When you click on links to various merchants on this site and make a purchase, this can result in this site earning a commission. Affiliate programs and affiliations include, but are not limited to, the eBay Partner Network.
I recently started replacing all the 120k mile rubber bushings in my rear suspension with poly and wow, what a difference. The feel for the road and the rear suspension is now greatly improved even though I've only done the control arms so far. The strut rods are next as the lateral stability of the rear end is really mushy.
It's this mushiness (don't you love the technical term?) that leads to my question. Now, I'm no engineer and I know this thing works, but I can't quite help feeling that in a rear lateral slide that undue stresses are being placed on those tie rods and that camber control could be greatly enhanced by adding some sort of strut rod to the top of the knuckle.
Your thoughts are absolutely right. That's why the C5 went to an arangement that has a top member.
Well, the difference with the C4 and C5 is that the halfshaft in the C5 is no longer a stressed member in tension or compression, but rather rotational only. In the C4 suspension, the halfshaft acts as a control arm, whereas the C5 halfshafts are driveaxles only. You do get a longer lever arm with the C5 setup for the control arm to work with, theoretically making it more stable than the C4 setup.
So, I'm guessing nobody or no company has addressed this, right? I haven't taken a look at the rear since last weekend before I started thinking about this, but I'm going to see what it would take to add an upper strut rod to the knuckle. Any suggestions? ANyone have any pix/links of the C5's rear suspension setup?
Not trying to dissuade you, but that sounds really tough. Our cars have 5 locating members, and your addition would be the 6th. If it's not done correctly it's just going to bind up.
If I were to install a strut rod for the top of the knuckle at static ride height then that rod would take the job of controlling camber away from the half-shaft and actually leave it subjected to less severe operating angles at any given moment of stress to the rear.
Since the half shaft itself does not cause any changes to camber (the cause comes from lateral force applied through the tire(s),) there would be no conflict between it and an added strut rod. No?
The C4 camber is controlled by the half shaft and the camber rod below it. To do the conversion that you are talking about, you will need to change the half shaft attachement. Either the axle housing end or the drive hub end must be changed so that the half shaft will be able to float right to left. otherwise the suspension would bind with the addition of a top link.
...and the suspension will bind because as it cycles the distance from the point at the hub/bearing to the output yoke on the diff changes. OK
I'm guessing that the outboard end can't be made to float because the bearing assembly needs the pressure on the inner race from the stub shaft and axle nut. That leaves the inboard half shaft connection. I'll take a look at my FSM tonight to see what can be done about that.
Nope, that won't work either. Looks like the only option is to replace the half shafts with ones that have a slip and splines built into them.
Then for the upper arm(s)...Looks like a solid bar, from knuckle to knuckle, attaching where the sway bar currently mounts and anchored to the diff would do the trick.
I'm wondering if all the extra weight and dollars would really be worth it.
You're talking about tons of work to fix something that ain't broken. With solid bushing, adjustable camber rods, and the right shock / spring rates, I can corner almost 1g on street tires.
If you're generating more side load cause you're running Hoosier RS303 slicks, replace your U-joints, then goto Exotic Muscle and pick up heim-jointed camber rods, toe rods, and trailing links. These will not deflect- period! You should also do offest bushings up front for more neg camber. And at this point (if you're a decent driver) you will be leaving C-5's in the dust....