Doug Nash 4+3
#21
Burning Brakes
To the O.P. I unfortunately don't share such a glowing history with my 4+3. I think a lot of their reputation is due to some shoddy production from Doug Nash Engineering (IIRC the carrier (ball) bearings were assembled with too much lash to preload). Yes they shift/feel differently than the later ZF. I didn't mind the "old school" feel and button OD, but it just didn't hold up (rebuilt professionally back in "94, carrier bearing failure again in 2012).
My advice, drive it. If you don't mind the feel and it shifts, OD engages without hickups it maybe OK. Maintain it, drive it correctly. If it's starting to have issues, don't buy it. If you own it and it's starting to have issues get it rebuilt NOW (before it blows up and becomes unrepairable) or end up swapping to a T5 or T56.
My advice, drive it. If you don't mind the feel and it shifts, OD engages without hickups it maybe OK. Maintain it, drive it correctly. If it's starting to have issues, don't buy it. If you own it and it's starting to have issues get it rebuilt NOW (before it blows up and becomes unrepairable) or end up swapping to a T5 or T56.
Last edited by DanZ51; 01-22-2017 at 01:55 AM.
#22
Instructor
Well, here's my experience with the 4+3: I bought my '85 back in 2013 and was willfully ignorant about the signs. The transmission was very difficult to get into gear and had pronounced gear whine but engaged/disengaged overdrive pretty smoothly and operated normally. The ATF in the overdrive unit which was burned and really nasty (along with the gear oil, explaining shifting resistance), suggesting that the crucial regular maintenance was neglected. I changed it along with the filter as soon as I started driving the car and did it a year after that as a precaution. Not long after, the transmission started grinding into reverse (this and gear whine are a sign of a bad carrier/thrust bearing, common especially on '84 and '85 cars). I drove it about 10,000 miles that way without any other additional problems until a clutch replacement.
A hundred miles or so after a clutch replacement (and everything that goes along with it, incl. hydraulics), the car began to slip in direct drive and overdrive. I naturally attributed this to the recent clutch replacement, and the slippage only became worse over time. I replaced the clutch with only about 500 miles and had everything thoroughly examined, coming up with nothing. The slippage persisted afterwards, only getting worse. The car is now all but undriveable and feels as if the clutch is just 50% engaged under load when warmed up; while OD still engages and disengages, I attribute the slippage to a failure in the overdrive which uses friction plates. However, I think that a complete rebuild is still in order because of the thrust bearing symptom. Sorry to thread hijack, but if anyone here has any experience with such a problem, I'd really appreciate any input.
In any event, I really like these transmissions. I now own another 4+3-equipped car that will be a project rather than a donor. It's a neat system that also works surprisingly well, and the Super T-10 section is pretty bullet proof. Rebuilt overdrive units and well-maintained '86+ units seem to do quite well in terms of reliability and it's a fun gearbox to use in my experience. These 4-speed manuals feel a bit dated but are great to row, and the ability to have the tall ratios on the highway is more than welcome. The fact that overdrive is available whenever you want and engages automatically is another neat aspect. Despite my experience, I wouldn't be deterred from a C4 by this transmission but would pay special attention to reverse engagement, overdrive engagement, slippage, and transmission noises. They really are fun to use and I won't be swapping mine despite that route being financially justifiable. As an added bonus, clutches and the 143 tooth flywheels ('84-'85) are inexpensive.
A hundred miles or so after a clutch replacement (and everything that goes along with it, incl. hydraulics), the car began to slip in direct drive and overdrive. I naturally attributed this to the recent clutch replacement, and the slippage only became worse over time. I replaced the clutch with only about 500 miles and had everything thoroughly examined, coming up with nothing. The slippage persisted afterwards, only getting worse. The car is now all but undriveable and feels as if the clutch is just 50% engaged under load when warmed up; while OD still engages and disengages, I attribute the slippage to a failure in the overdrive which uses friction plates. However, I think that a complete rebuild is still in order because of the thrust bearing symptom. Sorry to thread hijack, but if anyone here has any experience with such a problem, I'd really appreciate any input.
