C4 Tech/Performance L98 Corvette and LT1 Corvette Technical Info, Internal Engine, External Engine

valvetrain question

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Dec 9, 2015 | 05:31 PM
  #1  
94VenomVette's Avatar
94VenomVette
Thread Starter
Racer
 
Joined: Sep 2015
Posts: 382
Likes: 17
Default valvetrain question

Guys fairly new here with a few questions. I want to upgrade to 1.6 rockers. I was looking at the Comp Cams Ultra gold but will they work for my 94? Also Do I Need guide plates and what valve springs should I use? Ive heard LT4 springs but not sure.

Basically looking to do a HotCam, 1.6 Aluminum Rockers, and springs. But for now would like to just install the rockers and springs.

Last edited by 94VenomVette; Dec 9, 2015 at 05:55 PM.
Reply
Old Dec 9, 2015 | 06:44 PM
  #2  
mtwoolford's Avatar
mtwoolford
Melting Slicks
10 Year Member
 
Joined: Jan 2009
Posts: 3,482
Likes: 195
From: folsom california
Default

well, if it's an Hot cam upgrade you want, get a complete Hot Cam kit, they're well thought out, proven and no surprises; plus you'll save a ton of money compared to piecing together every thing you'll need.

about those Ultra Gold rockers, first there is no listing for using them on an LT engine...which isn't a deal breaker, but if things go sour, it'll be on you. and they are very expensive. yes you'll need guide plates, and if you intend to use the polylock nuts, you'll probably need new set of tall valve covers too. Investigate what a set of those costs, and even more, try to find a pair that clear the LT accessory drive ...now you're talking some real money.

Final deal is it's all your choice and your money.
Reply
Old Dec 9, 2015 | 08:28 PM
  #3  
94VenomVette's Avatar
94VenomVette
Thread Starter
Racer
 
Joined: Sep 2015
Posts: 382
Likes: 17
Default

thanks for the reply, are there any aluminum rockers that fit then? What about narrow ones? i read about center bolt valve covers which the LT has obv can cause issues with non narrow rockers. Lets Say I go with the Ultra Gold if they'll work what guide plates would I need, or is it a matter of pick and choose and trial and error what works rotating the engine over by hand pretty much
Reply
Old Dec 9, 2015 | 10:11 PM
  #4  
mtwoolford's Avatar
mtwoolford
Melting Slicks
10 Year Member
 
Joined: Jan 2009
Posts: 3,482
Likes: 195
From: folsom california
Default

Originally Posted by 94VenomVette
thanks for the reply, are there any aluminum rockers that fit then? What about narrow ones? i read about center bolt valve covers which the LT has obv can cause issues with non narrow rockers. Lets Say I go with the Ultra Gold if they'll work what guide plates would I need, or is it a matter of pick and choose and trial and error what works rotating the engine over by hand pretty much
well let'see. if you go on the JEGS website and lookup "LT4 Hot Cam Kit", they list the GM part numbers for every single part included in that kit.

A little history, the LT4 Hot cam was developed for LT1 and LT4 engines prepared for showroom stock series; I installed one in my LT4 and it was a drop in and I'm very happy with it. My LT4 already had 1.6 rockers do all I had to buy (although I bought a lot more) was the cam and springs. LT1 engines require more, hence the "kit". And everything fit under my stock valve covers.

With that said, the "kit" uses self aligning rocker arms..which I'm not a fan of...I've seen other Hot Cam kits for other SBC chevys that include guide plates and conventional, non self aligning rockers. As to those Ultra Gold rockers, price wise they're essentially the same price as the rockers in the Hot Cam kit (if purchased separately). So, if you're going to piece together your valve train over time the Ultra Golds are definitely an option. Of course guide plates will have to be purchased.

One of the few items of good news, price wise, is that the LT4 Hot Cam springs is one of the few bargains out there; I think they can still be found for about $45.00 a set. Other than that, let the list of the parts listed in the JEGs' LT4 Hot Cam Kit be your shopping guide; And don't forget a set of valve stem seals while everything is apart.

