C4 Tech/Performance L98 Corvette and LT1 Corvette Technical Info, Internal Engine, External Engine

Need Some Help with Alignment Specs

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Jun 28, 2013 | 12:16 PM
  #1  
cumbercr's Avatar
cumbercr
Thread Starter
Melting Slicks
10 Year Member
 
Joined: Mar 2008
Posts: 2,141
Likes: 76
From: Santa Maria, CA
Default Need Some Help with Alignment Specs

I just finished rebuilding the front suspension and steering rack on my 85. I did the rebuild because the car wandered and pulled on uneven surfaces. Over the last 5 years my tires had worn perfectly. I installed new poly bushings, ball joints, tie rods and had the steering rack rebuilt by Turn One. I did not replace the upper control arm bushings. They looked to be OK and I didn't want to deal with pressing new bushings in.

I had a local shop do the alignment. The Tech checked caster and camber and left them as is. He adjusted the toe.

Actual LF Camber -0.1 Factory +0.3 to +1.3
Actual RF Camber -0.2

Actual LF Caster +4.9 Factory +2.3 to +3.8
Actual RF Caster +4.7

Actual LF Toe -0.01 Factory -0.10 to +0.10
Actual RF Toe +0.01

I'm curious what others are setting caster and camber to. Should I go with positive camber like the factory specs? And do I need to reduce caster? By the way, this is a street car that I may do some autocross with.
Reply
Old Jun 28, 2013 | 12:28 PM
  #2  
DanielRicany's Avatar
DanielRicany
Melting Slicks
 
Joined: Jun 2013
Posts: 3,065
Likes: 39
Default

Hi, the caster and camber numbers here look like they are designed for performance. These will give you better stability going straight and around corners. Excellent for racing. But, the camber may wear your tires a little faster than it would if it was factory. Your toe is good, and this should be a stiffer ride, and have more stable handling. If you would like to have them to factory go back and make him do it. But these are the specs that I would prefer.

Good luck!

Forgot to mention, what happened with the rear toe and camber results? Did he not do the rear? You always do the rear FIRST in an alignment. The rear alignment specs, if off, can cause a pull too.
Reply
Old Jun 28, 2013 | 02:46 PM
  #3  
cumbercr's Avatar
cumbercr
Thread Starter
Melting Slicks
10 Year Member
 
Joined: Mar 2008
Posts: 2,141
Likes: 76
From: Santa Maria, CA
Default

Thanks for the reply. The Tech also felt the caster and camber would be better for performance. So I had him leave them as is. He did check the rear. The numbers are below. I had him leave the rear alone because I plan on doing a complete rebuild of the rear very soon.

Actual LR Camber +0.20 Factory -0.10 to +0.90
Actual RR Camber -0.30

Actual LR Toe +0.09 Factory -0.10 to +0.10
Actual RR Toe -0.04
Reply
Old Jun 28, 2013 | 03:38 PM
  #4  
JackDidley's Avatar
JackDidley
Race Director
20 Year Member
Active Streak: 30 Days
Liked
Loved
 
Joined: Sep 2003
Posts: 16,838
Likes: 341
From: Database Error Indiana
Default

Those numbers look good. I like 6* caster, to make it go very straight at high speed.
Reply
Old Jun 28, 2013 | 04:28 PM
  #5  
383vett's Avatar
383vett
Race Director
20 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
 
Joined: Apr 2003
Posts: 17,700
Likes: 1,667
From: moraga ca
Default

Your target camber numbers are wack. There hasn't been a Corvette built that asks for positive camber settings front or rear.
Reply
Old Jun 28, 2013 | 05:12 PM
  #6  
cumbercr's Avatar
cumbercr
Thread Starter
Melting Slicks
10 Year Member
 
Joined: Mar 2008
Posts: 2,141
Likes: 76
From: Santa Maria, CA
Default

Originally Posted by 383vett
Your target camber numbers are wack. There hasn't been a Corvette built that asks for positive camber settings front or rear.
Those numbers came right out of my FSM. They also came up on the alignment shop's computer. The Tech said he didn't understand why they would specify positive camber. That's why I'm asking the question.
Reply
Old Jun 28, 2013 | 05:40 PM
  #7  
DanielRicany's Avatar
DanielRicany
Melting Slicks
 
