When you click on links to various merchants on this site and make a purchase, this can result in this site earning a commission. Affiliate programs and affiliations include, but are not limited to, the eBay Partner Network.
I was wondering what kind of quarter mile et and mph gains I would see if I put Long tube headers, removed my cats, and put an x pipe in place of the resonator? It is a basically stock LT1 and I have the mufflers removed and a Hypertech Programmer.
You will see a greater 1/4 mile improvement with 1 5/8ths" tube headers, over the larger tubed headers. Especially if you can get the tires to hook up. The smaller tubes will give you more low and mid range grunt, with no sacrifice at the top end.
I was wondering what kind of quarter mile et and mph gains I would see if I put Long tube headers, removed my cats, and put an x pipe in place of the resonator? It is a basically stock LT1 and I have the mufflers removed and a Hypertech Programmer.
I believe that Nathan has header results on his web page. (dyno anyways) I believe his was done after running a flowmaster system and the hotcam. He then installed the long tube headers. I do believe with no cats, x pipe and no mufflers that thing will be LOUD.
From: Good health is merely the slowest possible rate at which one can die
St. Jude Donor '04-'05-'06-'07
Originally Posted by CFI-EFI
You will see a greater 1/4 mile improvement with 1 5/8ths" tube headers, over the larger tubed headers. Especially if you can get the tires to hook up. The smaller tubes will give you more low and mid range grunt, with no sacrifice at the top end.
RACE ON!!!
Definitely the way to go with all but heavily modified engines. Stainless Works makes a nice one and in the Hedman Elite series, not to be confused with their cheaper headers, makes a nice coated one (outside only) w/ 3/8" flanges and heavier pipe for a little over $300 from Summit. Bad news, there's about a two month wait right now.
My buddy Vince Ivanc gained, I think 15 or 16 RWHP with longtubes on his modded 92lt1.
+15 rwhp / +16 rwtq going from Hooker shorty headers and stock cats to EM long tubes and !cats , with the mods in my sig. Should be +1.5 mph and -.15 e.t. using the normal "10hp/0.1sec/1mph" rule of thumb.
May be different for a completely stock motor, not sure...
From: What did the 5 fingers say to the face? SLAP!!
Originally Posted by CFI-EFI
You will see a greater 1/4 mile improvement with 1 5/8ths" tube headers, over the larger tubed headers. Especially if you can get the tires to hook up. The smaller tubes will give you more low and mid range grunt, with no sacrifice at the top end.
RACE ON!!!
I disagree. No matter what combination you plug into Desktop Dyno, the larger headers always show a gain at every rpm level.
From: I'm the walkin dude I can see all of the world...
St. Jude Donor '03
Originally Posted by flyersfan1088
I disagree. No matter what combination you plug into Desktop Dyno, the larger headers always show a gain at every rpm level.
No, CFI-EFI is right about the 1 5/8ths. They are definitly the optimum Header for these cars. Problem is they are tough to find in affordable quality. That being said there is still an excellent gain coming from the 1 3/4 LT's. It has to do with producing more torque.
No, CFI-EFI is right about the 1 5/8ths. They are definitly the optimum Header for these cars. Problem is they are tough to find in affordable quality. That being said there is still an excellent gain coming from the 1 3/4 LT's. It has to do with producing more torque.
Very interesting thing that. A good friend of mine did back to back dyno runs on a heads / cam LS1 car, he went from 1 3/4" headers to 1 7/8" headers and picked up power clear across the board with no loss in low end. Just some more fuel for the fire.
Wasn't there a post a while back regarding this header size question? As I recall, it was from a magazine. They tested 1 5/8" , 1 3/4" and 1 7/8", and, I think, showed no major differences.
From: I'm the walkin dude I can see all of the world...
St. Jude Donor '03
Originally Posted by Nathan Plemons
Very interesting thing that. A good friend of mine did back to back dyno runs on a heads / cam LS1 car, he went from 1 3/4" headers to 1 7/8" headers and picked up power clear across the board with no loss in low end. Just some more fuel for the fire.
Well I am perfectly happy with the gains of my 1 3/4 LT's! This stuff just comes up everytime headers come up. I try to keep it simple for the person posting it. I figure if you can afford it get the 1 5/8ths but if you are like the rest of us you should have no problems getting the TPIS or the Hookers because they are an excellent choice.
I disagree. No matter what combination you plug into Desktop Dyno, the larger headers always show a gain at every rpm level.
I will concede that your computer is faster than my computer. On the track, I'll bet big bucks. I have been a party to and been involved in, too many "experiments" to to trust DD2000 or any other program on THAT one. *I* have made close-up and personal observations.
Originally Posted by FoolCrzy
Wasn't there a post a while back regarding this header size question? As I recall, it was from a magazine. They tested 1 5/8" , 1 3/4" and 1 7/8", and, I think, showed no major differences.
That is correct, for horsepower figures. The 1 5/8ths" headers, give up NOTHING, on the top end in a 350 (346?) engine. A wild enough 383 may benefit from 1 3/4" headers. Corky and Ski-dwn-it were running 1 5/8ths" on their 406's. Even their 434's, in the beginning. I believe.