In any event, I really like these transmissions. I now own another 4+3-equipped car that will be a project rather than a donor. It's a neat system that also works surprisingly well, and the Super T-10 section is pretty bullet proof. Rebuilt overdrive units and well-maintained '86+ units seem to do quite well in terms of reliability and it's a fun gearbox to use in my experience. These 4-speed manuals feel a bit dated but are great to row, and the ability to have the tall ratios on the highway is more than welcome. The fact that overdrive is available whenever you want and engages automatically is another neat aspect. Despite my experience, I wouldn't be deterred from a C4 by this transmission but would pay special attention to reverse engagement, overdrive engagement, slippage, and transmission noises. They really are fun to use and I won't be swapping mine despite that route being financially justifiable. As an added bonus, clutches and the 143 tooth flywheels ('84-'85) are inexpensive.
Last edited by C4+3=/=C7; 01-22-2017 at 07:48 PM.
#23
was browsing my photos and here is what i found when i did my fluid change when i picked up the $650 86 with the 4+3.
no metal. just clutch materia and the fluid looked like gravy. no smell.
im betting it had never been changed.
mine still operates the OD just fine.
no metal. just clutch materia and the fluid looked like gravy. no smell.
im betting it had never been changed.
mine still operates the OD just fine.
#24
Instructor
As long as the car is stopped (not rolling) any difficulty with reverse engagement, particularly "grinding" is a clutch problem. NOT a transmission or overdrive problem. Reverse grinding can also be a pilot bearing problem.
If the transmission input shaft is turning because of a dragging clutch, or dragging pilot bearing, it WILL grind into reverse. These maladies also cause a difficult engagement into 1st, but it shouldn't grind because 1st is syncro'd. Reverse is not.
If the transmission input shaft is turning because of a dragging clutch, or dragging pilot bearing, it WILL grind into reverse. These maladies also cause a difficult engagement into 1st, but it shouldn't grind because 1st is syncro'd. Reverse is not.
Last edited by C4+3=/=C7; 01-27-2017 at 09:31 PM.
#25
Instructor
There is some pretty good info here...
http://www.corvetteactioncenter.com/...-unit-610.html
Even more...
http://www.5speeds.com/dne.htm
Good luck... GUSTO
http://www.corvetteactioncenter.com/...-unit-610.html
Even more...
http://www.5speeds.com/dne.htm
Good luck... GUSTO
The youtube channel is http://www.gearboxvideo.com
-- Paul
#26
#27
If I am correct, on my "1988" the OD engages automatically in 2-3-4 and shuts off either with the on/off button or fast acceleration. It will work in 1st (no need really), but it is not automatically engaged, you would need to use the OD button to put it on in 1st.
I always liked the DN 4+3, maybe cause it is basically an old style 4 speed and the OD was kind of cool in the 80's.! That said, a 5 or 6 speed would have also been fun too, which of course they changed to in "89".
Was fine for many many years, just had it completely serviced last year, now hopefully will be fine again for many more.! : )
I always liked the DN 4+3, maybe cause it is basically an old style 4 speed and the OD was kind of cool in the 80's.! That said, a 5 or 6 speed would have also been fun too, which of course they changed to in "89".
Was fine for many many years, just had it completely serviced last year, now hopefully will be fine again for many more.! : )
Last edited by Ralph88; 05-06-2017 at 03:21 PM.
#29
yyeesss!!!!!
#30
Team Owner
Certain combinations of RPM/Speed will allow OD to remain on in 1st if you've been rowing the gears down without first disabling OD in a higher gear. It doesn't take much for it to disable.
Attached is the chart from the factory chip. If you're doing less than 12MPH all it takes is 1.95% TPS to disable the OD. I have yet to find anyone doing 100 MPH in 1st to test 50%.
Attached is the chart from the factory chip. If you're doing less than 12MPH all it takes is 1.95% TPS to disable the OD. I have yet to find anyone doing 100 MPH in 1st to test 50%.
#31
Team Owner
There actually is a "1st Gear Upshift" table in the ECM, but it's blanked out by default. I posted 1st Gear Downshift table from '87 in another post.
#32
I'll have a video series posting to Youtube soon on a complete rebuild. The pics from the action center were from an article I did years ago. I rebuilt them for GM, did the specials for Callaway and the Challenge cars.
The youtube channel is http://www.gearboxvideo.com
-- Paul
The youtube channel is http://www.gearboxvideo.com
-- Paul