Joined: Jun 2013
Posts: 3,065
Likes: 39
Default

Okay looks good for handling and corners. It will give your better performance than from the factory, although the ride will be much stiffer and you will definitely feel the bumps more. Tires may have camber wear a little, but that's the price you pay. Other than that, feel free to drive like a maniac, because this car will take it.
Reply
Old Jun 28, 2013 | 05:49 PM
  #8  
cumbercr's Avatar
cumbercr
Thread Starter
Melting Slicks
10 Year Member
 
Joined: Mar 2008
Posts: 2,141
Likes: 76
From: Santa Maria, CA
Default

Originally Posted by DanielRicany
Okay looks good for handling and corners. It will give your better performance than from the factory, although the ride will be much stiffer and you will definitely feel the bumps more. Tires may have camber wear a little, but that's the price you pay. Other than that, feel free to drive like a maniac, because this car will take it.
With the poly bushings it does feel a little stiffer. The car is a Z51, so it has stiffer springs, 30mm front sway bar and closer ratio steering. I'm looking forward to trying it on autocross. The car will do fine, it's the driver that worries me.
Reply
Corvette Stories

The Best of Corvette for Corvette Enthusiasts

story-0

10 Ugly Corvettes That We Still Kinda Love

 Joe Kucinski
story-1

Top 10 Most Expensive Corvettes Ever Sold on Bring A Trailer

 Brett Foote
story-2

10 Things Every Corvette Owner Needs (2026 Edition)

 Michael S. Palmer
story-3

8 Most "Only Corvette Owners Understand" Quirks and Problems

 Pouria Savadkouei
story-4

10 Reasons the C6 Z06 is Still A Performance Benchmark After 20 Years

 Joe Kucinski
story-5

How Much Horsepower Every Corvette Engine "LOST" in 1972

 Joe Kucinski
story-6

Top 10 DOs and DON'Ts for Protecting Your Convertible Top!

 Michael S. Palmer
story-7

Top 10 Most Explosive Corvettes Ever Made: Power-to-Weight Ratio Ranked!

 Joe Kucinski
story-8

150 hp to 1,250 hp: Every Corvette Generation Compared by the Specs That Matter

 Joe Kucinski
story-9

8 Coolest Corvette Pace Cars (and Replicas) of All Time

 Verdad Gallardo
Old Jun 28, 2013 | 05:56 PM
  #9  
383vett's Avatar
383vett
Race Director
20 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
 
Joined: Apr 2003
Posts: 17,700
Likes: 1,667
From: moraga ca
Default

Originally Posted by cumbercr
Those numbers came right out of my FSM. They also came up on the alignment shop's computer. The Tech said he didn't understand why they would specify positive camber. That's why I'm asking the question.
Something is not right. Check out these numbers...

http://tech.corvettecentral.com/2011...ignment-specs/
Reply
Old Jun 28, 2013 | 06:00 PM
  #10  
DanielRicany's Avatar
DanielRicany
Melting Slicks
 
Joined: Jun 2013
Posts: 3,065
Likes: 39
Default

It's the alignment that will make it feel stiffer. Your caster angles will add better stability, tighter steering, and a stiffer ride. This is because the shock is now more towards the passenger compartment, and with every bump, because of positive caster, is aimed towards the passenger compartment. Negative caster will add looser steering, better steering wheel return-ability, and softer ride because the shock is directed towards the engine bay.
Reply
Old Jun 28, 2013 | 06:07 PM
  #11  
cumbercr's Avatar
cumbercr
Thread Starter
Melting Slicks
10 Year Member
 
Joined: Mar 2008
Posts: 2,141
Likes: 76
From: Santa Maria, CA
Default

Originally Posted by 383vett
Something is not right. Check out these numbers...

http://tech.corvettecentral.com/2011...ignment-specs/
I like these targets better. I'm holding on to this. I don't know what to say about the factory specs. Just cause something's written down don't make it right.

