When you click on links to various merchants on this site and make a purchase, this can result in this site earning a commission. Affiliate programs and affiliations include, but are not limited to, the eBay Partner Network.
Has anyone done an lsx swap in a C4 but used the 4+3 tranny?
Ive been gathering parts to swap into my thirdgen but I'm much rather swap my '88. I already have the 621 big block bellhousing as well as ls1 intake and f-body oil pan. Using the factory 4+3 would take care of the c-beam adapter issue. Also I was thinking a hydraulic TOB would have to be used since the 621 doesn't have the mount for the slave cyl.
Last edited by armybyrd; Dec 14, 2016 at 04:09 PM.
The 4+3 is just a Borg super t10 with an od on the back.There is a guy in a youtube vid that explains how to do this.I think the formula was a 4.8 pick up flywheel+ 2004-2006 gto pilot bearing + the correct spline count clutch disc.The pilot bearing was not driven completely in.The vid was done a tri5 chevy with ls motor+ super t10 trans.The part the has me wondering is that faxt that the standard sbc bell housing will bolt to the ls motor but you can only use 5 bell housing bolts.with the c4 not using a crossmember to hold up the rear of the trans I would be afraid of cracking a bell housing.On the modern lsx motors the bell housing to engine uses more bolts than the standard sbc .The bell housing also bolts to the oil pan.
I honestly think keeping the stock engine and swapping the tranny for a 6 speed would be a better upgrade than going LSx with the 4+3
well now I've got a few more months to decide which route to go since someone pulled out in front of me last night and I totaled the truck. Have a broken knee so it'll prob be awhile til I can drive a manual again.
I agree. The overdrive unit is a hand grenade with the pin pulled. The 4-speed section is a stout unit, but it shifts like its from the 1960's. A modern 6-speed with a stock shifter will shift a lot better than fully tuned up T10.
although this is true it would still be a slow L98 even after a 6 speed swap. I've got most of the parts needed for the lsx swap-just need a wastegate, bov hydraulic tob and maybe one of two other parts. My 4+3 has never given me any issues in the ten years I've owned the car. Plus I figured it would make things easier not having to come up with a c-beam mount/adapter.
Last edited by armybyrd; Dec 17, 2016 at 09:11 PM.
I bought a C-beam adapter as it was cheaper than buying a wire feed welder, but it wouldn't be hard to fab up. The LSx swap with forced induction will make a T56 swap look like a cake walk. It is your car, follow your muse. There is certainly room here for the combo you are thinking of. I hope your injury heals up quick.
where did you buy an adapter?
I appreciate the sympathy from my accident-getting knee surgery Tuesday and decided to get a lawyer also since it wasn't my fault.
In the meantime reading about car stuff will be about all I can do. :/
Last edited by armybyrd; Dec 18, 2016 at 05:39 PM.
I have to agree with most everything said here. I've replaced my 4+3 with a T56, and still slogging the L98. I wouldn't even entertain the thought of a stock LS with the 4+3. It shouldn't be too hard to source an engine/trans combo. Search this forum and you'll see pictures of the Tommy Speed adapter and a few others. Talk to a welder/fabricator and it shouldn't be that hard to reverse-engineer what's needed.
And if you're serious about going turbo you might even want to consider a 4L80E.
well ive been follwing the comments here. i was going to swap in an lq9 and keep the 4+3. i read they were good for up to 375 hp which is more than ill make.
so guys is it truly a grenade issue or is it a keeping the rpm in the powerband issue?
like im doing a budget (as much as they can be) and this is why i was going to keep the 4+3.
Not only that, i was going to hpde it and just never use the od during that. its the 86 where i can turn off the od with a simple push of the button.
There seems to be some confusion. When I made this thread I was asking about what was needed to make the tranny work. I could care less about everyone's personal opinions on the tranny. Same responses one would get when inquiring about anything to do with a t5 which I have behind a vortec 350 that's doing just fine.
Anytime I get into something I like to do my research online which a buddy always gives me crap for since it would seem a lot of forum guys reiterate what they've heard online with no firsthand knowledge or no fab skills. Now I'm not saying everyone but def a good share online. A buddy of mine has a t5 behind a 5.3 that's holding up just fine fwiw.
anyways i think I'll be able to figure the setup out-I've got a 621 bellhousing, lsx flywheel and I was counting on a hydraulic tob and my current 4+3 clutch. That leaves the starter.
Last edited by armybyrd; Dec 20, 2016 at 01:40 PM.
There seems to be some confusion. When I made this thread I was asking about what was needed to make the tranny work. I could care less about everyone's personal opinions on the tranny. Same responses one would get when inquiring about anything to do with a t5 which I have behind a vortec 350 that's doing just fine.
Anytime I get into something I like to do my research online which a buddy always gives me crap for since it would seem a lot of forum guys reiterate what they've heard online with no firsthand knowledge or no fab skills. Now I'm not saying everyone but def a good share online. A buddy of mine has a t5 behind a 5.3 that's holding up just fine fwiw.
anyways i think I'll be able to figure the setup out-I've got a 621 bellhousing, lsx flywheel and I was counting on a hydraulic tob and my current 4+3 clutch. That leaves the starter.