Good luck.
Reply
Old Dec 9, 2015 | 10:23 PM
  #5  
mtwoolford's Avatar
mtwoolford
Melting Slicks
10 Year Member
 
Joined: Jan 2009
Posts: 3,482
Likes: 195
From: folsom california
Default

Originally Posted by 94VenomVette
Lets Say I go with the Ultra Gold if they'll work what guide plates would I need, or is it a matter of pick and choose and trial and error what works rotating the engine over by hand pretty much
well self guiding rocker arms do eliminate the hassle and cost of fitting guide plates so that's an advantage of the rockers in the factory kit.

there are adjustable guide plates available; but fitting any guide plate is gonna require extra labor and attention; of course some may fit right out of the box. who knows?

in any case you may also have to purchase aftermarket hardened pushrods to go with the guideplates...I don't know it the stockers are hardened, I suspect not.

And yes, no matter which way you go, you will be spinning the engine "over by hand pretty much".
Reply
Old Dec 10, 2015 | 08:13 PM
  #6  
Purple92's Avatar
Purple92
Melting Slicks
20 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Top Answer: 3
 
Joined: Jul 2005
Posts: 2,649
Likes: 863
Default

As mtwoolford pointed out - all the LT1 / LT4 motors use self aligning rocker arms. The Factory LT4 engines came with the 1.6:1 aluminum rocker arms - but those rocker arms did NOT use the adjustable poly locks - they used a different rocker arm stud that was designed to have the rocker arm nut bottom out when it was installed (supposedly for production reasons). I believe the rocker arms sold by GM were produced by Crane Cams, they are one very good source for 1.6:1 Rocker Arms. Comp Cams is another source and there are others out there. If you want to go with non-self aligning rocker arms - you need to use guide plates, and you need to use hardened pushrods, and you'll need to play around with the guide plates to get the roller tip to align with the valve tips. There are a lot of thoughts on which design (self aligning or non self-aligning) rocker arm is "better" - and while I'm in the guide plate camp - you can't argue with the fact that there are tens of millions of small block Chevies running with Self Aligning Rocker Arms that have survived for 100,000 miles without a hitch.

I prefer the polylock solution to the special studs that GM used on the LT4's, as you can put very little preload on the lifters to avoid "pumping up" if you are worried about valve float.

As for the LT4 springs and retainers - I know two people who have broken one of those LT4 springs. Both of these people tracked their cars - so there was definitely some significant time spent at higher RPM, but if I were to do springs on an LT engine I would probably NOT choose the LT4 springs - I'd go with a spring from a company that starts off with better material and does not worry about the price point as much as GM does. Comp Cams, Crane, Manley, etc. all make valve springs - spend a little time looking through their catalogs and you'll find that there are a lot of options, and don't be afraid to call up the tech people at the cam company and ask them for advice - they have people that know more about cam grinds and retainers / springs etc. than you'll find anywhere else... Any spring that is compatible with the LT4 "Hot Cam" or something roughly equivalent from the aftermarket should work just fine with the stock cam.

The cam in the Hot Cam kit is a reasonable piece - but if you change the cam or even the heads - count on needing to modify the PCM - the stock programming isn't going to cut it with either a cam swap or heads. I did the 1.6:1 Rockers and springs years ago - and I was able to get by with the stock programming until I made some "bigger" changes.

One last thought - the rocker arm and spring swap is pretty straight forward - use compressed air to hold the valves in place, each cylinder will take 15 - 20 minutes. (Since the plugs will be out during the job - you might as well have new plugs available to put in - there are a few cylinders that the plugs are easy to get out - and there are a few cylinders that are a bit more of a "challenge".) The cam removal is quite a bit more complicated - there are some really well written threads on here that describe the job in detail, do a search and you'll find them but the cam swap is not something that you can do in a day.
Reply
Old Dec 10, 2015 | 11:09 PM
  #7  
mtwoolford's Avatar
mtwoolford
Melting Slicks
10 Year Member
 
Joined: Jan 2009
Posts: 3,482
Likes: 195
From: folsom california
Default

Originally Posted by Purple92
As mtwoolford pointed out - all the LT1 / LT4 motors use self aligning rocker arms. The Factory LT4 engines came with the 1.6:1 aluminum rocker arms - but those rocker arms did NOT use the adjustable poly locks - they used a different rocker arm stud that was designed to have the rocker arm nut bottom out when it was installed (supposedly for production reasons). I believe the rocker arms sold by GM were produced by Crane Cams, they are one very good source for 1.6:1 Rocker Arms. Comp Cams is another source and there are others out there. If you want to go with non-self aligning rocker arms - you need to use guide plates, and you need to use hardened pushrods, and you'll need to play around with the guide plates to get the roller tip to align with the valve tips. There are a lot of thoughts on which design (self aligning or non self-aligning) rocker arm is "better" - and while I'm in the guide plate camp - you can't argue with the fact that there are tens of millions of small block Chevies running with Self Aligning Rocker Arms that have survived for 100,000 miles without a hitch.

