Hey Jesse,
Have you received my e-mails or instant message?

 

I believe Jesse is pretty busy at the moment. I also e-mailed and am waiting for a reply. He was fixing the rear diff. to get ready for raceday.

 

i also emailed him

 

Might as well jump on the bandwagon......I've sent IMs and emails for weeks now. I'm sure Jess will reply when he gets some time

 

The guy must be busy as I have sent two emails and he has not responded to me either!

 

What email are you using. I recall his post about problems with yahoo and he changed his email.

Don't trust the IM system.

 

used email address: sales@azzatochips.com



[Modified by bradvette, 8:27 AM 7/7/2004]

 

Does look correct!!!!

 

Thanks for the new e-mail address. I did hear from him this morning from one of my instant messages I have sent. I resent the e-mail about my chip to his new address.

 

Guys I am not sure what the heck is happening with my email. I went to my website host thinking that would be better, but now I can't even get onto that site :mad

Rest assured I am NOT ignoring anyone. I have got some emails, like JB666's for my weatherstripping which I have emailed him the same message countless times, and I don't think they are going through.

This really has me frustrated.....I am back on yahoo currently....but things like JB666 don't seem to be going through. This is not good.

Rich, I replied back to your message about 1 week ago, and I thought another also.....Your not getting any either

I think I am moving back to the lick it, mail it and wait scenerio.

Again I sincerely appologize for the problems. I am busy with my car, but would not ignore anyone's emails.

Please try to bear with me till this gets sorted out.

I am with this email now. ski_dwn_it@yahoo.com

Modern technology.....gotta love it

Oh yeah and these IMs are about worthless. They are a PITA to send if you did not recieve one, and they seldom if ever come through. Please resend if you sent one, but use the yahoo email.

 

Hey Jesse, not sure what the problem is with your e-mail. I have sent it on the 1,2, 7,8 so since it is not going through I have copied it and will paste it here. I dont have a ph. no. or fax no. to sent it to. so here goes my orig. post from 7-1-04

Hello Jesse,

Last night I went to the local 1/8 mile track and was
disappointed with the results. First, the rev limiter
is still set somewhere around 5800 instead of 6500.
Again, I made 3 back to back runs, with your chip the
runs were as follows. 8.092 at 87.08 mph, 7.913 at
87.83 mph, 8.006 at 87.48 mph.
The fastchip generic chip was as follows. 7.831 at
87.89 mph, 7.843 at 87.70 mph, and 7.876 at 87.69
mph.
All runs were made in drive letting the car shift on
its own. (factory govenor and shifting around
5600-5700)
I then tried to use the chip that you made for me, for
emissions. The car wont start with it. I pulled it out
and turned it around to see if I had it on backwards.
Still no start.
Should I return these to you to look at again?

Thanks
Richard

 

Don't want to butt in, but if you had that chip in backwards ever and turned the key, it is more than likely toast :mad

 

I'm waiting for his reply also..........

 

Well the chip setup that Jesse sold me was a piggy back adapter, which I believe is from moates, and then the chip plugs into it. There are no markings on it to indicate which way to plug it in nor was there any instructions that came with it.

 

The little white arrow on the chip points to the thin side of ECM case opening if it is in correct.

 

I dont want to get off base on this. The problem with the emissions chip not starting is only part of my problem. The performance chip that was made for me actually makes less power then the generic ed wright fastchip. This is proven on the dyno as well as at the track. The thing runs so rich that it is putting out black smoke. The wide band readings are in the 10's. The dyno operator advised against running the chip saying I will damage the motor in time. Dispite all of this, I posted the dyno results and wide band readings about 2 months ago. Jesse sill believed that this chip made better power in the lower rpms and was better overall. He said that the track would prove it. Well I ran 3 back to back runs with his chip and 3 back to back runs with the generic chip. The generic chip was faster even letting it shift on its own at 5600-5700 rpms. Also his chip has the rev limiter set at the factory setting. I sent him the dyno results, wide band readings, and track results, (before the ones that are posted above) I ask to review the info and raise the rev limiter to 6500. I have a msd 6al to control revs. Well after a little over 3 weeks I received the chip back and the rev limiter is still set at factory setting. I still went to a test and tune, again and made 3 back to back runs with each chip and his chip is slower. Well as you have already read in this post, I have made numerous attempts to contact him about this. I paid about $300.00 for this chip set up, I have $75.00 in the dyno runs, 2 test and tunes, and a lot of time. The only response I have had was a instant message saying what was up. I told him I would e-mail again, with the response in this thread. I dont like going public like this but I really dont see where I have any other choice. I have no ph. no. or fax no. And he cant seem to receive e-mails at either address. I also have noticed that he is still posting so it is not that he isnt at his computer. I dont want any hard feelings over this chip but it is useless to me and I feel I am being ignored by him. If he dosnt have the ability to program the chip correctly then just say so and then we could at least talk about a refund and move on.

