L98 head gasket question
After a bat to get the heads off removing the old head gaskets I noticed the water jacket holes in the block and Alum, cylinder heads were about the size between a quarter and a nickel however the OEM gasket and my new Felpro set have holes about the size of a pencil.
Seems to me this small gasket hole would restrict water flow through the heads thus causing overheating?
I am considering punching out these gasket holes to fit the head and block is that a mistake?
Why would the gaskets holes be so small?
what head gasket are you ordering to replace your 88?
Last edited by BOOT77; Jan 10, 2016 at 05:19 AM.
I've read that most aluminum head L98's have head gasket issues at either #7 or #8 cylinders. this happens to be at the same location as the restrictors. along with the restrictors, GM installed a STEAM tube on the intake with the aluminum heads. I don't know about you guys, but the word STEAM scares the crap out of me, especially with creating steam from antifreeze. I have read that several members have installed non-restrictor manifold gaskets without issues. on my 90, I installed manifold gaskets from an iron head L98 (fel-pro, open rear ports). it's been two years now (about 6-7K miles), and I haven't noticed any temperature problems. it's running fine - performance, engine temps - everything seems normal even with the hot florida summers. BTW, running a 180 degree stat. just my 2-cents -
Last edited by Joe C; Jan 10, 2016 at 06:58 AM.
I've read that most aluminum head L98's have head gasket issues at either #7 or #8 cylinders. this happens to be at the same location as the restrictors. along with the restrictors, GM installed a STEAM tube on the intake with the aluminum heads. I don't know about you guys, but the word STEAM scares the crap out of me, especially with creating steam from antifreeze. I have read that several members have installed non-restrictor manifold gaskets without issues. on my 90, I installed manifold gaskets from an iron head L98 (fel-pro, open rear ports). it's been two years now (about 6-7K miles), and I haven't noticed any temperature problems. it's running fine - performance, engine temps - everything seems normal even with the hot florida summers. BTW, running a 180 degree stat. just my 2-cents -

It did appear the problem cylinders were #7 and #8 as Joe C. had said.
So I still am in a quagmire whether opening the new head gasket holes a little or enough to match the block would do any harm?
Boot77 mentioned over sizing holes in the castings/blocks but how about just the head gasket? what could be the harm?
They are the correct gasket Felpro set from my Actual auto parts store not O'rieily , they actually know about cars.
To answer Vikingtrad3R, the Felpro set covers 86 to 91 , 5.7 l, engines # HS-7733 PT-9
So bottom line? any harm in opening the coolant holes in the new head gaskets a small amount???
1984Z51auto I guess what you say makes sense but do you think there would be any harm in say just doubling the hole size? As I said the blocks holes are slightly smaller than a quarter and the head gast is about the size of a pencil, big difference as Joe C said he used head gaskets for the iron heads and has had no problems for 7K miles.?
It did appear the problem cylinders were #7 and #8 as Joe C. had said.
So I still am in a quagmire whether opening the new head gasket holes a little or enough to match the block would do any harm?
Boot77 mentioned over sizing holes in the castings/blocks but how about just the head gasket? what could be the harm?
They are the correct gasket Felpro set from my Actual auto parts store not O'rieily , they actually know about cars.
To answer Vikingtrad3R, the Felpro set covers 86 to 91 , 5.7 l, engines # HS-7733 PT-9
So bottom line? any harm in opening the coolant holes in the new head gaskets a small amount???
1984Z51auto I guess what you say makes sense but do you think there would be any harm in say just doubling the hole size? As I said the blocks holes are slightly smaller than a quarter and the head gast is about the size of a pencil, big difference as Joe C said he used head gaskets for the iron heads and has had no problems for 7K miles.?
The Best of Corvette for Corvette Enthusiasts
I would think that if all holes were the same size for example, there would be regions within the cooling jacket that would never be allowed to flow out towards the rad.
Im no expert and this is just brainstorming but i would think thw front of the block would circulate nicely, but the rear may not.
unless the cooling jacket is like a guided river passageway that flows theough a circuitous pathway theough the hole block. my impression is that its not though.
So i could see why, based on flow dynamics, the gaskets may be designed with restricted ports on the gaskets to increase pressure through that hole purely to ensure that the coolant trying to travel through that coolant pssage actually flows as opposed to being bavkpressured by some larger faster moving coolant.
So, id want to understand the engineering behind the restricted holes, clearly intentional, before changing them. Ironically, you could reduce flow theough a hole if it is a low pressure zone in the coolant jacket by opening the holes up in the gasket.
just thinking outloud.
It did appear the problem cylinders were #7 and #8 as Joe C. had said.
So I still am in a quagmire whether opening the new head gasket holes a little or enough to match the block would do any harm?
Boot77 mentioned over sizing holes in the castings/blocks but how about just the head gasket? what could be the harm?
They are the correct gasket Felpro set from my Actual auto parts store not O'rieily , they actually know about cars.
To answer Vikingtrad3R, the Felpro set covers 86 to 91 , 5.7 l, engines # HS-7733 PT-9
So bottom line? any harm in opening the coolant holes in the new head gaskets a small amount???
1984Z51auto I guess what you say makes sense but do you think there would be any harm in say just doubling the hole size? As I said the blocks holes are slightly smaller than a quarter and the head gast is about the size of a pencil, big difference as Joe C said he used head gaskets for the iron heads and has had no problems for 7K miles.?
I would think that if all holes were the same size for example, there would be regions within the cooling jacket that would never be allowed to flow out towards the rad.
Im no expert and this is just brainstorming but i would think thw front of the block would circulate nicely, but the rear may not.
unless the cooling jacket is like a guided river passageway that flows theough a circuitous pathway theough the hole block. my impression is that its not though.
So i could see why, based on flow dynamics, the gaskets may be designed with restricted ports on the gaskets to increase pressure through that hole purely to ensure that the coolant trying to travel through that coolant pssage actually flows as opposed to being bavkpressured by some larger faster moving coolant.
So, id want to understand the engineering behind the restricted holes, clearly intentional, before changing them. Ironically, you could reduce flow theough a hole if it is a low pressure zone in the coolant jacket by opening the holes up in the gasket.
just thinking outloud.
What are your thoughts on enlarging the head gasket coolant holes to the heads even a small amount?














