When you click on links to various merchants on this site and make a purchase, this can result in this site earning a commission. Affiliate programs and affiliations include, but are not limited to, the eBay Partner Network.
I thought it would be as easy as updating the injector constant and then re-tuning VE. But, now I’m reading about injector offset tuning and I know nothing about that!
Why I’m considering a larger injector:
it’s a mostly “while I’m in there” and to have some buffer. It’s a 355 LT1 with LE ported heads and intake, larger valves, and mild cam. I plan on 6400 max but more likely 6200 rpm. I doubt I’m really maxing the 24s with this combo but I did see 90+% DC as I approached 6k rpm. The primary reason is I want to refresh the 30 year old injectors. I was initially going to just have my existing set refurbed by FIC, but then thought having some buffer and bringing down the DC in the high rpm would be nice and was considering the FIC injectors that they hog out to 30 lb.
am I nuts to consider 30# for this combo? Better served keeping 24# and refurbing my existing set? Just what is involved in adjusting the injector offset? My understanding is it is to keep it running smoothly in low rpm by ensuring the injector fires reliably at very small pulse width.
If you're looking for 30 lb/hr, I'd get 0280-155-759... they have the exact datasheet so you know you have the correct voltage offsets. I've been running them for a few years now.
The voltage offsets are there because injectors behave differently at different voltages. In order for the PCM to get the correct flow rate out of them at all times, it needs to be able to see the vehicle's system voltage and then an accurate voltage offset table so it can factor that into the pulse width calculation.
What you're thinking of is the low pulsewidth offset vs base pulsewidth table. On GM's earlier injectors, as I understand it, they weren't efficient at low pulsewidths, so they'd program in some additional pulsewidth in order to ensure the engine got the correct amount of fuel at low commanded pulsewidths.
I've tuned for different injectors a few times now. Like ULTM8Z said you just need the injector data. If you're using a GM factory injector instead of aftermarket you can look on other forums like HPTuners or even LS1Tech and find lots of injector data posted online.
am I nuts to consider 30# for this combo? Better served keeping 24# and refurbing my existing set? Just what is involved in adjusting the injector offset? My understanding is it is to keep it running smoothly in low rpm by ensuring the injector fires reliably at very small pulse width.
I wouldn't worry about that at all. I have 76 pound Holley's in mine and it runs great at low rpm. I think the idea of a large injector making low rpm tuning more difficult is a thing of the past with modern injectors. Think about it. In any GM flex fuel truck or SUV you have at least 36 pound injectors. When you are running pump gas that injector is only at 20-30% duty cycle. With E85 the PCM bumps that up to 50-60%. And they idle and run just fine.
To me if I was going through the trouble of tuning injector data I would go big enough that I knew it would be able to flow enough fuel for mods down the road. You can get GM 42 pounders that run very well. You would need injector hats and wiring adapters but there only around $100 a set.
PM me if interested. I think your 1994 is sequential EFI, so what I did may not be applicable since you have individual fuel trim capability (mine is batch fire).
But I can probably give you a deal on these four, then you can simply buy four more from Southbay.
The issue with large injectors is that they will run rich when operating at or below the minimum pulse width even with proper tuning.
The integrator will be reset to 128 and the calculated pulse width will be replaced by the default minimum pulse width. In this situation, the ecm cannot pull fuel. High rpm and light load is worse than idle. Double fire is worse than single fire.
The minimum pulse width and default pulse width settings must also be tuned properly for a given injector in order to minimize this issue.
Here is a log to illustrate the behavior after tuning (350 with (8) 60 lb/hr injectors in double fire mode running on E10 fuel):
For most of the log, the integrator is frozen and the car runs rich but is tolerable. Note how the periods with elevated idle speed (2500 rpm) are even worse than the normal 700 rpm idle speed. Keeping the idle rpm as low as possible and retarding spark advance are some methods to cope with richness due to injector and ecm limitations with large injectors.
Last edited by tequilaboy; Jan 16, 2024 at 03:01 AM.
But this is an extreme example, right? 60lb sounds like a huge injector for the application.
Not really. I drive 76 pound injectors on the street with no issues. It is true that it's more difficult for the ECU to regulate the fuel at lower rpm and a larger injector makes this worse. A lot of this has to deal with spray pattern. This is why the old Deka 80's won't idle as well as newer styles of injectors. But anymore new aftermarket (or OEM flex fuel) injectors do just fine as far as idle quality. If the car is tuned right you won't notice any low rpm issues especially with anything under 40 pounds. There are stock vehicles from the factory with bigger injectors than that.
Probably going with these. since they cross reference to the Ford red top SVO, is it fair to assume the voltage offset would follow that documented for the Fords?
Probably going with these. since they cross reference to the Ford red top SVO, is it fair to assume the voltage offset would follow that documented for the Fords?
Designer Imagines A Corvette That Looks More Like a Corvette Than the Corvette
Slideshow: A Jaguar designer's personal project imagines what a modern front-engined Corvette might look like if Chevrolet revisited the golden age of the Stingray.