How does it compare?
#1
How does it compare?
I have a big sweet spot for this particular run of ZR1's. To the guys that have the privilege of owning one, how does it compare to Vettes of years to come and other cars in its time period? I'm having a difficult time finding info.
#3
Le Mans Master
The ZR-1 Cognoscenti understand what a special Corvette this car really was. And it continues to be underappreciated by most but admired by those that are familiar wih it. I find younger kids to know about it and when they see it, its as if they have gotten a view of a unicorn. To them the car is a legend rarely seen. The stock motor is still brilliant. However, even in the last 20 years, enthusisats have continued to push the technology and the motor takes on those modifications rather comfortably always increasing power. All the while being able to idle at somewhere around 8-900 rpm with 20 year old engine control management and ignition. Nothing like the turbine like sound of the LT-5 at WOT full song. Nothing like the flat hp curve at the top end either.
Last edited by Dominic Sorresso; 02-21-2011 at 10:22 AM.
#4
Le Mans Master
You really need to drive one in good running condition, to appreciate it. I think it's like the song "Still rock & roll to me", with the lyrics "you can't get the sound from a story in a magazine" - and it's true in the case of the LT5, and the whole ZR-1 package. I've also had a C5, and a base C4, and I'm on my second ZR-1, and there is no comparison in the fun factor, in my opinion. Until I drove one, however, I was pretty content with my other vettes.
#5
Safety Car
my 2008 coupe w/ the z51 gearing will run rings around my '91 ZR-1.
-it's still faster than an LT1 powered C4
-30 to 40 hp in mods would make it just about right (the way it should have been).
-I'm not sure what early Vipers run like, but this is one point that is never brought up regarding the slow sales of 92-95 ZR-1's.
-the powerband is smooth and it take a little away from the percieved acceleration-but when you look at the speedo, you know it still boogies.
no bmw's have challenged me yet-those cars can be problems.
-it's still faster than an LT1 powered C4
-30 to 40 hp in mods would make it just about right (the way it should have been).
-I'm not sure what early Vipers run like, but this is one point that is never brought up regarding the slow sales of 92-95 ZR-1's.
-the powerband is smooth and it take a little away from the percieved acceleration-but when you look at the speedo, you know it still boogies.
no bmw's have challenged me yet-those cars can be problems.
#7
Race Director
The most addictive sound I have ever heard was the 90 I once had with the Power Effects exhaust capsules on it. The sound in 3rd and 4th gear as it reached redline use to give me goosebumps every time.
Imagine trying to stop yourself from doing that over and over?
These days on my 91 its long tubes with 3 inch exhaust and Flowmaster 40s out back. Its sounds great but doesn't give me the "buzz" like the 90 did.
This is just one aspect of owning one of these fine chariots from the past.
#8
Le Mans Master
Member Since: Oct 2004
Location: South-central Missouri
Posts: 6,314
Received 500 Likes
on
395 Posts
You really have to try one to know. It's like trying to describe sex to a virgin, I suppose.
The LT5 sounds and performs like no other Corvette prior or since. And, a fully ported LT5 with headers and free flowing exhaust will make over 500 hp with the stock cams - the way they should have come form the factory in the first place. With those mods it will still idle so smooth I can place a nickel on edge and balance it on the plenum of my idling (500+ hp) LT5. And, it has beautiful manners - will mosey around in city traffic like a stocker.
WOT is what separates these cars from the push-rod contemporaries. I remember whacking the throttle for the first time and being ready to shift when I felt the torque curve nose over. It never nosed over...I was hooked forever! It was turbine smooth and pulling all the way to 7k.
