When you click on links to various merchants on this site and make a purchase, this can result in this site earning a commission. Affiliate programs and affiliations include, but are not limited to, the eBay Partner Network.
What RPM does the the LT1 start making good HP. What Tc should i get . I aready have a 3.73 rear. I want to keep the car pretty streetable. And i want good ETs at the track. Thanks for youre input :chevy
Well that's a complicated question. The LT1 makes a very flat torque curve. Because of this as the RPM's go up the HP continues to go up as well. It also makes that torque very low as well.
This is the dyno graph of my stock LT1
As you can see it makes 300 pounds of torque at 2100 RPM's and holds that until about 4200 before it starts to fall.
Are those numbers at the rear wheels? I'm not that familiar with reading Dyno charts. I ask because it's less than the ratings from the factory- aren't we supposed to be seeing ~340ft/lbs of torque?
Are those numbers at the rear wheels? I'm not that familiar with reading Dyno charts. I ask because it's less than the ratings from the factory- aren't we supposed to be seeing ~340ft/lbs of torque?
Jared :flag
Dynojet numbers are at the rear wheels. So you add roughly 15% for manuals, and about 17-18% for automatics to get the factory crank HP rating.
Dynojet numbers are at the rear wheels. So you add roughly 15% for manuals, and about 17-18% for automatics to get the factory crank HP rating.
This should probably be a whole other topic, but when did GM (and the others) go back to GROSS horsepower with their ratings? I thought anything rated after (and maybe including???) 1972 was NET Horsepower (rear wheel).
Was it just to get the numbers up from the horrible ratings posted in the 70's (ie, I believe the 305 Camaro pumped-out an "amazing" 140 HP...at least it was NET - I hope!)
All car makers still refer to flywheel numbers. The NET horsepower doesn't take into account drivetrain loss. It does however mean that the engine must be run with all accessories attached and emissions equipment, etc in a controlled environment.
In the old days there were no standards and they would skew the results badly by dumping very cold air into the engine, using a very free flowing exhaust, and not even having any of the accessories connected (possibly not even the water pump!)
This should probably be a whole other topic, but when did GM (and the others) go back to GROSS horsepower with their ratings? I thought anything rated after (and maybe including???) 1972 was NET Horsepower (rear wheel).
Was it just to get the numbers up from the horrible ratings posted in the 70's (ie, I believe the 305 Camaro pumped-out an "amazing" 140 HP...at least it was NET - I hope!)
:cheers:
Dr.
No that was at the crank, GM quotes all its numbers since 72 as crank NET numbers. It does not take into account the drivetrain loss, which was greater back then than it is now.
Net is the HP rating at the crank, with all accessories, as it would be in the car
Gross is the engine at the crank, with no accessories