I prefer the polylock solution to the special studs that GM used on the LT4's, as you can put very little preload on the lifters to avoid "pumping up" if you are worried about valve float.

The cam in the Hot Cam kit is a reasonable piece - but if you change the cam or even the heads - count on needing to modify the PCM - the stock programming isn't going to cut it with either a cam swap or heads. I did the 1.6:1 Rockers and springs years ago - and I was able to get by with the stock programming until I made some "bigger" changes.
yeah; what he said :I agree: Stock LT4 rockers mount on pedestals using a special, one of a kind 10mm stud and are not adjustable in the usual sense; just bolt 'em down and, for better or worse, that's it. True they were made by crane cams, but I didn't find any in the aftermarket; I had to go to the Chevy Parts counter and pay to replace two damaged rockers at $75.00 each. The LT4 hot cam kit has a much more desirable, and conventional stud mounting and are adjustable. Eventually I plan to swap out the oem LT4 rockers. Maybe for some Ultra Gold? Good luck, let us know how it all works out for you.

Last edited by mtwoolford; Dec 10, 2015 at 11:12 PM.
Reply
Old Dec 11, 2015 | 08:22 AM
  #8  
Purple92's Avatar
Purple92
Melting Slicks
20 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Top Answer: 3
 
Joined: Jul 2005
Posts: 2,649
Likes: 863
Default

mtwoolford ... If you do eventually change out the rockers - one of the reasons that I like the non-self aligning type is that on the self aligning rockers - the "ears" of the rocker arm are slightly below the roller tip - so those "ears" are what keeps the rocker in alignment with the top of the valve stem. I've seen significant wear on the "ears" of a set of Comp Cams Stainless Steel self aligning rocker arms - if steel rocker arms can wear - you just know aluminum rockers would be worse. This was on a car that was tracked, and saw 20 minute sessions where the RPM's rarely dropped below 3,000 - but still ... not a good thing to see. I was able to get a set of 1.6:1 Comp Cams Stainless steel rockers with polylocks under the stock valve covers of a 92 (that had the magnesium covers) - yes some work with a die grinder was needed, but they did fit...
Reply
Corvette Stories

The Best of Corvette for Corvette Enthusiasts

story-0

150 hp to 1,250 hp: Every Corvette Generation Compared by the Specs That Matter

 Joe Kucinski
story-1

8 Coolest Corvette Pace Cars (and Replicas) of All Time

 Verdad Gallardo
story-2

Top 10 Corvette Engines RANKED by Peak Torque (70+ Years of Muscle!)

 Joe Kucinski
story-3

Corvette ZR1X Will Be Pacing the Indy 500, And Could Probably Race, Too!

 Verdad Gallardo
story-4

Top 10 Corvettes Coming to Mecum Indy 2026!

 Brett Foote
story-5

Top 10 C9 Corvette MUST-HAVES to Fix These C8 Generation Flaws!

 Michael S. Palmer
story-6

10 Revolutionary 'Corvette Firsts' Most People Don't Know

 Joe Kucinski
story-7

5 Reasons to Upgrade to an LS6-Powered Corvette; 5 Reasons to Stay LT2

 Michael S. Palmer
story-8

2027 Corvette vs The World: Every C8 vs Its Closest Competitor

 Joe Kucinski
story-9

10 Most Common Corvette Problems of the Last 20 Years!

 Joe Kucinski
Old Dec 11, 2015 | 11:52 AM
  #9  
mtwoolford's Avatar
mtwoolford
Melting Slicks
10 Year Member
 
