K&N FILTER
Thanks
:confused: :confused: :seeya





Mine does make a sucking sound with the cut lid.
At a porscheboard, some guy did a comparasion between stock airfilter in his TT (?) and the K&N airfilter... Take a look at the results!
quote:
Having a rainy saturday to contend with, I did a little test using an Kurtz Digital airflow meter. I compared a new stock filter to a K&N air filter.
I tried doing it "in-situ" but too many variables, so I set up a 3x3 duct and a constant air source.
Results: In measured air flow velocity Stock:18200 +/- 50 SFPM
K&N : 17600 +/-50P SFPM
That's standard feet per minute.
Converting that to volume, which is more important to us then velocity:
Stock 1138 SCFM
K&N 1100 SCFM Standard cubic feet per minute.
3 separate runs, same somewhat surprising results, I was theorizing that the narrow folds in the stock filter increase velocity, and like a set of headers, pulls or evacuates the area behind it. Just a thought, and if true, pretty brainy by the Porsche guys
Here's the thread: http://www.funcarsonline.com/ubbthr...lapsed&sb=5&o=7
A reply to this post reads:
the k&n's are overrated, yes. a clean fram air filter usually flows better than its k&n counterpart. that is a dyno-proven fact.
the only thing the k&n has going for it is reusability. but if you oil it too much it will flow even less. stick to a good cheap air filter and replace it regularly. there are other more important factors in the engine that limit longevity anyhow
the k&n is yet another urban myth...
Just another opinion...YOU decide!
:cheers: -Bill
The Best of Corvette for Corvette Enthusiasts








