R12 replacement
THANKS
I drew a vacuum on the system for an hour, let it sit overnight to check for leaks, charged it up and now I have 40 degree air blowing from my center vents.
I too asked about, and considered converting to R134.... I did the price comparison of a new dryer, the O-Rings, the orifice that needs to be changed, the 134 refrigerant, the flush solution to get all of the old incompatible oil, and the time it takes to swap and flush everything out. It was cheaper and faster to just buy the R-12 and recharge it. The systems in our cars were designed for R12, which is a more efficient refrigerant. I have spoken to others that converted (not just Vettes) and many have said that their AC charged with R134 doesn't get as cold as the R12 originally did.
I figure as long as it is still available (R12), I'm going to purchase and use it.
Jared
- most C4's were designed for R12, HOWEVER, R12 is NOT a more efficient refrigerant.Pound for pound R134a is a more efficient refrigerant than R12, however it runs at higher pressures in some aspects and therefore requires more effective condensing. Whether R134a performs as well as R12 in any given a/c system depends upon system components and the amount of R134a used.
Given two identical vehicles, each with the same weighted amount of refrigerant, the vehicle with the R134a has the “capability” to remove more heat (measured in btu’s) from the vehicle than the same type of vehicle using the same amount of R12.
The most common influences which effect the capability of R134a to perform well are the condenser, in some cases the superheat setting of the expansion valve or the amount of R134a. Condensers designed to release greater amounts of heat help to expel the greater amount of heat which R134a removes from the car’s interior. And by “matching” the correct amount of R134a to use in a given vehicle, correcting the superheat of the expansion valve (if necessary), you can in some manner nearly balance or match the amount of heat drawn out by the evaporator and released by the condenser.
These efforts to “balance” the system can not be realized if there are problems within the a/c system, such as: poor performing compressor, dirty condenser or poor air flow through the condenser, malfunctioning expansion valve, water or air in the system, improperly operating fresh air or heat input in the climate-air mixing system.
additional - https://pdfs.semanticscholar.org/e1f...e27937a8a2.pdf -- very good reading.
Last edited by Joe C; May 24, 2019 at 03:14 AM.
I also converted my GM Pickup truck's Air conditioning to R134 and had the same success on this vehicle. I did my VW Syncro Vanagon's A/C and that was one of the easiest yet. The Germans were smart they mounted the AC equipment on the ceiling so the cold air comes down to you from the ceiling, what a great idea!
Over the years I have converted several people's cars as well as favors. I just did my Son's VW Passat yesterday and he was amazed at how easy it was to make COLD air. Having the right tools is important and Vacuum Pumps are not something you find in every garage. I do not have the capability to recover the old R-12 or the R-134 so I take the vehicle to a shop and have a buddy just remove the contents for me. This way they won't have to name a hole in the Ozone after me... The smartest thing I did was buy the leftover stock of a TRAK-AUTO parts store of their R-134 at less than a dollar a can. They had over three cases so I bought it all. I never thought that R-134 would go up that much in price.
My neighbor bought a kit off Fleabay to add to his R-12. It was a kit with three or four cans of refrigerant and some drying agent to put into the system. His car is a Porsche 944 and the low pressure fitting was under the engine and the high pressure was above the engine. Fortunately my gauges came with long hoses. I put the materials he purchased into his R-12 system and the car cools magnificently now. IF you HAVE to stay with R-12 that might be an option. I will learn what it was called and tell you if you are interested.
I would swap it to the less expensive R134 and live happily ever after if it was me doing it!
Here is hoping that your Corvette gets as cool as it can inside on those HOT summer days coming towards us.
Best Regards,
Chris
- from what I understand, it's against the (federal) law to import or manufacture new R12. anything you buy legally, that isn't NOS, is reclaimed and recycled R12. . Last edited by Joe C; May 23, 2019 at 12:09 PM.
The Best of Corvette for Corvette Enthusiasts
I drew a vacuum on the system for an hour, let it sit overnight to check for leaks, charged it up and now I have 40 degree air blowing from my center vents.
I too asked about, and considered converting to R134.... I did the price comparison of a new dryer, the O-Rings, the orifice that needs to be changed, the 134 refrigerant, the flush solution to get all of the old incompatible oil, and the time it takes to swap and flush everything out. It was cheaper and faster to just buy the R-12 and recharge it. The systems in our cars were designed for R12, which is a more efficient refrigerant. I have spoken to others that converted (not just Vettes) and many have said that their AC charged with R134 doesn't get as cold as the R12 originally did.
I figure as long as it is still available (R12), I'm going to purchase and use it.
Jared
I should have been more descriptive in my previous post when I said R12 is more efficient than R134A. R12 will do a better job of cooling when used in a system that was designed for R12. R134 used in a system that was designed for R12 will not do as well of a job without modifying the system.
A previous poster mentioned 55 degree air at idle, and 40 degree air while cruising with R134. I currently have 40 degree air at idle and could probably hang meat while cruising. I had to turn the AC off yesterday on my way to work because I got too cold. Black car, black top, 76 degrees out.
Three 14oz cans fills the system completely. 44oz is "My" systems total capacity, 8oz of oil and 36oz of refrigerant. Check the capacity of your system before you go forth with purchasing refrigerant.
This is all my own experience, others may have had different experiences. I decided to go with R12 because it was pretty much a "one step" operation.
Jared
Last edited by lotsofspareparts; May 23, 2019 at 02:51 PM. Reason: System Capacity differences






