When you click on links to various merchants on this site and make a purchase, this can result in this site earning a commission. Affiliate programs and affiliations include, but are not limited to, the eBay Partner Network.
10.55:1 is quite mellow on an LT1, mostly becauset of the short intake runner lengths. For a TPI motor this is on the high side of streetable. Need to log the car to see if the car is pulling timing to see if it's going to need even higher octane.
if you have a large cam that can bleed off cylinder pressure then you can run 91octane with alum heads. its possible to do it with even 12.1 with the right components.you should be ok still sonsidering the LT-4 has more than that stock.
I wouldn't play with this issue, it's too important. We all want to push the envelope a bit without leaving HP on the table when we plan our build. It's really all about the dynamic CR, not the static, try this link for a great worksheet, the download is near the bottom. This will even let you see the effects of advancing or retarding your cam for bleedoff
What you calc'd was the static comp ratio. What really matter's as ping is concerned is the dynamic ratio, and overall design. Quench is the distance from the top of the piston to the top of the flats' of the cyl head. This distance has a lot to do w/ elim cyl hot spots. The other issue is the valve timing. This is what will give you the dynamic comp ratio. (See the above post about cam's.) 10.5 is no big deal on an LT1,... reverse cooling, alu heads,.....
I was reading on the web tonight and they said 91 octane was good only to 10.1
Is this true?
Whomever wrote that should have his crayons (surely they don't let him play with sharp instruments!) taken away from him. And then you perpetuate the problem by asking:
Originally Posted by USAsOnlyWay
List em off:
87 Octane:
89 Octane:
91: Octane:
For the blanks to be filled in. There are many variables that determine the octane requirements of any given engine. A good many are posted buy the good responses above. All except:
Originally Posted by Juddidiah!
10.55:1 is quite mellow on an LT1, mostly becauset of the short intake runner lengths. For a TPI motor this is on the high side of streetable.
10.55:1 is quite mellow on an LT1, mostly becauset of the short intake runner lengths. For a TPI motor this is on the high side of streetable.
Who doesn't have a clue.
If runner length has any affect on detonation it is minimal. The LT1 does have a superior compression tolerance but it comes from the reverse flow cooling setup, not the intake.
I've seen street driven LT1's with 12.5:1 compression run just fine on pump gas.
Don't be fooled by absolute octane numbers either. Here in BG I can easily go to almost any gas station and get 93 octane. Drive to Denver and you won't find 93, it might as well be race gas. The reason is that atmospheric pressure plays a big part in cylinder pressure. At high altitudes you can run a much lower octane fuel than you can at sea level and get away with it.
The short and simple answer to your question is that there is no short and simple answer to your question. It depends on your cylinder head design, pistons, camshaft AND geographic location. Blanket statements that XX octane is only good for xx.xx compression are completely useless.
part of the reason that the lt1 has reverse flow cooling, through the heads first, is so they can run a slightly higher compression ratio than conventional flow cooling.
if you have a large cam that can bleed off cylinder pressure then you can run 91octane with alum heads. its possible to do it with even 12.1 with the right components.you should be ok still sonsidering the LT-4 has more than that stock.
You can run more compression with a larger cam. The compression game is a fine line...cross the line and you're cursed with adding octane boost at every fill up.