C4 Tech/Performance L98 Corvette and LT1 Corvette Technical Info, Internal Engine, External Engine

Got Cam Recommendation, does it look right?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Jun 30, 2014 | 02:34 PM
  #1  
rithsleeper's Avatar
rithsleeper
Thread Starter
Drifting
15 Year Member
Conversation Starter
All Eyes On Me
 
Joined: Dec 2007
Posts: 1,672
Likes: 8
From: Sumter South Carolina
Default Got Cam Recommendation, does it look right?

I called comp cams and got their recommendation of cam for my engine. Wanted to make sure it all looks right. Also talking with a dealer for AFR heads and about to finalize purchase but still on edge about the head size.

383 Stroker in my 1989 manual vette
Need a lot of high end rpm because used for almost entirely Road Racing NASA/SCCA. Want to be able to hold a gear close or to 7000 RPM. Also in Autocross I always need more 2nd gear (3rd hardly ever worth shifting for).

Intake will be a USM ported Holley Stealth Ram
AFR Head either 210cc or 220 (would like to hear recommendations. my thoughts are go bigger in case of future modification)

Will be using a 5.7 Rod (thinking of a 6. I want reliability over power)

The Cam Recommended is: http://www.compcams.com/Company/CC/c...?csid=161&sb=2

Thing that makes me a bit weary is it looks too small. I am going to use a 1.6 Roller rocker so the specs change to 251/258 550intake 568 exhaust, but still seems a bit small... He said it makes power from 2000 to 6300. Could I hold a gear up to 7000? That seems a long way a way from 6300.
Reply
Old Jun 30, 2014 | 11:53 PM
  #2  
blackozvet's Avatar
blackozvet
Safety Car
Conversation Starter
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
 
Joined: Nov 2009
Posts: 3,973
Likes: 341
From: Adelaide South Australia
Default

you will need something in the .600's plus to make power to 7000
He has probably based the cam recommendation on using a Stealth Ram.
Reply
Old Jul 1, 2014 | 07:10 AM
  #3  
rithsleeper's Avatar
rithsleeper
Thread Starter
Drifting
15 Year Member
Conversation Starter
All Eyes On Me
 
Joined: Dec 2007
Posts: 1,672
Likes: 8
From: Sumter South Carolina
Default

I told him it has been ported to flow 290cc per runner. It just seemed like when I was asking him specific questions all he was doing was plugging it into their program and seeing what happened...

What other company can I call for a second opinion?
Reply
Old Jul 1, 2014 | 09:27 AM
  #4  
black_89_vette's Avatar
black_89_vette
Melting Slicks
25 Year Member
Conversation Starter
All Eyes On Me
 
Joined: Nov 2000
Posts: 2,469
Likes: 6
From: Winchester Ontario
Default

Originally Posted by rithsleeper
I told him it has been ported to flow 290cc per runner. It just seemed like when I was asking him specific questions all he was doing was plugging it into their program and seeing what happened...

What other company can I call for a second opinion?
236/242 duration will only really change to 238/244 when you go to 1.6 rr's I think. The rr's effectively change the lift, not so much the duration.

Have you looked at Lunati Voodoo 60123? More lift and some more duration.
http://www.summitracing.com/int/part...0123/overview/
Reply
Old Jul 1, 2014 | 10:23 AM
  #5  
cv67's Avatar
cv67
Team Owner
15 Year Member
 
Joined: Oct 2004
Posts: 81,241
Likes: 3,063
From: altered state
St. Jude Donor '05
Default

210 comp port should do the job ifits 7k max get the best head for the build now and it will run right
If I were running a motor up to 7 and holding it there or close I wouldnt even bother with a hydraulic put a solid in there and really make some power. no risk of lifters pumping up and hurting things. with a qualtiy rocker setup youll only have to ck lash 1 or 2 x a yr if that. where do you want your power to start and stop, gear ratio?

