When you click on links to various merchants on this site and make a purchase, this can result in this site earning a commission. Affiliate programs and affiliations include, but are not limited to, the eBay Partner Network.
I just got the Fastchip instead of Hypertech for my 90 vet. Hypertech is good for doing 2 main things. One, it tells the fans to turn on sooner. Two, it works only at WOT. Fastchip works all the time (from 400rpm up)...not just WOT. They claim their chips will give an additional 10-12 HP over stock chips. Call the guys down at Fastchip for info. http://www.fastchip.com
Like the others have said, both will be a waste really unless you've done some mods. I've got the Ed Wright chip, but [redneck]she ain't exactly stock.[spit][/spit][/redneck]
Vic it seems like you like to get the most out of youre car why havent you tested a chip or have you :confused:
93aquaConvert
I have tried both of these chips and they didn't help me at all. As a matter of fact , I went slower with them. Both were the off the shelf chips, not custom chips.
I am running the stock 89 Vette chip and it seems to be doing ok. :D
I track tested these aftermarket chips on the same day, here are the results:
I have the generic ed wright chip. When I put it in I could feel no difference driving it. But at the track my et. dropped from a best of 13.49 to a 13.26 "these runs were made with ASR on" Now I must say that the 13.49 was run late fall and was my best run last year. The 13.26 was run in march of this year. Both were cool days. I havnt tried to do any other testing, but I suspect that the main reason it ran better is it was running 20 or 30 degrees cooler. Sometime I am going to take the chip out and try to use a manual fan switch to keep it cool and see what the stock chip does. One other thing the chip does is move the converter lock up to 50mph. On testing these, I do have one question for those such as Vic. Do you think it makes any difference if you switch the chip at the track and then run it? The reason I ask is, the manufactures of the chips say the car has to go through a learning process to get the chip to work properly. I once read from TPIS "I think" that it can take as much as 500 miles to relearn after a chip change.
On testing these, I do have one question for those such as Vic. Do you think it makes any difference if you switch the chip at the track and then run it? The reason I ask is, the manufactures of the chips say the car has to go through a learning process to get the chip to work properly.
Good question. The chip learning process might be for part throttle and cruising paramaters.
Take a look at my results in the above post.
I changed the chips at the track and when I put my stock chip back in, I got my ET right back with NO re-learn process.