C4 Tech/Performance L98 Corvette and LT1 Corvette Technical Info, Internal Engine, External Engine

94 coupe 160 thermostat?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 06-20-2017, 07:24 AM
  #1  
Torx40
Heel & Toe
Thread Starter
 
Torx40's Avatar
 
Member Since: Apr 2017
Location: Johns Creek Georgia
Posts: 22
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default 94 coupe 160 thermostat?

I just had my 94 lt1 thermostat replaced with a 180 degree unit... Same as the only me that was in there...The mechanic said there is a 160 unit available but he thought that might make it run to cold... I'm thinking there's no way a c4 can run too cold. Does anyone have experience with a 160 degree thermostat in this vehicle?
Any input on this would be helpful thanks
Old 06-20-2017, 07:27 AM
  #2  
TorchTarga94
Melting Slicks
 
TorchTarga94's Avatar
 
Member Since: Jul 2011
Location: Trinity FL
Posts: 2,577
Received 191 Likes on 158 Posts

Default

No it won't make it run too cool. I have one in my 94' along with the fans programmed to turn on a little earlier. Every little bit helps down here in the south.
Old 06-20-2017, 08:03 AM
  #3  
JimLentz
Melting Slicks
Support Corvetteforum!
 
JimLentz's Avatar
 
Member Since: Jan 2014
Location: Downers Grove Illinois
Posts: 2,474
Received 250 Likes on 239 Posts

Default

I had a car, not a Corvette, that I changed to a 160 degree thermostat. The A/C worked better, but the heat not as well. If you are in a warmer climate that shouldn't be a concern.
Old 06-20-2017, 09:22 AM
  #4  
SJW
Le Mans Master
 
SJW's Avatar
 
Member Since: May 2005
Location: Central Maryland
Posts: 6,379
Received 1,389 Likes on 920 Posts

Default

I've been running a 160 in my '94 for years. Also lowered the fan on/off settings in the ECM. The car runs much cooler on hot days, and never too cold. A/C works fine, and plenty of heat on cold days. I would never make any changes to the way it is now set up.

Just be aware that the thermostat only sets the operating "floor" of the cooling system. If you want the car to idle at lower temps, you'll also need to re-program the fan settings to kick them on at a lower temperature.

Live well,

SJW
Old 06-20-2017, 09:28 AM
  #5  
cv67
Team Owner
 
cv67's Avatar
 
Member Since: Oct 2004
Location: altered state
Posts: 81,242
Received 3,043 Likes on 2,602 Posts
St. Jude Donor '05

Default

x2
if you do both like SJW said only then will it benefit you . In a warm climate its the way to go. If you get a lot of snow Id go 180
Old 06-20-2017, 09:31 AM
  #6  
billschroeder5842
Zen Vet Master Level VII

Support Corvetteforum!
 
billschroeder5842's Avatar
 
Member Since: Mar 2016
Location: Southlake, TX
Posts: 5,121
Received 1,140 Likes on 845 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by SJW
I've been running a 160 in my '94 for years. Also lowered the fan on/off settings in the ECM.... you'll also need to re-program the fan settings to kick them on at a lower temperature.
Can you share how to do that?
Old 06-20-2017, 10:36 AM
  #7  
DGXR
Melting Slicks
 
DGXR's Avatar
 
Member Since: May 2013
Location: Sacramento California
Posts: 2,692
Received 346 Likes on 300 Posts
Default

Regardless of thermostat, at some point the cooling capacity of the system will be the limiting factor for how cool the engine runs. An open thermostat is an open thermostat and if the overall cooling system does not have additional cooling capacity, the thermostat won't matter.

If you want the engine to run cooler, keep the 180F thermostat, get an aftermarket radiator and reprogram the fans to turn on somewhere below 228F. Don't go crazy though. You don't want your fans running all the time and burning out.

Last edited by DGXR; 06-20-2017 at 10:38 AM.
Old 06-20-2017, 10:50 AM
  #8  
Tom400CFI
Team Owner
Pro Mechanic
 
Tom400CFI's Avatar
 
Member Since: Aug 2004
Location: Park City Utah
Posts: 21,544
Received 3,181 Likes on 2,322 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by DGXR
Regardless of thermostat, at some point the cooling capacity of the system will be the limiting factor for how cool the engine runs. An open thermostat is an open thermostat and if the overall cooling system does not have additional cooling capacity, the thermostat won't matter.
This is 100% true and accurate.

However, most if not all cooling systems should have quite a bit more capacity than the car needs; it has to meet the criteria for places like Death Valley, the "Davis Dam grade", running WOT/high RPM on a track, etc. Now, compare those conditions with the conditions that most of us operate under; ~100*F or less, typically a 500 - 2500 RPM operating range (perhaps short bursts higher than that)...with all that in mind, there should be, and there is on a well maintained system quite a bit of extra capacity.

That is the reason why you see people posting that a cooler stat has helped them run cooler temps; the system has the capacity to drive the temps down toward or to, the lower stat's opening temp, under many or most conditions.

When you see posts where a lower stat didn't help, that is likely because that poster didn't have a well maintained cooling system, and they've lost capacity w/o knowing it. They blame the stat change for not helping, when in fact the cooling system is inefficient due to blockage, contamination, etc.
The following 2 users liked this post by Tom400CFI:
BlowerWorks (06-20-2017), STL94LT1 (06-20-2017)

Get notified of new replies

To 94 coupe 160 thermostat?




Quick Reply: 94 coupe 160 thermostat?



All times are GMT -4. The time now is 08:55 PM.