Last edited by cv67; Jul 1, 2014 at 10:42 AM.
Reply
Old Jul 1, 2014 | 11:12 AM
  #6  
blackozvet's Avatar
blackozvet
Safety Car
Conversation Starter
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
 
Joined: Nov 2009
Posts: 3,973
Likes: 341
From: Adelaide South Australia
Default

Originally Posted by rithsleeper
I told him it has been ported to flow 290cc per runner. It just seemed like when I was asking him specific questions all he was doing was plugging it into their program and seeing what happened...
What other company can I call for a second opinion?
sounds to me like he punched in stealth ram and thats what the computer told him,
what computer setup are you going to run it ? dont forget that if you go crazy with the cam its going to be difficult to tune an efi,
I would find the people on here who have stealth ram setups or have built them and ask them what sort of cam to use, you will probably get better info on CF.
Reply
Old Jul 1, 2014 | 11:42 AM
  #7  
GREGGPENN's Avatar
GREGGPENN
Race Director
20 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
 
Joined: Nov 2003
Posts: 12,221
Likes: 446
From: Overland Park Kansas
2020 Corvette of the Year Finalist (appearance mods)
C4 of Year Winner (appearance mods) 2019
Default

Originally Posted by blackozvet
I would find the people on here who have stealth ram setups or have built them and ask them what sort of cam to use, you will probably get better info on CF.
BJankuski (Brian) has experience with the Stealth Ram and high HP cars. He has several. Consider asking him about the USR SRam too.

Cuisinart also knows his stuff. For 7k rpm, solid roller sounds the way to go. Shaft rockers I'm guessing too.

6" rods make more top-end power so that's what you want. They aren't any less reliable.

Consider oiling and windage tray with your build.

Bullet cams will work with you to determine a custom cam.
Reply
Old Jul 1, 2014 | 12:06 PM
  #8  
383vett's Avatar
383vett
Race Director
20 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
 
Joined: Apr 2003
Posts: 17,699
Likes: 1,667
From: moraga ca
Default

Originally Posted by cuisinartvette
210 comp port should do the job ifits 7k max get the best head for the build now and it will run right
If I were running a motor up to 7 and holding it there or close I wouldnt even bother with a hydraulic put a solid in there and really make some power. no risk of lifters pumping up and hurting things. with a qualtiy rocker setup youll only have to ck lash 1 or 2 x a yr if that. where do you want your power to start and stop, gear ratio?
For 7000rpm, you are talking about a race motor and you don't need the extra weight of hydraulic rollers. One thing that hasn't been asked is what your compression ratio is. That has a lot to do with cam selection. A 383 is inherently a torquer motor based on it's bore/stroke ratio. If you are looking for high rpm horsepower, a 377 would fit your needs better.
Reply
Corvette Stories

The Best of Corvette for Corvette Enthusiasts

story-0

Top 10 DOs and DON'Ts for Protecting Your Convertible Top!

 Michael S. Palmer
story-1

Top 10 Most Explosive Corvettes Ever Made: Power-to-Weight Ratio Ranked!

 Joe Kucinski
story-2

150 hp to 1,250 hp: Every Corvette Generation Compared by the Specs That Matter

 Joe Kucinski
story-3

8 Coolest Corvette Pace Cars (and Replicas) of All Time

 Verdad Gallardo
story-4

Top 10 Corvette Engines RANKED by Peak Torque (70+ Years of Muscle!)

 Joe Kucinski
story-5

Corvette ZR1X Will Be Pacing the Indy 500, And Could Probably Race, Too!

 Verdad Gallardo
story-6

Top 10 Corvettes Coming to Mecum Indy 2026!

 Brett Foote
story-7

Top 10 C9 Corvette MUST-HAVES to Fix These C8 Generation Flaws!

 Michael S. Palmer
story-8

10 Revolutionary 'Corvette Firsts' Most People Don't Know

 Joe Kucinski
story-9

5 Reasons to Upgrade to an LS6-Powered Corvette; 5 Reasons to Stay LT2

 Michael S. Palmer
Old Jul 1, 2014 | 01:09 PM
  #9  
rithsleeper's Avatar
rithsleeper
Thread Starter
Drifting
15 Year Member
Conversation Starter
All Eyes On Me
 
Joined: Dec 2007
Posts: 1,672
Likes: 8
From: Sumter South Carolina
Default

All things I told to the guy when he made the recommendation... hmm.
Problem is I already have a set of 1.6 roller rockers crane golds. I need to use them to be able to spend all I can on the bottom end. The competition afr 210 or 220 will be good flow and feed it. Only thing I was thinking is upgrading the springs to handle over .600 lift.

