When you click on links to various merchants on this site and make a purchase, this can result in this site earning a commission. Affiliate programs and affiliations include, but are not limited to, the eBay Partner Network.
I was reading (and admiring) the post on the proline heads... and I wanted to compare them to my trickflow 23* CNC'd heads. I know the prolines were mildly polished? and the TFs are out-of-the box... but what makes a cyl head "better?"
Trickflow versus proline:
.100 not listed
.200 138.5/105.2 versus 137/117 difference: +1.5/-11.8
.300 197.7/145.5 versus 187/153 difference: +10.7/-8.0
.400 237.1/170.7 versus 228/187 difference: +9.1/-16.3
.500 256.8/186.3 versus 260/202 difference: -3.2/-15.7
"difference" meaning, how do the trickflows compare to the prolines:
the worked-over prolines have a distinct advantage on the exhaust side (the port work?) and start to shine up high, but if anything the trickflows have a mild advantage on the intake... Since I think the prolines are a better head, what "makes" them better?
How does the Intake/Exhaust comparisons relate to torque (since the TFs are more lopsided, should they not have a higher exhaust velocity and more toque, or is it just wasted power)? For my setup, I won't see above .5" lift in a 383ci. I don't know to what use the prolines will be put to.
Am I missing something....I thought you made the switch from the crossfire to an LT1.....So how come after installing everything....you've still got head question's....are the heads aluminum???????
Sorry....just wanted to know.....as I also have an '84 vette....and quite interested in what you have accomplished....up to now????? Witch block are you using??????
Thanks.....(no FLAMEING)....
tony
and you know who I am.....
:cheers:
After all you have done so much work on your '84......
You ARE missing something: my sig! :jester I did the tuned port conversion and yes I already have the trickflows on (since December). Frankly I'm very happy with them and all the work I've accomplished (the car runs great!)- but I still have a lot to learn. This post just happens to be one of those "in retrospect..." curiosities.
I picked the trickflows because of their competitive #s and the $1200 assembled and to my door pricetag (that and I wanted to be a little different- I was shopping while the forum was bogged down with AFR related threads). Now I just want to see if I made a good decision or not. :D
And once I pass my competencies in August... I'll see about making a DIY conversion page for the crossfire guys out there.
IF I were to get a set of heads other than what I am already getting (Set of ZZ4 d-ports, that I'll have a stage 2 porting done on) I would get the Trickflows aswell.. Heard nuttin but good things about them..Same as the AFR's just they are cheaper..
Do you have knocking issue with your trickflow heads? I have trickflow on my 88 and have knocks at near WOT (between 2500 to 3000 rpm). I am using 91 Octane gas and like to know how to fix this issue with the least amount of work and money :rolleyes:
Do you have knocking issue with your trickflow heads? I have trickflow on my 88 and have knocks at near WOT (between 2500 to 3000 rpm). I am using 91 Octane gas and like to know how to fix this issue with the least amount of work and money :rolleyes:
I sure don't, but transmission worries have kept me from WOT... :rolleyes:
My guess would be to treat it like knock in any other situation... spark advance, fuel delivery, etc... though I noticed (with my cam) the car likes a little more timing. I kept it at 6 - 7 degrees, but probably could have gotten away with 8 degrees advanced.
from what i have heard, trick flows are of the fast burn design . they tend to like less timing to make max power. i have seen dyno charts with them making max power at 28* total advance. i would test them to be sure but i believe you will find no more than 34* total will be in order.
I sure don't, but transmission worries have kept me from WOT... :rolleyes:
My guess would be to treat it like knock in any other situation... spark advance, fuel delivery, etc... though I noticed (with my cam) the car likes a little more timing. I kept it at 6 - 7 degrees, but probably could have gotten away with 8 degrees advanced.
I am worry about my transmission too, and didn't even push the car until I was near Las Vegas driving from Philadelphia (new job). That's when I start to see/hear the knocking of hte engine when I tried to push the car a little harder :eek: . I have tried to reduced the timing to 4 degrees and it still knock. Haven't try advance it yet, but I think it would make it worse.
Ramanstud
things to keep in mind
(1)the exhaust flow numbers are not quite "AS CRITICAL" simply because the EXHAUST is phyisically forced out the exhaust port by a piston forcing the gases out of the cylinder as opposed to the intake which relies on outside air pressure and ram tuning.
(2) the TRICKFLOWS already out flow the pro-lines in the critical .300-.500 lift range and with further port work would further open the spread in flow numbers
(3)you already own the TRICKFLOWS, theres no real advantage to spending more money, especially for a 3%-7% increase in flow only above .500 lift
IM useing the TW trickflows ( YES IM AWARE,ITS NOT THE SAME HEAD) (yes mine are ported and flow better)
HERES WHAT CHEVY HIGH PERFORMANCE SAID
In an attempt to be different for the better, this TSF twisted Wedge head changed the valve angles from 23 degrees to 13 degrees. The really big difference here is what the exhaust side of this head is capable of. Only one other head (AFR 210) was even close on the exhaust side. The E/I was also a very respectable 77%. This head really can wake up your engine.
(3)you already own the TRICKFLOWS, theres no real advantage to spending more money, especially for a 3%-7% increase in flow only above .500 lift
:yesnod: I know. Not even THINKING about pulling the heads off! :D Just asking questions. I was very happy when I got the heads, and now I'm confident to boot. I bought them for the very reason that they DO flow so well in the .300" - .500" range... heck, I don't even look at flow #'s above .5" simply because I would never see that much lift.