300hp L98
original 350 engine with TPIS ZZ9x cam
1)1:6 RR's
Massively ported Edelbrock Intake and SLP runner dividers cut down deep and massively ported to intake. Ported Plenum to runners.
2)Ported heads
3) 1.75 Long tube headers
4)58 mm throttle body
5)hollowed out cat
6)30lb injectors
7) MSD 6AL
8) Modified MAF.
9) Auto with 3.73 gears.
Still cheaper than what parts cost for my wife's 96GTS viper!
Last edited by TommyFox; Mar 21, 2013 at 11:02 PM.

Cant race dynos
Cant race a flowbench.
<220whp=<250chp. So no...no where NEAR 300. Not even close at all. Also, you "got to 400 with only a few more things done"? Have you confirmed that?? I'm doubting that your at 400, wheel OR crank...
<220whp=<250chp. So no...no where NEAR 300. Not even close at all. Also, you "got to 400 with only a few more things done"? Have you confirmed that?? I'm doubting that your at 400, wheel OR crank...
I got 224 on a stock internally at least 89
but that was with some intake base porting a catback and a few other bolt ons.Without any probably would have been low 200s at best.
The Best of Corvette for Corvette Enthusiasts
I'm NOT saying that 300 IS what they have...jesus...I guess a figurative statement just won;t be understood by some that just want to attack a statement they do not agree with..
BUT, IF your semi stock engine produces 220 @ the wheels, then at the crank it IS actually closer to 300 than it is to 200 because there will be closer to 250+ on the crank..
AGAIN<-----this is a figurative statement. Not meant to be dead nuts 100% right on accurate to the 9th decimal.
And Yes Tom, I did see 400 with a few things done. 400 RWHP.
Major porting & head work. Cam. Exhaust. TB, Tune,increase in CI (bored 377?), big inj, and whatever else was available at that time around 2001. Balanced of course,
Ran out of funds at around 10K...Needed another $2000 for the remaining goodies on my wish list. oh well. I forget what the torque ended up being but it was NOT nearly as big an increase as HP was. In fact, it was about half what HP grew. Opening up the top of the power band is a recipe for relocating torque. Anytime you alter the power band up high you trade away down low.
That build did yeild 400 hp when finished. That was a great engine and I would build another just like it if I could. That particular engine is no longer together with those parts so its somewhat less powerful now, but it could be made to do that again, just as ANY engine can be built with a PLAN, some time and thought. Mostly......money.
Since the point of this thread keeps getting lost, or forgotten so some bashing can be done...

but I STILL say & believe that 300 at the wheels is easy. Too many others have got there and can confirm that its not as hard as some of you make it out to be. Maybe because some folks spent LOTS more money and didn;t get the BIG numbers they hoped for when they read the hype on the box..maybe because some still believe that EFI is the devil. Who cares....what I DO know is that 300hp ain;t a big deal. Its easy. Its where these C4 started off seems to be the area thats disputed. Thats actually pretty unimportant too...200...240...the goal is 300. Well within reach of ANY 350ci V8 sbc. EFI or carb.
BUT, IF your semi stock engine produces 220 @ the wheels, then at the crank it IS actually closer to 300 than it is to 200 because there will be closer to 250+ on the crank..
"regarding the rwhp.....I've never seen a stock or near stock C4 dyno under 200 at the wheels... so that leads me to believe that they must be closer to 300 at the crank than 200"
While 251hp (as an example) IS closer to 300 than 200....your lead-in, and statement above are misleading. It SOUNDED like you were implying that a stock L98 is close to/almost/about 300 chp and it's not. Not even close, even in it's best ('91 manual w/"perf. exhaust), iteration. But MOST stock L98's DON'T dyno 220 RWHP. MOST, dyno closer to 210, from what I've seen. And yes, plenty have put down <200. So, those engines...teh majority of stock L98's are actually closer to 200, than to 300.
"I got to 400 with only a few more things done."
I don't know what "more" means or is in reference to, but it comes across as SOUNDING LIKE, getting to 400 is no biggie. You spent 10k though. That's a lot. That doesn't really qualify as "badda bing badda boom"...400 hp! ...If that's what you were implying. Maybe you weren't implying that, but it seemed like it the way you typed it.
"300 at the crank NOW....240 RWHP...maybe little less."
...which just ain't true at all. You were corrected, by multiple people and I wasn't one of them. Although, I would like to point out to you that I have corrected you on this very same topic in the past (review it HERE), so I was surprised that you were still posting that factories are rating hp at the rear wheels when they are not.
People come on the forums looking for GOOD advice -not misinformation. I used to be one of those people...and sometimes, I still am. I don't want B.S., sensationalized emotionally driven opinions and lore posted as fact. I want fact, when I am seeking advice....or at least an opinion or perspective posted as such. Giving out misinformation is a disservice to the forum and anyone looking for GOOD advice. It's not fair. Frankly, that kind of misinformation has cost me a lot of money in the past and could for others in the future. I believe that several people posted in this thread contradicting your posts (myself included) not to "bash" as you seem to have taken it, but to correct the facts...for you AND for others who are unwitting and unfortunate enough to read this stuff. You really don't need to take offense or have a hurt ego over these corrections. After all, as you said, "learning is fun!", right?
Last edited by Tom400CFI; Mar 23, 2013 at 02:47 AM.





