C5 Forced Induction/Nitrous C5 Corvette Turbochargers, Superchargers, Centrifugal, Twin Screw & Roots Blowers, Twin Turbo Kits, Intercoolers, Wet & Dry Nitrous Injection, Meth
Sponsored by:
Sponsored by:

The dreaded #7 destruction...

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 05-10-2007, 09:32 PM
  #41  
madeouttaglass
Le Mans Master
 
madeouttaglass's Avatar
 
Member Since: Jan 2003
Location: AKA Harvey Mushman-I know just enough to be dangerous "Those who sacrifice liberty for safety deserve neither"- B. Franklin
Posts: 6,059
Received 12 Likes on 12 Posts
Senior Member
Cruise-In V Veteran

Default

Has anyone toasted a forged aftermarket #7 piston?
Old 05-11-2007, 09:29 AM
  #42  
stevieturbo
Melting Slicks
 
stevieturbo's Avatar
 
Member Since: Jul 2004
Location: Northern Ireland
Posts: 2,830
Received 140 Likes on 125 Posts

Default

Lean mixtures or detonation can kill any type of piston.
Old 05-11-2007, 09:39 AM
  #43  
madeouttaglass
Le Mans Master
 
madeouttaglass's Avatar
 
Member Since: Jan 2003
Location: AKA Harvey Mushman-I know just enough to be dangerous "Those who sacrifice liberty for safety deserve neither"- B. Franklin
Posts: 6,059
Received 12 Likes on 12 Posts
Senior Member
Cruise-In V Veteran

Default

That I understand. I'd like to know if someone has had the same problem with an aftermarket piston in the 5 or 7 cylinder. I changed mine out to forged Mahles. When I did I could see how easy it was for any of the stock pistons to let go. That hole in the top of the factory piston comes very close to the top ring land.
Old 05-11-2007, 08:00 PM
  #44  
leojnknsC5
Melting Slicks
 
leojnknsC5's Avatar
 
Member Since: Sep 2005
Location: eagle mountain utah
Posts: 3,082
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by LV Vette
I hope this is not a stupid idea, but if # 5 and #7 are the problem due to lean AFR, what would happen if you use a slightly larger injector on these two? It just popped into my head, so what do you think?


Thanks,

Clayton from Las Vegas
YOur computer will be constantly in a state of confusion from adjusting the air fuel ratio when 5 and 7 fire. The cylinder after 5 or 7 will end up too lean.
Old 05-11-2007, 08:02 PM
  #45  
leojnknsC5
Melting Slicks
 
leojnknsC5's Avatar
 
Member Since: Sep 2005
Location: eagle mountain utah
Posts: 3,082
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by RED99
I"m thinking a single plane carb style intake with a 90° elbow on top where the carb would go would work better for F/I. This would push the air down in the center of the motor and equally divide the air.
It could be the composite intake on teh LSx was designed for motors using vacuum to make power, not pressurized air.

Do the maggies have the same problem?

Last edited by leojnknsC5; 05-11-2007 at 08:07 PM.
Old 05-12-2007, 12:10 AM
  #46  
NassauBlue98
Pro
 
NassauBlue98's Avatar
 
Member Since: Jun 2003
Location: Moline IL
Posts: 555
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by APS
It's definitely a piston heat related issue as those cyliners run much hotter due to much leaner air fuel ratios. It's quite easy to see this when you actually measure the EGT and AFR on each individual cylinder.

Peter

Can you quantify this, Peter? For instance, how much spread do you see between the AFRs from cylinder to cylinder?
Old 05-12-2007, 06:48 AM
  #47  
Warp Factor
Le Mans Master
Support Corvetteforum!
 
Warp Factor's Avatar
 
Member Since: Oct 2005
Location: Metro Detroit Michigan
Posts: 7,078
Received 1,817 Likes on 1,085 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by leojnknsC5
YOur computer will be constantly in a state of confusion from adjusting the air fuel ratio when 5 and 7 fire. The cylinder after 5 or 7 will end up too lean.
I'd think the opposite would be true if 5 and 7 are leaner to begin with (as Peter stated) and injectors are selected to help even this out.
Old 05-12-2007, 09:51 AM
  #48  
Bill Reid
Le Mans Master
Thread Starter
 
Bill Reid's Avatar
 
Member Since: Nov 2000
Location: Chandler AZ
Posts: 7,391
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
Default

What about a different heat range plug in #5 and #7?
Old 05-12-2007, 10:41 AM
  #49  
NemesisC5
Le Mans Master
Support Corvetteforum!
 
NemesisC5's Avatar
 
Member Since: Dec 2005
Location: Port Arthur, Texas 77642
Posts: 8,475
Received 331 Likes on 241 Posts

Default

Old 05-12-2007, 11:15 AM
  #50  
leojnknsC5
Melting Slicks
 
leojnknsC5's Avatar
 
Member Since: Sep 2005
Location: eagle mountain utah
Posts: 3,082
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Warp Factor
I'd think the opposite would be true if 5 and 7 are leaner to begin with (as Peter stated) and injectors are selected to help even this out.
The problem in 5 and 7 is the ratio changes. When they get too lean, they blow. But they work most of the time so its not a problem of them being too lean, but that they fluctuate.