Joined: Jan 2009
Posts: 3,482
Likes: 195
From: folsom california
Default

Originally Posted by Purple92
mtwoolford ... If you do eventually change out the rockers - one of the reasons that I like the non-self aligning type is that on the self aligning rockers - the "ears" of the rocker arm are slightly below the roller tip - so those "ears" are what keeps the rocker in alignment with the top of the valve stem. I've seen significant wear on the "ears" of a set of Comp Cams Stainless Steel self aligning rocker arms - if steel rocker arms can wear - you just know aluminum rockers would be worse. This was on a car that was tracked, and saw 20 minute sessions where the RPM's rarely dropped below 3,000 - but still ... not a good thing to see. I was able to get a set of 1.6:1 Comp Cams Stainless steel rockers with polylocks under the stock valve covers of a 92 (that had the magnesium covers) - yes some work with a die grinder was needed, but they did fit...
just for the record; what precipitated replacing two rocker arms, stock, oem, self aligning, was finding one shifted entirely off the valve stem, the other partially off the valve stem; both had been damaged. I'm not a fan of self aligning rockers. Good to know about polylocks and compatibility with stock valve covers. Thanks
Reply
Old Dec 11, 2015 | 12:50 PM
  #10  
Blue Cheese's Avatar
Blue Cheese
Advanced
10 Year Member
Liked
Loved
 
Joined: May 2015
Posts: 53
Likes: 4
From: Montreal
Default

Guys, while we are in the area... is the LT1 a roller cam?
Reply
Old Dec 11, 2015 | 01:41 PM
  #11  
mtwoolford's Avatar
mtwoolford
Melting Slicks
10 Year Member
 
Joined: Jan 2009
Posts: 3,482
Likes: 195
From: folsom california
Default

Originally Posted by Blue Cheese
Guys, while we are in the area... is the LT1 a roller cam?
yes;

Last edited by mtwoolford; Dec 11, 2015 at 01:47 PM.
Reply
Old Dec 11, 2015 | 01:44 PM
  #12  
Blue Cheese's Avatar
Blue Cheese
Advanced
10 Year Member
Liked
Loved
 
Joined: May 2015
Posts: 53
Likes: 4
From: Montreal
Default

Originally Posted by mtwoolford
yes
Thank you Sir.
Reply
Old Dec 11, 2015 | 04:32 PM
  #13  
John A. Marker's Avatar
John A. Marker
Le Mans Master
15 Year Member
 
Joined: Mar 2004
Posts: 5,107
Likes: 171
From: Dublin CA
Default

When I blew the head gasket on my 95 LT1 in September of this year, while it was down I did several things. Gasket matched the heads, intake manifold and exhaust manifold. Replaced all the valve seals. Then since I had the springs off anyway...replaced stock springs with GM LS6 beehive springs GM 12499224. and used Comp Cam retainers 134-3701 on springs. Then installed 1.6 Scorpion SCP 1036 narrow self aligning roller rockers onto heads.

Last edited by John A. Marker; Dec 11, 2015 at 04:33 PM.
Reply
Old Dec 12, 2015 | 10:37 AM
  #14  
94VenomVette's Avatar
94VenomVette
Thread Starter
Racer
 
Joined: Sep 2015
Posts: 382
Likes: 17
Default

thanks for all the info everyone
Reply
Old Dec 12, 2015 | 05:35 PM
  #15  
Mishawaka's Avatar
Mishawaka
Pro
 
Joined: Nov 2014
Posts: 527
Likes: 23
From: Mishawaka Indiana
Default

If your just looking for a bit more HP then I would just go with the 1.6's. Easy to do and don't have to tear the opti out along with everything else. And costs a lot less.
Reply
Old Dec 12, 2015 | 06:17 PM
  #16  
Mishawaka's Avatar
Mishawaka
Pro
 
Joined: Nov 2014
Posts: 527
Likes: 23
From: Mishawaka Indiana
Default

Originally Posted by Mishawaka
If your just looking for a bit more HP then I would just go with the 1.6's. Easy to do and don't have to tear the opti out along with everything else. And costs a lot less.
I forgot to ask if you have a manual or auto transmission since the duration will be effected also, it shouldn't make a difference but wanted to let you know. Also, you may want to just install the 1.6's on the intake side.
Reply
Old Dec 15, 2015 | 05:36 PM
  #17  
Mr. Peabody's Avatar
Mr. Peabody
Le Mans Master
Supporting Lifetime
20 Year Member
Liked
 
Joined: Oct 2004
Posts: 7,706
Likes: 485
From: Everett WA
C4 of Year Finalist (appearance mods) 2019
Default

Back when my 95 had only 70K on it, I had the Hot Cam Kit installed along with the HD sprocket and timing chain kit. I had already had SE long tube headers installed but as mentioned previously when installing a cam a good retune is needed to yield the best results from the cam.