I think for my use, advanced street may be the best specs.
Reply
Old Jun 28, 2013 | 06:09 PM
  #12  
383vett's Avatar
383vett
Race Director
20 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
 
Joined: Apr 2003
Posts: 17,700
Likes: 1,667
From: moraga ca
Default

Originally Posted by cumbercr
I like these targets better. I'm holding on to this. I don't know what to say about the factory specs. Just cause something's written down don't make it right.

I think for my use, advanced street may be the best specs.
If you go with positive camber, your car will look like a 70s VW bug and squeal around corners.
Reply
Old Jun 28, 2013 | 06:18 PM
  #13  
cumbercr's Avatar
cumbercr
Thread Starter
Melting Slicks
10 Year Member
 
Joined: Mar 2008
Posts: 2,141
Likes: 76
From: Santa Maria, CA
Default

Originally Posted by DanielRicany
It's the alignment that will make it feel stiffer. Your caster angles will add better stability, tighter steering, and a stiffer ride. This is because the shock is now more towards the passenger compartment, and with every bump, because of positive caster, is aimed towards the passenger compartment. Negative caster will add looser steering, better steering wheel return-ability, and softer ride because the shock is directed towards the engine bay.
Thanks for explaining caster. I was having trouble understanding what effect the geometry has on handling. It's not intuitive!
Reply
Old Jun 28, 2013 | 07:46 PM
  #14  
Midnight 85's Avatar
Midnight 85
Le Mans Master
15 Year Member
 
Joined: May 2004
Posts: 5,866
Likes: 60
From: Hellinois
Finalist 2020 C4 of the Year - Modified
Default

I'm guessing 383vette gave you the advanced street specs from VB&P's catalog. I had the shop use those specs on my car and I really like the difference it made. One thing to keep in mind and I know this is going to stir the pot but NEVER and I mean NEVER believe all you read in the fsm! I just got done straightening out a wiring issue because the '85 fsm was wrong in at least a dozen different areas. Gordon Killebrew told GM the book was wrong many times and GM ignored him.
Reply
Old Jun 28, 2013 | 07:55 PM
  #15  
vader86's Avatar
vader86
Team Owner
20 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
 
Joined: Sep 2001
Posts: 62,160
Likes: 1,733
From: Athens AL
C7 of the Year - Unmodified Finalist 2021
C4 of Year Finalist (performance mods) 2019
Default

I used the advanced street specs from VBP on the 86. It didn't make a huge difference but I did like the change. Without checking, the specs 383vette gave look the same.
Reply
Old Jun 28, 2013 | 08:24 PM
  #16  
cumbercr's Avatar
cumbercr
Thread Starter
Melting Slicks
10 Year Member
 
Joined: Mar 2008
Posts: 2,141
Likes: 76
From: Santa Maria, CA
Default

Thanks all for the replies. I feel enlightened on the subject. My next step is to completely rebuild the rear suspension with poly bushings, replace the half shaft u-joints and service the differential. I'm looking for a reputable shop to adjust the ring and pinion gear lash.

Once I've finished the rear, I'll have the front and rear aligned to the advanced street specs 383Vette provided. This has been educational.

Vader,
Did you put the engine Jim built into the 88?
Reply
Old Jun 28, 2013 | 09:07 PM
  #17  
PLRX's Avatar
PLRX
Team Owner
 
Joined: Aug 2005
Posts: 34,988
Likes: 515
From: Riverside County Southern California
Co-winner 2020 C4 of the Year - Modified
2018 Corvette of Year Finalist
2017 C4 of Year
2016 C7 of Year Finalist
St. Jude Donor '09 thru '20
Default

Originally Posted by 383vett
Your target camber numbers are wack. There hasn't been a Corvette built that asks for positive camber settings front or rear.




Give this to your alignment shop.