Anybody who's blown 5 or 7 would be wise to pull the composite intake manifold and replace it with one that centers the incoming air to the center of the manifold, like a carbed manifold. Then see if 5 and 7 still go lean.

Last edited by leojnknsC5; 05-12-2007 at 11:17 AM.
Old 05-12-2007, 11:50 AM
  #51  
RED99
Safety Car
 
RED99's Avatar
 
Member Since: Jul 2005
Location: Vancouver WA
Posts: 4,275
Likes: 0
Received 4 Likes on 2 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by APS
Bill, Number 5 and number 7 cylinders generally fail first as those cylinders run a much leaner air fuel ratio than all other cylinders. If you run lamba probles on all 8 cylinders as I have you will see why the #5 and #7 cylinders fail frequently.

Peter
Can you share some of your data with us? How much spread did you see between the richest and the leanest when you tested the AFR on all 8 cylinders?
If you are showing say 11:1 AFR in the collector, about how much leaner is the #7 running?
Old 05-12-2007, 02:28 PM
  #52  
FRCTony
Drifting
 
FRCTony's Avatar
 
Member Since: Mar 2005
Location: Northern VA
Posts: 1,737
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

Old 05-12-2007, 03:36 PM
  #53  
427 LS1
Pro
 
427 LS1's Avatar
 
Member Since: Aug 2003
Location: OC CA
Posts: 509
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

Something else to consider is switching to a Evans Water pump and T stat, they noted much less flow on the odd side bank, their pump evens out the flow on both banks and flows alot more than stock. May help keep things more stable...

Last edited by 427 LS1; 05-12-2007 at 09:12 PM.
Old 05-12-2007, 08:14 PM
  #54  
RED99
Safety Car
 
RED99's Avatar
 
Member Since: Jul 2005
Location: Vancouver WA
Posts: 4,275
Likes: 0
Received 4 Likes on 2 Posts

Default

I have been thinking the same thing. Along with there special waterless coolant.
Old 05-12-2007, 09:29 PM
  #55  
hex
Pro
 
hex's Avatar
 
Member Since: Mar 2006
Location: OKC OK
Posts: 583
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by 427 LS1
Something else to consider is switching to a Evans Water pump and T stat, they noted much less flow on the odd side bank, their pump evens out the flow on both banks and flows alot more than stock. May help keep things more stable...

I have been impressed with this setup over the years, on every engine type I have switched it to. Well worth it on a road racer.

I have had intake flow problems over the years on various engines, and they all have one or 2 cylinders running leaner than the others, and I just work the intake until I get the flow much closer to matched. 2% or less cylinder to cylinder flow variation seems to do the trick.

The guy that said do not push them to the freaking edge had a very good point, which leads to the dyno and AFR measurement arguments, as well. If your tuning data is not perfectly accurate, in combination with "tuning for numbers", these things tend to happen more often. Match the airflow, stay off the edge, use accurate tuning data, and the problem % goes way down.
Old 05-13-2007, 10:07 PM
  #56  
Robert56@RNS
Collections Hold
 
Robert56@RNS's Avatar
 
Member Since: May 2003
Location: Tacoma WA
Posts: 3,520
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default

GM should have known after 200 sprayed passes, upto 250rwhp hit, that upping the shot to 285rwhp on an absolutely bonestock longblock LS6, I would finally break a ringland. See my point, these motors are monsters from the factory, and with a spot on tune can go for some time at the limits. The only reason I had problems at 285rwhp was I messed my tune up and added 4* timing instead of pulling said timing. Can you guess what cylinder went with the resulting mega temps this motor saw, and 665rwtq at about 3500rpm. Oh and the a/f was 10.8 through out the dyno run.


Robert
Old 05-14-2007, 10:08 PM
  #57  
johncbourg
Drifting
 
johncbourg's Avatar
 
Member Since: Mar 2005
Posts: 1,832
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
St. Jude Donor '09
Default

Originally Posted by EnglandGreen
Toasted 5 & 7. The usual suspects.
Thats exactly what gave on mine
Old 05-15-2007, 03:09 PM
  #58  
BRETTROD
Instructor
 
BRETTROD's Avatar
 
Member Since: Nov 2006
Location: Shermans Dale (central) PA
Posts: 168
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

just went to the machine shop to check what the problem was on mine today. Of course, lucky number SEVEN!!!

mine isn't too bad.....looks like a slight flat on the piston spot where it may have gotten too hot and some dimples in the cylinder wall.


So what should I do on the rebuild?!?!?!?!

brett
Old 05-15-2007, 05:41 PM
  #59  
chriswtx
Le Mans Master
 
chriswtx's Avatar
 
Member Since: Feb 2002
Location: San Marcos Texas
Posts: 5,967
Received 4 Likes on 4 Posts

Default

rebuild forged..You might need a new block as well. Have it checked real well...



Quick Reply: The dreaded #7 destruction...



All times are GMT -4. The time now is 12:27 PM.