Compression: shooting for 10.5:1 still run 93 octane
ecu: holley commander
bosch III injectors 40lb
Ill go with 6" rods (just always heard its tough on cylinder walls)
Rear gear is 3.73 6-speed zf6 black tag, spec flywheel/clutch 2+
usm holley stealth ram ported and cut to fit under hood
Already have remote oil cooler and canton rr pan.
cam is what is in the air

I already have a summit block 1 piece rms fit for hydraulic cam. Everyone ive talked to so far says I dont need flat tappet and should be fine for hydraulic. I need to hold up to 7k but just get there. Not pull. If I make peak power at 6500 I think with a good cam and stable valve train and balanced block shouldnt be a problem. I dont need it all the time, just in certain instances.
Reply
Old Jul 1, 2014 | 01:39 PM
  #10  
DanZ51's Avatar
DanZ51
Burning Brakes
20 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
 
Joined: Jun 2005
Posts: 1,188
Likes: 13
From: Wallingford Vermont
Default

Ill go with 6" rods (just always heard its tough on cylinder walls)
I'm no expert but,

I think you got it backwards, short rods should induce more side loading - scuffing of cylinder walls. That's why the 400 cu in small blocks wore out so fast (relatively) was the 5.565" rod with a 3.75 stroke.

Does anyone find it curious (besides me) that AFR recommends a dual pattern cam? I mean: AFR has some of the best I/E flow rates in the industry (upper 70% - 80% I/E ratio), his exhaust will be full competition (so no restriction there), why go big on exhaust duration? (and give up that mid-range pull)

Last edited by DanZ51; Jul 1, 2014 at 02:28 PM.
Reply
Old Jul 1, 2014 | 01:49 PM
  #11  
rithsleeper's Avatar
rithsleeper
Thread Starter
Drifting
15 Year Member
Conversation Starter
All Eyes On Me
 
Joined: Dec 2007
Posts: 1,672
Likes: 8
From: Sumter South Carolina
Default

Exhaust is straight pipe.
Reply
Old Jul 1, 2014 | 02:06 PM
  #12  
Tom400CFI's Avatar
Tom400CFI
Team Owner
Pro Mechanic
20 Year Member
 
Joined: Aug 2004
Posts: 21,543
Likes: 3,216
From: Park City Utah
Default

Originally Posted by DanZ51
I'm no expert but,

I think you got it backwards, short rods should induce more side loading - scuffing of cylinder walls. That's why the 400 cu in small blocks wore out so fast (relatively) was the 5.565" rod with a 3.75 stroke.
That is correct
Reply
Old Jul 1, 2014 | 03:11 PM
  #13  
383vett's Avatar
383vett
Race Director
20 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
 
Joined: Apr 2003
Posts: 17,699
Likes: 1,667
From: moraga ca
Default

Originally Posted by DanZ51
I'm no expert but,



Does anyone find it curious (besides me) that AFR recommends a dual pattern cam? I mean: AFR has some of the best I/E flow rates in the industry (upper 70% - 80% I/E ratio), his exhaust will be full competition (so no restriction there), why go big on exhaust duration? (and give up that mid-range pull)
Good point here. Most dual pattern cams favor the intake with increased duration. Exhaust gasses pretty much explode out the port and don't need as much time to exhaust as the intake needs to suck in the charge. Also, that cam is recommended for a 9.0 compression ratio. 10.5 is quite a difference.
Reply
Old Jul 1, 2014 | 03:32 PM
  #14  
ANTI VENOM's Avatar
ANTI VENOM
Melting Slicks
25 Year Member
Conversation Starter
All Eyes On Me
Liked
 
