When you click on links to various merchants on this site and make a purchase, this can result in this site earning a commission. Affiliate programs and affiliations include, but are not limited to, the eBay Partner Network.
I'll never have an airfoil after hearing about some guy who's motor was destroyed after the screw came loose, went through the plenum, down the runners, and into the motor. :U
Well I gained 54 hp at the rear wheels with one. :D :D Actually I bought a Ed Wright chip off of a member and he threw in a air foil and a LT1 throttle plate. With both installed I am running 2 tenths quicker then before, but I believe it is due to the engine running cooler and possibably some other changes with the chip. I believe they are a waste of money, but what the heck, I got one anyways.
I'll never have an airfoil after hearing about some guy who's motor was destroyed after the screw came loose, went through the plenum, down the runners, and into the motor. :U
Was this the fault of the airfoil itself or the guy who didn't istall it correctly? Hopefully when I get my motor done this winter, I can get it on the dyno so I can run a series of hp tests: airfoil, 48mm/52mm/?mm throtle body, and some other little "secrets" that work on carburated engines to see what effect they have on an injected engine. When and if I can set this up, I'll post it so we will all know for sure! It would be interesting to have somebody do some of the changes at the dragstrip also! :cheers:
Pontiac performance did a dyno test a while ago on a tpi firebird and picked up a few hp and about 8 lbs of torque if memory serves with an airfoil. It wasn't the alum type that bolts in, but a composite(aka plastic) one that fits on the opening of the t/b and in the duct. I'll have to dig out the article and find out which brand it was, but I want to say Holley.
No one I've known has felt a difference with one, though. Just thought I would throw out the Pontiac mag's test to play devil's advocate.
Got one the 1st year I got the car. The car defenately felt a bit peppier. Revved quicker it seemed like...Just think of the design of it and see it helps a bit...For the screw to come out and get lose it had to be either put in incorrectly or was not tight enuff. I had mine on the TB for about 3 years without taking it off, and it is still solid on there... So it adds 1-6hp... Lot of 'little' things add to a big one..
Pontiac performance did a dyno test a while ago on a tpi firebird and picked up a few hp and about 8 lbs of torque if memory serves with an airfoil.
GM high tech perf. magazine did a dyno test of the Holley aif foil, and picked up 5 rwhp. This was on an LT1 F body. Part 2 Grapes of Wrath Project- running 12's with just bolt ons, not removing valve covers. I am watching this project closely, I'm at 13.4 so far and that is with my fat butt and street tires.
The 1 or 2 HP you will gain w/ the air foil is offset by the weight of it. Some one is getting rich off selling a crude piece of cast aluminum for $40-$50. It probably costs them $1 to cast & machine a hole & throw in a screw w/ it. Big Scam. I dont think there has been much developement or research put into these gimmicks. GM made on the average 25,000 c4 vettes each year & the airfoil fits 84-96, so 25,000 x 12 years is 300,000 c4's. If only 1 out of every 5 c4 owner buys a airfoil at $40 each thats a $2.4 million market for airfoils!
it works . ive seen too mant dyno tests on it. just look at the design, you really want your intake flowing into that ugly space between the throttle blades?? didnt think so. for $45 it at least gives you the nice feeling that air isnt hitting a wall.
Hi. I have an 85 4+3.
What Mid America do not tell about the airfoil is the following:
If all the intake entities (plenum, runners intake manifold and heads) are strongly modified so that they do not limit the airflow, then the airfoil will work and you will have some better flow in the throttlebody and that could be about 11hp. If there are limitations in the intake the airfoil will help you less and less the more limits you have in the other part of the intake.
The airfoilwill, however, make the flow better through the throttlebody so you can achieve some better throttleresponse but do not wait for more hp in a stock car. It is not a seat of the pants feeling. If you change to another chip then you will optimise the fuel and ignition curves so you will get some more hp. If you have an airfoil and change the chip and you feel that the engine is stronger yhen it is the chip more than the airfoil you feel
The 1 or 2 HP you will gain w/ the air foil is offset by the weight of it. Some one is getting rich off selling a crude piece of cast aluminum for $40-$50. It probably costs them $1 to cast & machine a hole & throw in a screw w/ it. Big Scam. I dont think there has been much developement or research put into these gimmicks. GM made on the average 25,000 c4 vettes each year & the airfoil fits 84-96, so 25,000 x 12 years is 300,000 c4's. If only 1 out of every 5 c4 owner buys a airfoil at $40 each thats a $2.4 million market for airfoils!
How much does yours weigh? I made one for my vette that is much bigger that any I've seen for sale, and mine only weighs a couple of ounces!. The next time I get to test and tune, I'm going to do a couple passes with mine, and a couple with out, then I'll know for sure! :D I can feel a difference with it in, so I'm sure it is worth it. :cheers:
also, all the aftermarket t/b's out there have the middle section already machined like the airfoil.
YES YES YES, by george I think he's got it! If it wasn't worth it, the aftermarket companies would not if spent the extra time/money to finish theirs off to have a built in airfoil design!!!! :cheers: