When you click on links to various merchants on this site and make a purchase, this can result in this site earning a commission. Affiliate programs and affiliations include, but are not limited to, the eBay Partner Network.
Is the LT4 Manifold a regular LT1 manifold just powder coated or is it ported or something, also if it ported or anything, do you need to modify your heads to put one on. Also how much of a HP gain can you expect from just bolting it on. :steering:
I am/was under the impression that the castings are the same. However, let's see where this thread goes. The main obvious difference between the LT1/4 manifolds is obviously the fuel crossover tube close to the throttle body. More flow, more equalization from rail to rail, more go! :steering:
The LT4 intake casting is completly different than an LT1, it is cast to match the revised port configuration of the LT4 heads. (read raised runners)
The outside of the LT4 manifold has the raised runner, but the inside is the same old LT1 port. If you want your LT4 heads to use the LT4 intake manifold to it's full potential, you have to port the intake runners.
The funny side fact is that you can bolt the LT4 manifold to LT1 heads with no internal port mismatch. And you can bolt an LT1 manifold to LT4 heads with no loss of performance.
...The main obvious difference between the LT1/4 manifolds is obviously the fuel crossover tube close to the throttle body....
The crossover tube is present on all LT1 manilfolds from 94 and up. When GM went from batch fire to sequential injection they added the crossover tube.
I had LT1 heads and intakes & the LT4 equivalents here at the same time. I hand fit every conceivable combination. I even made templates to use in blueprinting/exact matching of the head-intake port interface.
The top of the LT4 intake ports hit way high on the LT1 heads. You could physically look & see how they revised the internal ports/passages on the LT4 intake & heads to decrease the sharp bend in the floor area that was required to enter the bowl area on the LT1 heads.
It really has very little to do with what you "see" at the port opening the actual flow gains are made inside the ports.
Why would GM cast the outside of an intake manifold differently?
The LT4 heads & Intake were engineered as a package to increase the horsepower in 96' from 300 in the LT1's to 330 in the LT4's.
Which also shows how much work is actually required to gain a "real" 30 HP.
...internal ports/passages on the LT4 intake & heads to decrease the sharp bend in the floor area that was required to enter the bowl area on the LT1 heads.
There's no "bend(s) in the intake manifold passage, it's a straight shot.
Why would GM cast the outside of an intake manifold differently?
The story I heard was that GM designed the LT4 heads, then when they started on the manifold, they just used the LT1 intake manilfold ports as a starting point. After they dyno'ed the set up, they already had 360HP, 30HP over the target so they never bothered to change the LT4 intake manilfold ports. There's 0.1" that needs to be ported on the top side of the LT4 intake manifold if you want to gasket match the intake to the heads. One of the forum members posted pictures last month.
The LT4 heads & Intake were engineered as a package to increase the horsepower in 96' from 300 in the LT1's to 330 in the LT4's.
Which also shows how much work is actually required to gain a "real" 30 HP.
More like 50-60HP gain with the cam and heads compared to the LT1.
Odd thing about the LT4 intake. I spoke to Pete at CNC Heads and he said the LT4 manifold is more restrictive than the LT1. This was done for emissions at idle and right off idle. He also said that his intake port job is good for 10 rwhp on a stock LT4 setup.
He says that with an LT4 you need to port the intake because there is a 12% flow restriction unlike the LT1 and won't do a head port job without the intake getting ported as well.
I still find myself not believing what I wrote above but that is what he said. Maybe I am mistaken? Call him to confirm if you like. Pete is "the man" at CNC Heads.
From: Austin, Singapore, Kuala Lumpur, Houston, Dallas, Hong Kong, Elgin, etc.. Texas
Re: LT-4 Intake Manifold (silver & red CE)
Here is a photo of across section of the LT4 intake manifold and cylinder head I found somewhere. Probably the http://www.LT4.com website.
After I pulled my intake and heads, I can say the cross section is accurate. The mismatch on the port roof to intake varies from .25" to .375". The reason its not constant is the injector boss starts in the intake and finishes just inside the head port.
I did the port matching myself to the intake to gasket #12367777. Trevor Johnson Cylinder Heads did the port matching on the head side. For more pictures see: http://www.corvetteforum.net/c4/tmezger/heads.shtml
agreed with superlund... the intakes and heads are from two different sides of the block. LT4 does have a raised roof runner, but also has a more efficient floor slope! I have ported many of them and can tell ya first hand. as for the LT4 not being as flow friendly as the LT1.. well i suppose thats one of those things to debate about... but if your going to do a combo... the LT4 castings have more meat and require less work then the LT1 manifold to fit on the LT4 heads. but either can be used with either with the correct porting done. the LT1 head will be significantely thinner on the roof if you are matching to the revised gasket from GM and have port matched both head and intake to the new gasket. the injector bosses will need some work in the manifold and the roof of the head at the mating surface will also need some special attention to get them perfect but once ya do... you have one hell of a combo!