When you click on links to various merchants on this site and make a purchase, this can result in this site earning a commission. Affiliate programs and affiliations include, but are not limited to, the eBay Partner Network.
My question goes out the those that have been running meth straight for 6k or more miles in there setups. Visited with one of my Viper buddies who is putting down a mere 960 rwhp and at 6k the rings were showing some wear. He was running good and had an oil leak so during the fix he decided to pull the pistons and that is when the builder found the issue and he was running straight meth like I have for 4k now. What do we see in the LSX setup? Will we see the same thing as my buddy in his viper does? He does rund a blower on his car like lots of us who are running the Meth?
My question goes out the those that have been running meth straight for 6k or more miles in there setups. Visited with one of my Viper buddies who is putting down a mere 960 rwhp and at 6k the rings were showing some wear. He was running good and had an oil leak so during the fix he decided to pull the pistons and that is when the builder found the issue and he was running straight meth like I have for 4k now. What do we see in the LSX setup? Will we see the same thing as my buddy in his viper does? He does rund a blower on his car like lots of us who are running the Meth?
I ran meth in my single turbo 346 for about 4K miles and I had absolutely no issues. In fact, the compression test came up as good as when the car was broken in.
flashpoint at 140 degree
Snow performance recommend at least 20% H2O mix from a safety standpoint.
I've been running 100% meth in my evo and ATI C5, no issue so far. I will go to the 80/20 mix as soon as the tuner can take me in for safety reason.
flashpoint at 140 degree
Snow performance recommend at least 20% H2O mix from a safety standpoint.
I've been running 100% meth in my evo and ATI C5, no issue so far. I will go to the 80/20 mix as soon as the tuner can take me in for safety reason.
Bob,
What safety reasons? I have seen people doing 80/20 or some derivative mixture and I see that as a bigger risk. Unless you tune the car on the fat side, you risk going lean if your mixture is off. Btw, I was probably the 2nd C5 on this board running meth. Been doing it for a good 18 or so months...and I have had no problems at all.
What safety reasons? I have seen people doing 80/20 or some derivative mixture and I see that as a bigger risk. Unless you tune the car on the fat side, you risk going lean if your mixture is off. Btw, I was probably the 2nd C5 on this board running meth. Been doing it for a good 18 or so months...and I have had no problems at all.
Bob, thanks for your response on this as I have my car running fat and bet there must have been an issue with the Viper's motor, looks like I will continue the straight running of the meth
What safety reasons? I have seen people doing 80/20 or some derivative mixture and I see that as a bigger risk. Unless you tune the car on the fat side, you risk going lean if your mixture is off. Btw, I was probably the 2nd C5 on this board running meth. Been doing it for a good 18 or so months...and I have had no problems at all.
Most of us use the windshield wiper reservoir for the meth, underhood temp as we all know can get well above 140, if there's a small leak enough for the vapor to escape you run into the possibility of fire and since meth burn without emitting much of a color most of the time you don't know it until it's too late.
This has nothing to do with AFR which I believe even if you're a bit off with your mix should not be affected by it. The % variance will be so small.
What safety reasons? I have seen people doing 80/20 or some derivative mixture and I see that as a bigger risk. Unless you tune the car on the fat side, you risk going lean if your mixture is off. Btw, I was probably the 2nd C5 on this board running meth. Been doing it for a good 18 or so months...and I have had no problems at all.
I'm not sure I agree with your reasoning, unless your going for max performance and not using alky/water as a safety device or insurance policy. I think if you are using meth as a supplemental fuel system, then your tune is 100% meth dependent...
But if you are using alky/water to reduce IAT and add some safety, then a normal tune is going to be required. Water in this case has more latent heat do to phase change, so it cools better then meth alone, although without safety of additional octane. A mix in this case would have advantages and any hick-up with system will hopefully not grenade motor.
My question goes out the those that have been running meth straight for 6k or more miles in there setups. Visited with one of my Viper buddies who is putting down a mere 960 rwhp and at 6k the rings were showing some wear. He was running good and had an oil leak so during the fix he decided to pull the pistons and that is when the builder found the issue and he was running straight meth like I have for 4k now. What do we see in the LSX setup? Will we see the same thing as my buddy in his viper does? He does rund a blower on his car like lots of us who are running the Meth?
I would guess that his issue was related to the original ring gaps... or the tune.
I'm not a big fan of spraying alky on top of an already rich tune. I think that will eventually cause problems and is the reason that I tune for the spray and keep my fingers crossed that the pump never fails….
flashpoint at 140 degree
Snow performance recommend at least 20% H2O mix from a safety standpoint.
I've been running 100% meth in my evo and ATI C5, no issue so far. I will go to the 80/20 mix as soon as the tuner can take me in for safety reason.
This is incorrect.... The flash point of methanol is 725 degrees F TLV/TWA (Threshold Limit Value/Time Weighted Average) 200 ppm .
Why are we discussing flashpoint anyway... Flashpoint is a scientific term for the temperature at which a substance will ignite when exposed to an open flame... If you have a fire under your hood there is more to worry about than meth.
Why are we discussing flashpoint anyway... Flashpoint is a scientific term for the temperature at which a substance will ignite when exposed to an open flame... If you have a fire under your hood there is more to worry about than meth.
I agree with you in principle.
Disclaimer: I am not a chemist... But FWIW the flash point is the lowest temperature at which it could burn, not the temperature it will ignite when exposed to open flame. According to MSDS the flash point of methanol is 50 degrees F...
To that end, I think the autoignition temperature is more interesting than the flash point. The autoignition temperature of methanol is around 850 degrees F. A hot turbo or other really hot exhaust components could reach that temperature...
Why are we discussing flashpoint anyway... Flashpoint is a scientific term for the temperature at which a substance will ignite when exposed to an open flame... If you have a fire under your hood there is more to worry about than meth.
flashpoint is important because in theory, the methanol vapors could ignite at that temperature which is quite low! In practice is another matter, but it still helps to understand what can happen if conditions are wrong.
flashpoint is important because in theory, the methanol vapors could ignite at that temperature which is quite low! In practice is another matter, but it still helps to understand what can happen if conditions are wrong.
I think you are getting worked up over nothing. I understand your point but keep in mind the flash point of gasoline of -40F to -50F. This means it COULD combust inside the gas tank, right? The gas tank itself can get to over 100 degrees F during operation (I have measured this myself). But how many spontaneously combusting gas tanks have you heard of?
IMHO the only physical danger of methanol in the engine bay is if the tank dislodges and somehow works its way down to the exhaust where a lot of it is ignited at once. Lots of guys have been running 100% methanol for a long time and I would bet you'd be hard pressed to find a catastrophic event tied to even just a moderate leak.
Now again, if the tank dislodged, or you had some other catastrophic event (rollover) then yes, the methanol could easily pose a danger.. but so would the gasoline in your tanks.
We seem to be getting off track for what I wanted to know and that is how are our engines holding up for those using straight meth, not the flash point, and I still would like to hear from more of the meth users that have lots of miles on there setup and how they are still performing
9,000 miles on my 2004 Vortech SC Z06 running straight meth during boost. Stock bottom end, 532 rwhp. 15,000 total miles on the vehicle. Installed the meth injection at 6,000 miles for added safety and peace of mind. No oil burning or any other issues.