Bought a kit like this from Walmart a good 20 years ago because the r12 in my system leaked out after a recharge.
It still blows cold to this day and has never been touched
A previous poster mentioned 55 degree air at idle, and 40 degree air while cruising with R134. I currently have 40 degree air at idle and could probably hang meat while cruising. I had to turn the AC off yesterday on my way to work because I got too cold. Black car, black top, 76 degrees out.
But is that a good test of the system? I would think that a clean condenser running in 90 plus degrees of humid air in stop and go traffic is a much better test.
But is that a good test of the system? I would think that a clean condenser running in 90 plus degrees of humid air in stop and go traffic is a much better test.
-- 76° is no test. 76° is top down weather - 
my center duct temps, 40/55° are based on 90° days (with humidity) here in florida. running a "glass" top in stop and go traffic also taxes the system. that green house effect is a biotch -

by todays standards, the AC systems in C4's were not all that efficient. larger condensers, better fans and blowers, ducting and insulation would definitely help. bottom line - you can't get expect 2019 results out of something designed in the 80's. the technology just wasn't there -
-- 76° is no test. 76° is top down weather - 
my center duct temps, 40/55° are based on 90° days (with humidity) here in florida. running a "glass" top in stop and go traffic also taxes the system. that green house effect is a biotch -

by todays standards, the AC systems in C4's were not all that efficient. larger condensers, better fans and blowers, ducting and insulation would definitely help. bottom line - you can't get expect 2019 results out of something designed in the 80's. the technology just wasn't there -
Neither of those 2 cars seems to keep as cold as it is was before the conversation. Seems like a good 5 minutes longer to get to 65 to 70 in hot humid temperatures in the summer when I timed it eons ago. I don't have the test results but it didn't seem to work as well in traffic jams.
I don't. I was comparing 1991 R12 to R134A. I do a total conversion. New compressor, right oil, etc. Professional job. Clean up the friend's condenser with R12 ve my conversion on the C4 and my pre R134A to R12 in the F-body.





-- 76° is no test. 76° is top down weather - 
my center duct temps, 40/55° are based on 90° days (with humidity) here in florida. running a "glass" top in stop and go traffic also taxes the system. that green house effect is a biotch -

by todays standards, the AC systems in C4's were not all that efficient. larger condensers, better fans and blowers, ducting and insulation would definitely help. bottom line - you can't get expect 2019 results out of something designed in the 80's. the technology just wasn't there -
I respectfully disagree.....
The numbers don't lie....R12 in an R12 system.
-- peace and stay cool my friend - Last edited by Joe C; May 24, 2019 at 08:52 PM.





-- peace and stay cool my friend - Joe - I meant no disrespect with my last post, and I completely agree 100% with the clarified version of your of the original statement. From what I have read on the topic over the years, and the numbers I have seen other members post, I have drawn the conclusion that converting an R12 system to 134a will not give the performance that the system was originally designed for when using R12. A converted system will blow "cool" air, but not cold air.
The numbers that I posted were from my '76...which was even older technology.
Below is a shot from my '87. I didn't take a screenshot of the weather that day, but it was comparable to the weather on the day I snapped the stats from my '76. On the 87, I actually had to add an adjustable low pressure switch after installing a new parallel flow condenser. The parallel flow condensers are so much more efficient at thermal transfer than the tube & fin condensers that after charging the system to the recommended pressures in the FSM, I was getting icing on the evaporator core. Raising the cut off slightly on the low pressure side fixed that. Temp at the center vent was nearly dead on with that of the '76, both using R12.
My intent was merely to point out to the OP that keeping his R12 system original would give the optimum performance the system was designed for.
My current '86s performance is a mirror image of the picture above.
On a side note, I would love to see the results posted from someone who has converted one of these R12 systems to R134a AFTER having changed the condenser from tube & fin to parallel flow. Based on my condenser experience noted above, I believe that would have to make a difference in cooling...and all for the better!
Stay cool my friend!
Dave
