The car was dynoed on the same mustang dyno both before and after the tune. I picked up just over 40 RWHP ( I asked for a conservative tune for drive-ability)

That was 60K ago and the car still runs great. I was pretty happy with the results of the hot cam kit.... and that coupled with the long tube headers ... results in a wonderful sounding car
Reply
Old Dec 16, 2015 | 12:21 AM
  #18  
mtwoolford's Avatar
mtwoolford
Melting Slicks
10 Year Member
 
Joined: Jan 2009
Posts: 3,482
Likes: 195
From: folsom california
Default

Originally Posted by Mr. Peabody
I was pretty happy with the results of the hot cam kit.... and that coupled with the long tube headers ... results in a wonderful sounding car.
A 96 LT4 with a Hot Cam and Corsa exhaust sounds pretty sweet too.
Reply
Old Dec 22, 2025 | 06:28 AM
  #19  
Jo bar's Avatar
Jo bar
Advanced
All Eyes On Me
Liked
 
Joined: Nov 2021
Posts: 83
Likes: 2
Default

Hi, did you update the ECU or the EPROM after the cams?
Reply

Get notified of new replies

To valvetrain question





All times are GMT -4. The time now is 02:18 AM.

story-0
150 hp to 1,250 hp: Every Corvette Generation Compared by the Specs That Matter

Slideshow: From C1 to C8 we compare every Corvette generation by the numbers.

By Joe Kucinski | 2026-05-12 16:54:12


VIEW MORE
story-1
8 Coolest Corvette Pace Cars (and Replicas) of All Time

Slideshow: Some Corvette pace cars became collectible legends, while others perfectly captured the look and attitude of their era.

By Verdad Gallardo | 2026-05-11 09:50:51


VIEW MORE
story-2
Top 10 Corvette Engines RANKED by Peak Torque (70+ Years of Muscle!)

Slideshow: Ranking the top 10 Corvette engines by torque output.

By Joe Kucinski | 2026-05-05 11:58:09


VIEW MORE
story-3
Corvette ZR1X Will Be Pacing the Indy 500, And Could Probably Race, Too!

Slideshow: A Corvette pace car nearly matching IndyCar speeds sounds exaggerated, until you look at the numbers.

By Verdad Gallardo | 2026-05-04 20:03:36


VIEW MORE
story-4
Top 10 Corvettes Coming to Mecum Indy 2026!

Among a rather large group of them.

By Brett Foote | 2026-05-04 13:56:44


VIEW MORE
story-5
Top 10 C9 Corvette MUST-HAVES to Fix These C8 Generation Flaws!

Slideshow: the top 10 things Corvette owners want in the C9 Corvette

By Michael S. Palmer | 2026-04-30 12:41:15


VIEW MORE
story-6
10 Revolutionary 'Corvette Firsts' Most People Don't Know

Slideshow: 10 Important Corvette 'firsts' that every fan should know.

By Joe Kucinski | 2026-04-29 17:02:16


VIEW MORE
story-7
5 Reasons to Upgrade to an LS6-Powered Corvette; 5 Reasons to Stay LT2

Slideshow: Should you buy a 2020-2026 Corvette or wait for 2027?

By Michael S. Palmer | 2026-04-22 10:08:58


VIEW MORE
story-8
2027 Corvette vs The World: Every C8 vs Its Closest Competitor

Slideshow: 2027 Corvette lineup vs the world.

By Joe Kucinski | 2026-04-24 16:12:42


VIEW MORE
story-9
10 Most Common Corvette Problems of the Last 20 Years!

Slideshow: 10 major Corvette problems from the last 20 years.

By Joe Kucinski | 2026-04-14 16:37:05


VIEW MORE