So much is made by car magazines, and sales hype about peak hp numbers this or that motor develops. Well, that's only relative if your describing the characteristics of motors of similar design. But, the 32 valve, DOHC design will introduce the concept of power or (more correctly) acceleration under the curve. The result is the LT5 cars will out accelerate similar pushrod designs having 25-30 more "peak" hp. (And, now putting as much to the rear wheels as a stock LS3 makes at the crank...we ain't a skeert of no C6s in a straight line, 'cept maybe da ZR1)
Well, here I am trying to "describe sex to a virgin" again. You'll just have to "bust a cherry" and drive one. Then you'll understand.
P.
The LT5 sounds and performs like no other Corvette prior or since. And, a fully ported LT5 with headers and free flowing exhaust will make over 500 hp with the stock cams - the way they should have come form the factory in the first place. With those mods it will still idle so smooth I can place a nickel on edge and balance it on the plenum of my idling (500+ hp) LT5. And, it has beautiful manners - will mosey around in city traffic like a stocker.
WOT is what separates these cars from the push-rod contemporaries. I remember whacking the throttle for the first time and being ready to shift when I felt the torque curve nose over. It never nosed over...I was hooked forever! It was turbine smooth and pulling all the way to 7k.
So much is made by car magazines, and sales hype about peak hp numbers this or that motor develops. Well, that's only relative if your describing the characteristics of motors of similar design. But, the 32 valve, DOHC design will introduce the concept of power or (more correctly) acceleration under the curve. The result is the LT5 cars will out accelerate similar pushrod designs having 25-30 more "peak" hp. (And, now putting as much to the rear wheels as a stock LS3 makes at the crank...we ain't a skeert of no C6s in a straight line, 'cept maybe da ZR1)
Well, here I am trying to "describe sex to a virgin" again. You'll just have to "bust a cherry" and drive one. Then you'll understand.
P.
#9
Western Chicago Burbs.
Thanks for the responses. I can tell you are very passionate about your rides. I would be too if I had a wonderful piece of Corvette history. My primary inquiry is of the C4 chassis. I haven't heard good things about it and it seems severely outdated compared to the later generations. There is an underlying issue of flex, which leads me to wonder how the car handles the stress from various loads. How is this addressed? Also, does anyone have the numbers for weight distribution and lateral acceleration from a stocker? Thanks in advance!
Thanks for the responses. I can tell you are very passionate about your rides. I would be too if I had a wonderful piece of Corvette history. My primary inquiry is of the C4 chassis. I haven't heard good things about it and it seems severely outdated compared to the later generations. There is an underlying issue of flex, which leads me to wonder how the car handles the stress from various loads. How is this addressed? Also, does anyone have the numbers for weight distribution and lateral acceleration from a stocker? Thanks in advance!
#10
Le Mans Master
Western Chicago Burbs.
Thanks for the responses. I can tell you are very passionate about your rides. I would be too if I had a wonderful piece of Corvette history. My primary inquiry is of the C4 chassis. I haven't heard good things about it and it seems severely outdated compared to the later generations. There is an underlying issue of flex, which leads me to wonder how the car handles the stress from various loads. How is this addressed? Also, does anyone have the numbers for weight distribution and lateral acceleration from a stocker? Thanks in advance!
Thanks for the responses. I can tell you are very passionate about your rides. I would be too if I had a wonderful piece of Corvette history. My primary inquiry is of the C4 chassis. I haven't heard good things about it and it seems severely outdated compared to the later generations. There is an underlying issue of flex, which leads me to wonder how the car handles the stress from various loads. How is this addressed? Also, does anyone have the numbers for weight distribution and lateral acceleration from a stocker? Thanks in advance!
#11
Team Owner
Member Since: Oct 2004
Location: altered state
Posts: 81,242
Received 3,043 Likes
on
2,602 Posts
St. Jude Donor '05
First impression I got after driving the Z I bought after having fooled with a TPI Vette is "thats the way they should have been from the start".
C4s were horribly underpowered the LT5 is a great platform to start with.
C4s were horribly underpowered the LT5 is a great platform to start with.
#12
NCM Lifetime # 982
blue.label take Dominic up on his offer.