega's Avatar
motion vega
Advanced
 
Joined: Feb 2010
Posts: 92
Likes: 0
From: genoa il
Default

deffinitly hydro roller, even a used take out of a zz4 crate motor would be good. thats what i use in my street stock and its got awsome power with a 500 cfm 2 bbl and ported manifolds, would be even better with headers. plus its cheap, i got the entire valvetrain off ebay for 200.
Reply

Get notified of new replies

To Solid roller cam for 350?



Thread Tools
Search this Thread

All times are GMT -4. The time now is 03:34 PM.