When you click on links to various merchants on this site and make a purchase, this can result in this site earning a commission. Affiliate programs and affiliations include, but are not limited to, the eBay Partner Network.
My best time has been a 11.96 and fastest was 115.81 mph. (not in the same run). I hope to get better when I get the tuning issue straightened out. I have ported heads, headers, hotcam, electric water pump. EM headers without cats going into the stock exhaust, 4.09 gears, 3000 stall converter, and ET Streets 27x11x17. Still running the orig, injectors, 48mm tb, and as said above stock exhaust.
I dynoed at 355 hp at the rear wheels with a ed wright generic chip.
Best with the cam in a stock LT4 bottom end motor with ported heads/intake, 52mmtb, Longtubes, corsa cat back, 4:10 gears and drag radials, was 11:82@118 in ideal weather/track conditions.
do you guys think that lt1's got faster as the years went on. say if I had a 1996 vs a 92 or 93?
what type of porting or heads are yall running I just bought my hot cam kit...325 shipped new .
and I have stock lt1 heads.
I also might be getting dana 44 and 3.73s. but I am worknig on a cheap deal.
so with stock rear end and stock heads.
what are my 1/4 times most likely going to be?
my goal is mid to low 12s after dana 44
thanks your friend
Sean
There were a few cam changes in the LT1 throughout the years which made a little bit more torque, I believe in 94. They also switched to the PCM which had sequential fuel injection instead of batch fire. Rumor has it that the compression ratio changed slightly as well, up to 10.5:1 from 10.2:1 of the first engines. For all practical purposes though they're the same. Many many dyno charts have proven that the LT1 no matter what the year is very consistent with it's power output. Any of the year differences go out the window as soon as you replace the cam and heads, then they're all on the exact same playing field as far as power goes.
The 92 was absolutely the heaviest LT1 Vette, they got slightly lighter throughout the years. Any difference in performance can be attributed to that more than the engine, even then it's almost negligable unless you're a perfect driver.
As for power with any given stage of modification, check out the link to my website above. For an auto trans subtract about 20 hp off of each peak.
There were a few cam changes in the LT1 throughout the years which made a little bit more torque, I believe in 94. They also switched to the PCM which had sequential fuel injection instead of batch fire. Rumor has it that the compression ratio changed slightly as well, up to 10.5:1 from 10.2:1 of the first engines. For all practical purposes though they're the same. Many many dyno charts have proven that the LT1 no matter what the year is very consistent with it's power output. Any of the year differences go out the window as soon as you replace the cam and heads, then they're all on the exact same playing field as far as power goes.
The 92 was absolutely the heaviest LT1 Vette, they got slightly lighter throughout the years. Any difference in performance can be attributed to that more than the engine, even then it's almost negligable unless you're a perfect driver.
As for power with any given stage of modification, check out the link to my website above. For an auto trans subtract about 20 hp off of each peak.
now I've got to drop some weight off my 92! hmm time for that air pump to go! Spare tire yep! Lets see what else can be taken off this bad boy ...
what i did to drop weight.... air/egr, headers, muffler elims, spare tire removal, ac removal.
i dropped well over 100 lbs! also the spare tire jack...if you are counting ounces.
what i did to drop weight.... air/egr, headers, muffler elims, spare tire removal, ac removal.
i dropped well over 100 lbs! also the spare tire jack...if you are counting ounces.
I'll draw the line at taking off my AC ! It gets warm in Illinois doesn't it get warm in Georgia? I'll just get an airfoil and that will give me the 50 horsepower I'll lose by keeping my AC!
yes well I have that 2x60 AC. (2 windows down at 60 mph)
also this is not a daily driver!
I'm building a speed demon... I mean itll prob take off .1 but that .1 matters to me on the street!
plus it made my under drive pulley install more worth while.
alot less accessory drag, cant wait until i get the electirc water pump!
That's a little bit of a loaded question. Define similar. The Hot Cam can easily make more power than a similar cam, it can easily make less.
Every camshaft spec is going to change the power output of the engine somewhat. If you can post the specs of the "similar" cam we'll be happy to try and guess at how it'll do.
Well, I dont have anything specific in mind, but id have to guess something with the same intake profile and a bit more duration and lift on the exhaust side ...
Well the hot cam tends to favor the exhaust pretty heavily on the duration side as it is. It sounds to me like you're wanting to put a pretty healthy shot of nitrous on this motor as well....
That's slightly smaller than the hot cam from all angles. It'll idle a hair smoother but it'll make less power. As for what is "better" that's entirely your call. With the looser than stock stall converter you can get by with a little bit more aggressive cam and still have good street manners. Unfortunately there is no way to quantify idle quality or driveability and there are too many variables to say exactly how much more power the hot cam will make.
I know it's not what you're looking for, but there is no easy answer.
Unfortunately there is no way to quantify idle quality or driveability and there are too many variables to say exactly how much more power the hot cam will make.
.
The Hot Cam idles noticeably better if you bump the idle speed from 850 to 950. John Sealock says at 850 there just isn't enough vacuum for all the sensors to work right. People used to comment about hearing the cam in mine, now it's not so obvious. I still am not going to volunteer my car for parades.
My setup is weaker from idle to about 1800 than with the standard cam. I can't launch at just off idle like MOJO does because the engine falls on its face. If you race you definitely would want a looser stall TC than stock.
Designer Imagines A Corvette That Looks More Like a Corvette Than the Corvette
Slideshow: A Jaguar designer's personal project imagines what a modern front-engined Corvette might look like if Chevrolet revisited the golden age of the Stingray.