 

I too am still waiting for a response. Hate the thoughts that he might be ignoring me. I am going to wait a bit and then I will start making a pest of myself. I know he is busy with the racing stuff. I have been down that road myself. Jesse, send an e-mail when you get time. Thanks, Pete TTT

 

93ragtop.

I did not realize this thread still was going after my last replies back that I was having email problems. I have several email in my yahoo account which I intended to review this morning and go over. In addition I thought you were sending back your chips per our last conversation, when you said the emissions one did not work.

As for the track results/dyno results....after you mailed the chips back the last time, I leaned out the chips. I do not want to go crazy and lean them out to too much. On the graphs you gave me from your dyno, which I have here infront of me, the AFR from ~4000-6200 was mid 12s moving slightly towards 13, which is exactly what you want. The <4000rpm is richer as you said, but you picked up a rediculous amount of power from 2300rpm-3400RPM. In the rehlm of 50 usable hp....that is right there on the dyno graphs which I pointed out in your last post regarding the two chips.

With your track results, you did not include the 60' times which I assure you are deceased from 1.7s to 1.82 & 3s because your spinning. Yet your still turning nearly the same ETs.

I did not really want to lean the lower end out, but did on your requst, all I can do is advise people on what I think is best, which is why your times most likely did not come back, on the second time around.

The dyno graphs clearly show a HUGE improvement in the area described above, and if your spinning off the line, then your times are going to suffer. You just need better tires to put the overall package together.

I would be happy to help you further and pick up all the shipping costs for you to resolve this until your happy with what you have received.

Again I thought you were sending the chips back, so I appologize for the misunderstanding.....I hope this clears the air a little. If you did not send back the chips yet be sure to include the rest of your time slips on with it.

I just ran some very interesting interval calculations comparing the two chips that further backs the 60' spinning scenerio. Comparing the slips I have here breaking the times out in intervals the two chips compared within .00X on every run, which stands to reason since the two compared very closely on the dyno runs, except at the begining of your runs from 3400 and less where mine made TONS more power. If you can harness that power on the launches you will turn a MUCH MUCH better ET than the other chip.

I have been doing this and racing for quite a while. The difference between a 1.73 60' time and a 1.837 60' time is HUGE. To the tune of about .2sec at the end of the track and then some since your turning nearly the same ETs at the end so its gaining throughout a little also.

Well I look forward to hearing from you. If you send more messages via email, back them up with a IM message letting me know you sent one. OK.

Thanks and talk to you soon. PS: Let me know what the shipping was for the past shippment and I will pick that up as well. Don't want anyone going unhappy.

 

I have one of Jesse's chips also. He has always replied to my emails. Except for the last 2 weeks. Then I found out he was having email problems and switched to his yahoo account. After sending 3 different emails to his yahoo account he replied to all of them within a few hours. I thought for 2 weeks he was ignoreing me but it was just email problems. I'm sure you can work out your problems. Jesse is a stand up guy and will do what it takes to make it right.

 

Jesse, I have 11.50 x 26 x17 ET Streets on the car and when I heat them (very little) it dead hooks with both chips. This is the way I tested both chips so I could do as accurate of a comparson as possible. So I can assure you that the car is not spinning. It just dosnt have as much low end power with your chip. My 60ft. and 330ft times are as follows.
With your chip they are 1.817 and 5.264, 1.796 and 5.115, 1.88 and 5.200. with the generic chip 1.731 and 5.037, 1.730 and 5.043, 1.762 and 5.075.
After reviewing these runs (on video) I did get a little spin on the 1.88 run with your chip. On that run, when I tried to do my burnout only one tire was wet and I let off so it didnt get them hot.
I have a auto xray and if there are any readings I can take that will help you please tell me what they are and I will do it.
I dont want any hard feelings over this, I have become flustered when e-mailing several times , sending IM and it seemed that since I was complaining I was being ignored. I hope I was wrong. I will try to transfer the video over to a DVD and I will send it to you in the next few days along with the time slips and chips. If there are any readings with the auto xray that I can take let me know and I will send them as well.
Oh, by the way, the best run my wife made at Cecil Co. (different track) was a 11.97 at 115.81 mph. She drove around the water, tried to do a short hop to clean the tires, and pulled up to the line and ran. The ET Streets hooked to the tune of a 1.75 60ft time. Hookedup was behind her in the lanes and commented to us that the track will be getting on her for running in the 11's and no roll bar. Which of course they did give her a warning.
The point I am trying to make, (other then being proud of her for the run) is the Tires hook well and wheel spin is not my problem. This run was done on the generic chip.
One other thing I will add (and I apoligize for rambleing so much) is if you think it would help, I can get the car dynoed again to assure the dyno readings were done correctly.
Just advise me as to sending them back now or if you need further info on my part, ie. auto xray readings, dyno pulls, etc. I do want to get this thing right.