Ahhh, yeah....could you help me with this "bashing" thing? Not really sure where that happened. You came on here and said that an L98 is
"300 at the crank NOW....240 RWHP...maybe little less."
...which just ain't true at all. You were corrected, by multiple people and I wasn't one of them. Although, I would like to point out to you that I have corrected you on this very same topic in the past (review it HERE), so I was surprised that you were still posting that factories are rating hp at the rear wheels when they are not.
People come on the forums looking for GOOD advice -not misinformation. I used to be one of those people...and sometimes, I still am. I don't want B.S., sensationalized emotionally driven opinions and lore posted as fact. I want fact, when I am seeking advice....or at least an opinion or perspective posted as such. Giving out misinformation is a disservice to the forum and anyone looking for GOOD advice. It's not fair. Frankly, that kind of misinformation has cost me a lot of money in the past and could for others in the future. I believe that several people posted in this thread contradicting your posts (myself included) not to "bash" as you seem to have taken it, but to correct the facts...for you AND for others who are unwitting and unfortunate enough to read this stuff. You really don't need to take offense or have a hurt ego over these corrections. After all, as you said, "learning is fun!", right?
I was one of those trying to correct his information, and for the exact same reasons you listed.
Once information gets on the internet, it is there forever even if it is wrong.
A year (or years) from now someone might come across this information and without the "corrections" some would even believe the misinformation to be true.
You know "They can't put anything on the internet that isn't true" types.
So, no bashing was ever intended. Just trying to make sure the wrong information does not continue to taken as "fact".
People come on the forums looking for GOOD advice -not misinformation. I used to be one of those people...and sometimes, I still am. I don't want B.S., sensationalized emotionally driven opinions and lore posted as fact. I want fact, when I am seeking advice....or at least an opinion or perspective posted as such. Giving out misinformation is a disservice to the forum and anyone looking for GOOD advice. It's not fair. Frankly, that kind of misinformation has cost me a lot of money in the past and could for others in the future. I believe that several people posted in this thread contradicting your posts (myself included) not to "bash" as you seem to have taken it, but to correct the facts...for you AND for others who are unwitting and unfortunate enough to read this stuff. You really don't need to take offense or have a hurt ego over these corrections. After all, as you said, "learning is fun!", right?
I value everybodys opinion, but when we state opinions as matter of fact statements, we probably need to clarify where we are coming from and how the fact has come to be. Something you don't always see here a whole lot anymore. I'm not banging on this forum.... I think its great. Its just when it comes to performance subjects, I think a different way of thinking might be needed for us as a collective group to step it up..... we need to start asking ourselves how we can compete with modified LSx generation cars instead of laying down and porting plenums and junk like that. And then have conversations that allow us to truly go in that direction.
But, its all good.
comes down to common sense. Ok, I used to have some...
but, my point being is that 300 at the wheels is still easy. Even IF the stock engine only makes 240 at the crank...thats about 180-90 at the wheels. Another 100 is needed. As far as I am concerned that is pretty basic with the simple upgrades that have been listed.
I got to 400 with only a few more things done.
regarding the rwhp.....I've never seen a stock or near stock C4 dyno under 200 atn the wheels... so that leads me to believe that they must be closer to 300 at the crank than 200...knowing there is a good loss between the flywheel and the rubber.
Stock motor:
cam
slp runners
major porting of baseplate & plenum
52mm TB w-K&N
headers, good exhaust system
adjustable FPR & better pump
up 1 size in inj
TUNE
All for less than $4000...actually lots less if you do a lot of the labor, porting and R&R.
If thats not 300 hp I'll buy a ford.
That's what I need, about 300RWHP. That 4k is more than what I got the car for but that 300hp would bring a big smile to my face.
2 Once you surpass the mechanical grip of the tires, the extra power is useless. It applies on the drag strip, road course, and the street.
My plan is formulating.i'm THINKING of an engine module/w Speed Pro forged pistons.I'm thinking CR bump /w a set of .100 dome pistons(downside to this?).That module is $650.A FORGED crank can be had for $700.A semi conservative cam.Splayed 4 bolt caps.An intake (Holley?).and a set of long tube headers/exhaust.Everyone close to me wants to see this.I'm famous for it!
THis makes 138HP.But it weighs 400lbs.
Beautiful thing about those heads is they run w/o valve springs! Less parasitic drag!
Last edited by DucXL; Mar 24, 2013 at 07:41 AM. Reason: clarity