Joined: Oct 2000
Posts: 2,158
Likes: 9
From: N.E. WA
Default

Originally Posted by 383vett
Good point here. Most dual pattern cams favor the intake with increased duration. Exhaust gasses pretty much explode out the port and don't need as much time to exhaust as the intake needs to suck in the charge. Also, that cam is recommended for a 9.0 compression ratio. 10.5 is quite a difference.
Dual pattern SBC cams usually have a longer duration on the exhaust side. ie... 224,230 230,236 236,242
Reply
Old Jul 1, 2014 | 04:48 PM
  #15  
383vett's Avatar
383vett
Race Director
20 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
 
Joined: Apr 2003
Posts: 17,699
Likes: 1,667
From: moraga ca
Default

Originally Posted by ANTI VENOM
Dual pattern SBC cams usually have a longer duration on the exhaust side. ie... 224,230 230,236 236,242
You're right. Brain fart. Try this; exhaust valves are smaller so the duration needs to be longer to get the gasses out.

Last edited by 383vett; Jul 1, 2014 at 05:15 PM.
Reply
Old Jul 1, 2014 | 05:07 PM
  #16  
rithsleeper's Avatar
rithsleeper
Thread Starter
Drifting
15 Year Member
Conversation Starter
All Eyes On Me
 
Joined: Dec 2007
Posts: 1,672
Likes: 8
From: Sumter South Carolina
Default

I pmed bjankuski but no response yet. What should be my next move? Should I call comp cams again and try to get someone else? Or try a different company? Or make a new post called "need cam recommendation"? Last thing I want to do is leave power and rpms on the table.

Usually people end up regretting an aggressive cam because they loose drivability and low end torque. Both of which I have no use for. I need this thing to pull hard to 6500 and then not be under 250hp by 7000.

Ive seen some third gen guys slap stealth rams on and get some very unimpressive numbers with inadequate cam and 190cc heads. Making me worried. I would be satisfied with 400 to the wheels but nothing less.
Reply
Old Jul 1, 2014 | 06:09 PM
  #17  
GREGGPENN's Avatar
GREGGPENN
Race Director
20 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
 
Joined: Nov 2003
Posts: 12,221
Likes: 446
From: Overland Park Kansas
2020 Corvette of the Year Finalist (appearance mods)
C4 of Year Winner (appearance mods) 2019
Default

Originally Posted by DanZ51
I think you got it backwards, short rods should induce more side loading - scuffing of cylinder walls. That's why the 400 cu in small blocks wore out so fast (relatively) was the 5.565" rod with a 3.75 stroke.
Correct...but either choice of rod length had newer options to mitigate cylinder wall wear. I stuck with 5.7" rods and 383 for torque. But, I went with thinner rings to mitigate cylinder wall wear. IIRC, you can find ring-packs as thin as 1mm,1mm,3mm sets. This is one of the BIG reasons newer blocks regularly go north of 200k miles since the mid-to-late 90's.

Originally Posted by DanZ51
Does anyone find it curious (besides me) that AFR recommends a dual pattern cam? I mean: AFR has some of the best I/E flow rates in the industry (upper 70% - 80% I/E ratio), his exhaust will be full competition (so no restriction there), why go big on exhaust duration? (and give up that mid-range pull)
Do you mean Comp? I don't see a recommendation from AFR on cam selection. Tests I've read over the years point to anything from a single-pattern cam to 4-degree split for AFR stuff. Not going to be a huge difference either way. Size/config of exhaust matters a bit. Even intake runner length could affect the selection.

One reason I suggested talking to Brian about the USR HSR is power limitations. I think he had some frustrations and had to rework it quite a bit. I also wonder if he thinks a MR would be better for your power range? I was thinking the HSR was better for a 6200-6500 RPM setup.
Reply

Get notified of new replies

To Got Cam Recommendation, does it look right?

Old Jul 1, 2014 | 08:51 PM
  #18  
cv67's Avatar
cv67
Team Owner
15 Year Member
 
Joined: Oct 2004
Posts: 81,241
Likes: 3,063
From: altered state
St. Jude Donor '05
Default

some good points here. You can run a single pattern cam with the afrs but running a split pattern can carry the power a little farther up. At that point its all about valve opening and closing events. You can have your cake and eat it too without blowing all your torque out the exhaust.
Try getting ahold of someone like Mamo, Chris Straub or the likes for the the "right" cam. Comp tech guys can only spend so much time
Im thinking there are some good off the shelf cams that will work fine just geting the right one. only about a bazillion cams have been ground for the sbc.
Sounds lke youre stuck on a HR...if you did go solid know most co's are making bushed rollersnow so no needle bearings to go bad couple that with a ramp that isnt too "extreme" you should have long life with either type of cam
Reply
Old Jul 1, 2014 | 11:45 PM
  #19  
rithsleeper's Avatar
rithsleeper
Thread Starter
Drifting
15 Year Member
Conversation Starter
All Eyes On Me
 