Reply

Get notified of new replies

To Need Some Help with Alignment Specs

Old Jun 28, 2013 | 10:49 PM
  #18  
84wannabezo6's Avatar
84wannabezo6
Instructor
 
Joined: Oct 2010
Posts: 215
Likes: 1
Default

Dick Guldstrand also has a spec sheet you might want to check out
Reply
Old Jun 28, 2013 | 11:10 PM
  #19  
pkincy's Avatar
pkincy
Safety Car
20 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
 
Joined: Jun 2003
Posts: 4,250
Likes: 656
From: San Diego Ca
Default

Can we get 3 deg negative with our stock suspension geometry? I forget as my only real autox Corvette was a 94 Coupe that I ran for about a year. I do remember more negative than I could get on a stock height F Body, but I don't remember 3 degree's negative. That would be wonderful at an autox and would quickly kill your tires on the street.

I don't remember ever running more than 2 deg negative on my race car and that could have gotten more and that had zero street miles.

BTW, I like the specs you have now. A good mix of performance and OK for street use.
Reply
Old Jul 1, 2013 | 02:01 AM
  #20  
Hot Rod Roy's Avatar
Hot Rod Roy
Safety Car
15 Year Member
 
Joined: Sep 2004
Posts: 3,953
Likes: 550
From: Mission Viejo CA
Default

Originally Posted by DanielRicany
. . . the shock is now more towards the passenger compartment, and with every bump, because of positive caster, is aimed towards the passenger compartment. Negative caster will add . . . better steering wheel return-ability . . .
Sorry, Daniel, but I can't agree with this analysis. Changing the caster in a Corvette won't affect the angle of the shock. Negative caster will cause the car to wander, and the steering wheel won't return to center on its own. The +5 degrees caster recommended by several people is an excellent suggestion.

If you want to test this negative caster idea, try backing up fast, turn the steering wheel a bit, then take your hands off the wheel! (Be ready to step on the brakes!!)

Reply



All times are GMT -4. The time now is 12:46 PM.

story-0
10 Ugly Corvettes That We Still Kinda Love

Slideshow: 10 ugly Corvettes that we still kinda love.

By Joe Kucinski | 2026-06-03 10:34:17


VIEW MORE
story-1
Top 10 Most Expensive Corvettes Ever Sold on Bring A Trailer

A lot of money has changed hands at the online auction house over the years.

By Brett Foote | 2026-06-03 10:21:50


VIEW MORE
story-2
10 Things Every Corvette Owner Needs (2026 Edition)

Slideshow: 10 great gifts Corvette enthusiasts actually want for Father's Day!

By Michael S. Palmer | 2026-06-03 15:43:40


VIEW MORE
story-3
8 Most "Only Corvette Owners Understand" Quirks and Problems

Slideshow: These are the quirks, annoyances, and oddly lovable problems that every Corvette owner eventually learns to live with.

By Pouria Savadkouei | 2026-05-28 09:31:39


VIEW MORE
story-4
10 Reasons the C6 Z06 is Still A Performance Benchmark After 20 Years

Slideshow: 10 reasons why the C6 Z06 is still a performance benchmark after 20 years.

By Joe Kucinski | 2026-05-27 17:20:09


VIEW MORE
story-5
How Much Horsepower Every Corvette Engine "LOST" in 1972

Slideshow: How much horsepower every Corvette engine lost in 1972.

By Joe Kucinski | 2026-05-27 16:54:53


VIEW MORE
story-6
Top 10 DOs and DON'Ts for Protecting Your Convertible Top!

Slideshow: How to Protect A Convertible Top: 10 DOs & DON'Ts

By Michael S. Palmer | 2026-04-03 00:00:00


VIEW MORE
story-7
Top 10 Most Explosive Corvettes Ever Made: Power-to-Weight Ratio Ranked!

Slideshow: The 10 most explosive Corvettes ever built based on power-to-weight ratio.

By Joe Kucinski | 2026-05-20 07:23:03


VIEW MORE
story-8
150 hp to 1,250 hp: Every Corvette Generation Compared by the Specs That Matter

Slideshow: From C1 to C8 we compare every Corvette generation by the numbers.

By Joe Kucinski | 2026-05-12 16:54:12


VIEW MORE
story-9
8 Coolest Corvette Pace Cars (and Replicas) of All Time

Slideshow: Some Corvette pace cars became collectible legends, while others perfectly captured the look and attitude of their era.

By Verdad Gallardo | 2026-05-11 09:50:51


VIEW MORE