Another Fuel System thread- Step Inside
ECS System:
A&A system: 700+ rwhp
APS Fuel system ( Duel intank ): 600-1000rwhp 2003-2004
Lonnies Duel intank , 255l/hr duel: 600-1000rwhp 1998-2007
Aeromotive A1000 + Welbro 255 single intank: 500-900rwhp
Bosch 044(325l/hr) + Welbro 255 intank: 700-800rwhp
Bosch 044 duel: Est. 450-1100rwhp
Bosch 0581254 044 = 200 l/hr @ 5 bar at 12volts
324l/hr @ 43 psi
Bosch B261205 413 = 200 l/hr @ 8 BAR at 12volts
rating @ 43 psi ????
Aeromotive A1000 = 280 l/hr (450 lb/hr) @ 5 bar
rated 600 lb/hr @ 43 psi
Aeromotive Iliminator = 360 l/hr (575 lb/hr) @ 5 bar
rated 650 lb/hr @ 43 psi
Weldon 2015 = 325+l/hr
Well this is what i'd like to know.
What is the FI limits to different systems available today?
For example intank walbro 255 l/hr alone vs + Bosch 044 inline vs dual 255s vs 255 l intank + Aeromotive A1000 or Eliminator, etc. It would be nice to put it all in one place. You really can't go on size/flow of pump alone because some are parallel and some are in series. In addition boost pressure can make a small difference in flow as well.
One thing is see is the bosch 044 / walbro combo which flows 325lb/hr at 73 psi. That does not seem like enough for 800rwhp that people are getting out of the system.
Any ideas?
Post: System/ Horsepower/ auto or stick/ boost reference yes or no/ maximum boost/ and if possible estimate of total flow.
Thanks
Last edited by Hool97; Nov 3, 2007 at 05:15 PM. Reason: f/u info


not tested at real high hp yet, but seems like it should easily get me to 800 rwhp
Eliminator only runs when in boost....
Pump primes when key is turned to on...ou can hear it...but when in boost, you cannot over al the rest of the noise.
Overkill, unless looking or 1000 rwhp or better or if someone gives you one free...otherwise..there are other cheaper solutions.
I have the ffs fuel system.....but in any case, i would recommend running a second pump for boost only.....add up the flows to match your potential power level.
In my case, the 11104 alone is rated at 1000 fwhp after accesories and blower, so no real need for me to calculate anything else.along with the 255, i should have plenty of headroom.
Ask me how it works after I swap engines...
Last edited by RJW; Oct 16, 2007 at 03:58 PM.
Dan
The Best of Corvette for Corvette Enthusiasts
So Tom when do you activate the second pump 2 psi, 3 psi?
Last edited by Hool97; Oct 16, 2007 at 10:33 PM.
Hobbs switch is set at 5psi for the street.
At the track I unplug the Hobbs switch and run both pumps at the same time for safety....
ECS System:
A&A system: 700+ rwhp
APS Fuel system: 600-1000rwhp 2001-2004
Lonnies Duel intank , 255l/hr duel: 600-1000rwhp 1998-2007
Aeromotive A1000 + Welbro 255 single intank:
Bosch 044(325l/hr) + Welbro 255 intank: 700-800rwhp
Bosch 044 duel: Est. 450-1100rwhp
Bosch 0581254 044 = 324l/hr @ 5 bar
Aeromotive A1000 = 450l/hr @ 5 bar
rated 600 l/hr @ 43 psi
Aeromotive Iliminator = 575l/hr @ 5 bar
rated 650 l/hr @ 43 psi
Well this is what i'd like to know.
What is the FI limits to different systems available today?
For example intank walbro 255 l/hr alone vs + Bosch 044 inline vs dual 255s vs 255 l intank + Aeromotive A1000 or Eliminator, etc. It would be nice to put it all in one place. You really can't go on size/flow of pump alone because some are parallel and some are in series. In addition boost pressure can make a small difference in flow as well.
One thing is see is the bosch 044 / walbro combo which flows 325lb/hr at 73 psi. That does not seem like enough for 800rwhp that people are getting out of the system.
Any ideas?
Post: System/ Horsepower/ auto or stick/ boost reference yes or no/ maximum boost/ and if possible estimate of total flow.
Thanks
All that I can tell you is that I have made over 800rwhp easily with fuel system that I have. I suspect it could have fueled more hp as when it was being tuned on a load dyno...it was rich....and all that was really done over the course of the next pulls was to lean out the AFR.....the hp was increasing after each adjustment to the AFR, about 20-30hp. If I remember correctly it went something like 780, 800, 835 whp by just leaning it out (to 11.7)....18#s boost.
My 01 fuel system was moddified with the following:
60lb Mototrons
Aeromotive Regulator
MDMC billet adapter for rail w/aeroquip return line.