Joined: Dec 2007
Posts: 1,672
Likes: 8
From: Sumter South Carolina
Default

Its not that im stuck on the hsr, its more that is what I have. It would tack another $1000 on the price tag for a miniram. Im already over budget because I sprang for the afr heads. I know I could sell the hsr for some but thats not cash in hand. I would rather spec a cam with some growing room in it and swap later than sacrifice my rpm.

I hope I can speak to brian soon. Im about to have to order parts and get this thing started or it wont be done by aug when I have to go back to work.
Reply
Old Jul 2, 2014 | 01:17 AM
  #20  
ANTI VENOM's Avatar
ANTI VENOM
Melting Slicks
25 Year Member
Conversation Starter
All Eyes On Me
Liked
 
Joined: Oct 2000
Posts: 2,158
Likes: 9
From: N.E. WA
Default

Originally Posted by 383vett
You're right. Brain fart. Try this; exhaust valves are smaller so the duration needs to be longer to get the gasses out.
Just keepin ya honest. No worries, we've all been there.
Reply



All times are GMT -4. The time now is 12:14 AM.

story-0
Top 10 DOs and DON'Ts for Protecting Your Convertible Top!

Slideshow: How to Protect A Convertible Top: 10 DOs & DON'Ts

By Michael S. Palmer | 2026-04-03 00:00:00


VIEW MORE
story-1
Top 10 Most Explosive Corvettes Ever Made: Power-to-Weight Ratio Ranked!

Slideshow: The 10 most explosive Corvettes ever built based on power-to-weight ratio.

By Joe Kucinski | 2026-05-20 07:23:03


VIEW MORE
story-2
150 hp to 1,250 hp: Every Corvette Generation Compared by the Specs That Matter

Slideshow: From C1 to C8 we compare every Corvette generation by the numbers.

By Joe Kucinski | 2026-05-12 16:54:12


VIEW MORE
story-3
8 Coolest Corvette Pace Cars (and Replicas) of All Time

Slideshow: Some Corvette pace cars became collectible legends, while others perfectly captured the look and attitude of their era.

By Verdad Gallardo | 2026-05-11 09:50:51


VIEW MORE
story-4
Top 10 Corvette Engines RANKED by Peak Torque (70+ Years of Muscle!)

Slideshow: Ranking the top 10 Corvette engines by torque output.

By Joe Kucinski | 2026-05-05 11:58:09


VIEW MORE
story-5
Corvette ZR1X Will Be Pacing the Indy 500, And Could Probably Race, Too!

Slideshow: A Corvette pace car nearly matching IndyCar speeds sounds exaggerated, until you look at the numbers.

By Verdad Gallardo | 2026-05-04 20:03:36


VIEW MORE
story-6
Top 10 Corvettes Coming to Mecum Indy 2026!

Among a rather large group of them.

By Brett Foote | 2026-05-04 13:56:44


VIEW MORE
story-7
Top 10 C9 Corvette MUST-HAVES to Fix These C8 Generation Flaws!

Slideshow: the top 10 things Corvette owners want in the C9 Corvette

By Michael S. Palmer | 2026-04-30 12:41:15


VIEW MORE
story-8
10 Revolutionary 'Corvette Firsts' Most People Don't Know

Slideshow: 10 Important Corvette 'firsts' that every fan should know.

By Joe Kucinski | 2026-04-29 17:02:16


VIEW MORE
story-9
5 Reasons to Upgrade to an LS6-Powered Corvette; 5 Reasons to Stay LT2

Slideshow: Should you buy a 2020-2026 Corvette or wait for 2027?

By Michael S. Palmer | 2026-04-22 10:08:58


VIEW MORE