When you click on links to various merchants on this site and make a purchase, this can result in this site earning a commission. Affiliate programs and affiliations include, but are not limited to, the eBay Partner Network.
So I am installing my Lloyd Elliot camshaft (custom grind which came from Lunati). The stock LT4 cam looks like it is all steel (billet) vs the new Lunatis which looks cast iron (rough casting between the lobes).
Will this be a problem with durability? I am going with all Lunati parts (rocker arms, springs, pushrods) per Lloyd Elliott's recommendation.
Roughness between the nodes just means it is cast, not cast iron. Industry has figured out how to cast steel equal to or exceeding forgings/billets. Ruger firearms are cast. So are others. They have proved to be just as strong as forged receivers (it is the receivers that are cast,forged or billet (think Remington 700)).
You can heat treat steel whether it is cast, billet or forged. It is all in the actual material and technique for the most part nowadays.
So if you are concerned, look into where the raw part came from and what material used is, not whether it is cast,billet or forged.
Unlikely Lunati would sell a cam designed to fail. The parting line in a casting usually will ID cast or forged. Forged will have wide parting line. It shouldn't be a thing until you get into strokers and 600+ lift cams and the extreme valve springs required.
Thanks guys for your info, I just didn't want to have any issues since I have the top end of the motor ripped apart. I only want to do this once and have it last a while.
I will say the engine is nice and clean, 25 years/47,000 miles of faithful oil changes and Mobil 1.
So far after tearing into my motor the only thing worn is the factory single roller timing chain, it was pretty sloppy! And of course some of the gaskets leaking.
The Cloyes replacement single roller chain and gears I am installing is much beefier.