1997/8 Fuel Filter
LPE 255lbh pump
KB BAP
347cid.
As I mentioned during the first tune this system was supplying enough fuel to show it as rich.....and the readings were being taken with dual widebands immediately after the turbo on the downpipes....can't get much more accurate then that.
Car has made the same hp (within 5hp) on two different dynos, in two different parts of the state, during two different seasons of the year. (Synergy November 06, and A&A June 2007). Never missed a beat.
Based on consistant results, I think a lot of this fuel system stuff is bull****.
Last edited by Shinobi'sZ; Oct 17, 2007 at 10:51 AM.
My 01 fuel system was moddified with the following:
60lb Mototrons
Aeromotive Regulator
MDMC billet adapter for rail w/aeroquip return line.
1997/8 Fuel Filter
LPE 255lbh pump
KB BAP
347cid.
As I mentioned during the first tune this system was supplying enough fuel to show it as rich.....and the readings were being taken with dual widebands immediately after the turbo on the downpipes....can't get much more accurate then that.
Car has made the same hp (within 5hp) on two different dynos, in two different parts of the state, during two different seasons of the year. (Synergy November 06, and A&A June 2007). Never missed a beat.
Based on consistant results, I think a lot of this fuel system stuff is bull****.
This is the same system I am running on my car as mentioned above and I have Shinobiz to thank for it. Thanks for your advice Shinobiz, and your help in locating the needed parts, it has worked perfectly without issue.Thanks, Dan
The stock fuel feed is 3/8" in most places but does neck down to 1/4" in a few spots (gas bulkhead, plastic hose connectors). The fuel pump doesn't just push fuel through that line, but also fights against the filter and the checkvalve.
I found the stock filter and checkvalve are both very restrictive. Just replacing the filter frequently may be enough for some setups. Often you don't know the filter is clogged until the car starts acting up, or if a fuel pressure gauge exists, pressure slowly drops. A used filter is hard to blow through, and a clogged one that causes the car to act up you just can't blow through. Not good to put used components to your lips though, gasoline is toxic and people will look at you oddly.
The checkvalve is even more restrictive than a used fuel filter. However it's harder to replace because it's part of the stock plastic 'Y-connection' hose. After I removed it, I got a head rush trying to blow air through the damn thing. It may be worth looking into a checkvalve replacement.
Last edited by blu00rdstr; Oct 17, 2007 at 02:40 PM.
Yeah, maybe BS as far as sales and marketing, but every system has a limit.
You bring up a good point though about Turbos vs Blowers. The rwhp will be about 50-100 off for the same amount of fuel delivery. The motor must use some HP to turn the blower and that take more fuel. Also the increase in load needs a slighlty richer AFR to resist knock.
Thanks for the info.
Again another good point about return systems vs returnless and the ultimate Hp stablility of the system. We also have to becareful about what is possible with a system and what is routenely achieveable.
Im now using a pair of 044's. I just run them all the time. Havent had any problems with them yet, over 18 months usage, and maybe 12k.
Also do you run an intank pump as well? ( I figure with your set up that's a NO ).
But the same principle should apply no matter which setup one is running...if you have a system and it is providing enough fuel where you can continue to make adjustments in the tune to make it rich..then the fuel system is adequate. When I had my D1 with the stock pump and A1000...the afr was tailing off towards 13 in the upper rpms, no further adjustments could be made within the tune and the tuner told me that larger fuel injectors would fix it....I was doubtful at the time of this recommendation. Also this was kind of when people were tuning FI cars like NA cars...and a number of them switched to those larger fuel injectors (tuned by the same guy)... there cars blew up too.
Last edited by Shinobi'sZ; Oct 17, 2007 at 09:50 PM.
In reference to your post above...agreed that a supercharger application will place a higher load or at least appears from what I have seen to need more fuel.
But the same principle should apply no matter which setup one is running...if you have a system and it is providing enough fuel where you can continue to make adjustments in the tune to make it rich..then the fuel system is adequate. When I had my D1 with the stock pump and A1000...the afr was tailing off towards 13 in the upper rpms, no further adjustments could be made within the tune and the tuner told me that larger fuel injectors would fix it....I was doubtful at the time of this recommendation. Also this was kind of when people were tuning FI cars like NA cars...and a number of them switched to those larger fuel injectors (tuned by the same guy)... there cars blew up too.
Thank you, I understand what you're saying.
My personal plan was to go with a Weldon 14000 controller with a hob switch and rotary dial. Oh, and I have a 98 system so no need to add a return.
Last edited by Hool97; Oct 17, 2007 at 11:20 PM.
Puting one intank and running a second even in series would add a bit of headroom. That would be like 70 psi behind the second 044 increasing the flow at 5 bar 800 lb/hr.













