Knock Retard Question
I logged 2 runs from a dig 0 - 100 mph and noticed this, which I think is a little strange.
1st run with traction control on: no knock retard at all
2nd run with traction control off: 7deg of knock retard taking off from a dig, I was spinning the tires pretty good, 1-2 shift 7.2deg of knock retard, again spinning the tires pretty good. Also once I hooked up the knock retard would instantly drop to .02deg or 0deg again
My question. Is the knock retard I logged when driving with the traction control off a biproduct of losing traction and taking the load off the engine, it appears this is where it starts pulling timing? Secondly, is pulling 7deg of timing in this situation normal and safe for the engine?
[Modified by Shinobi'sZ, 10:25 PM 7/12/2003]


Detonation detected as KR will kill a FI setup fast. If you are consistently getting KR with your FI setup at WOT, then you need to back off your timing and proabably riched up the AF mixture. :yesnod:
[
Detonation detected as KR will kill a FI setup fast. If you are consistently getting KR with your FI setup at WOT, then you need to back off your timing and proabably riched up the AF mixture. :yesnod:


Also regarding the KR sensors, you can desensitize or even completley turn them off with LS1 Edit. For an FI car I would not recommend turning them off!


The Best of Corvette for Corvette Enthusiasts
Also regarding the KR sensors, you can desensitize or even completley turn them off with LS1 Edit. For an FI car I would not recommend turning them off!
The knock detection system on our cars is pretty sophisticated and the knowledge out there is very limited.
Here is what I know about it: There are two microphones positioned in the valley cover. The PCM listens to these microphones and has an algorithm for determining what frequency patterns constitute a knock event. Each knock event is calibrated in the PCM with some amount of timing retard (depending on RPM, temp, MAP…). I think it is generally about .5 degrees of timing in the high load range. So, if you are seeing 7 degrees of KR, it would mean that the PCM saw about 14 knock events. There is also a decay algorithm that attempts to restore the normal timing every 2 engine revolutions. It is typically set at 50%, so the amount of retard will get divided by 2 every 2 revolutions if no more knock events occur. The last feature is a knock learn algorithm. The PCM has a way of determining repeated patterns of KR, so it actually applies KR before it detects the knock events (very little seems to be known about exactly how this feature works).
Knock is more likely to happen under heavy load and increased cylinder pressure, so I doubt that spinning the tires and decreasing load would be the cause of your KR. It is more likely that your traction control is retarding timing and therefore limiting cylinder pressure.
Here are a few things that I would log to help understand your situation.
1. RPM
2. KR
3. Timing
4. MAF frequency or gm/s
5. Demanded AFR
6. IAT
7. Vehicle Speed
This will allow you to see what type of timing is being demanded just before the KR takes place. It will also allow you to see if the timing curve ends up being different with traction control on. MAF will be useful for seeing if/when your MAF maxes out and at what load the KR starts. Demanded AFR will give you some indication of what the current calibration is demanding for fuel.
BTW, I never had any luck with autotap giving me consistent and timely data. It is better than nothing, but I saw a lot of inconsistencies. EFI live on the other hand is awesome and well worth the extra money.
I would never desensitize the sensor. The only desensitizing I know of is reducing the amount of timing it pulls for each knock event. I don't think there is a way of changing what it does and does not consider being a knock event.
Backing off the timing if more for reducing cylinder pressure than it is for increasing AFR. The remaining fuel is a side effect of decreasing cylinder pressure.
[Modified by QuickSilver2002, 11:37 AM 7/13/2003]
I would never desensitize the sensor. The only desensitizing I know of is reducing the amount of timing it pulls for each knock event. I don't think there is a way of changing what it does and does not consider being a knock event.
[Modified by QuickSilver2002, 11:37 AM 7/13/2003]
That is the only part I disagree with or would like to know more about. The rest :iagree:
[Modified by Shinobi'sZ, 10:24 AM 7/13/2003]
That is the only part I disagree with or would like to know more about. The rest :iagree:


With LS1 Edit you can desentize the knock sensors in many ways to correct for false knock. I would not recommend you do this until you have determined for sure the knock is false. You can adjust the attack and decay rates at which the KR pull timing and then put it back in. Additionally you can set the max amount of KR allowed to be pulled out.
Regarding the misfires I do this to with large cams. Basically you just inrease the tolderances in all the tables for the amount of misfires allowed per cylinder. This can prevent the infamouns p300 codes, fix tq converted lock and unlock problems, and solve idle issues with flashing check engine lights.




Godspeed thanks for the breakdown on how to perform what I was describing to Quicksilver. I am not got into the computer stuff just the bolt on and motor stuff with our cars. I rely on what programmers tell me, what you described to me is what MMS did with my P300 codes. I am thankful that you verified what you posted because I couldn't verify what Quick was saying..what he was saying sounded Logical so I could respond with the specifics. Looks like we all gained some valuable info.
:cheers:
Here is the interesting part of our R&D from this morning, After the run say up to 100-120mph / 3rd gear shift I would let off the throttle completely and KR would jump to 7 or 8, but not every time. My passenger noticed that the KR appeared to jump up only when the exhaust would pop on decel, I thought he was nuts so we did it a few more times and guess what every time the exhaust popped on decel the KR would spike. The sensors are picking up the exhaust detonation and treating it like engine detonation.
Which brings me to the next question, since the engine is not under boost and decelerating this shouldn't be a concern, right?
You stated it picks it up (KR) when its spinning the tires etc, which has a lot less load on it then when hooked up and pulling the mass of the vehicle. The give away is it drops to zero when its hooked up under full load and nothing on a traction control run.
Phil
Godspeed thanks for the breakdown on how to perform what I was describing to Quicksilver. I am not got into the computer stuff just the bolt on and motor stuff with our cars. I rely on what programmers tell me, what you described to me is what MMS did with my P300 codes. I am thankful that you verified what you posted because I couldn't verify what Quick was saying..what he was saying sounded Logical so I could respond with the specifics. Looks like we all gained some valuable info.
:cheers:
What I said was right, but obviously not very clear. There is no way to desensitize the knock sensors with ls1edit. Read what godspeed wrote carefully. He is talking about reducing the amount of attack and increasing the amount of decay against the knock counts. This is not at all like what you can do to desensitize the misfire detection. In misfire detection, you can adjust the tolerance in microseconds between two normal firing points to say what is and what is not a misfire.
So to be clear, you can adjust the action taken when knock is detected (at a given load/rpm), but you cannot adjust what is considered a knock event. This may seem like a trivial distinction, but I feel that it is not. If you reduce the action taken when a knock is detected the pcm won’t do anything different if a stronger more pronounced knock event occurs at that same point. Does this make sense? Again, if someone has specifics that prove this wrong, please post.
BTW, there is also a type of knock that has nothing to do with hearing knock, There is also a type called burst knock based on the detection of a delta in airflow (but I have never seen it happen).
There is no doubt that the KR detection system is a double edged sword.
[Modified by QuickSilver2002, 4:37 PM 7/13/2003]
Here is the interesting part of our R&D from this morning, After the run say up to 100-120mph / 3rd gear shift I would let off the throttle completely and KR would jump to 7 or 8, but not every time. My passenger noticed that the KR appeared to jump up only when the exhaust would pop on decel, I thought he was nuts so we did it a few more times and guess what every time the exhaust popped on decel the KR would spike. The sensors are picking up the exhaust detonation and treating it like engine detonation.
Which brings me to the next question, since the engine is not under boost and decelerating this shouldn't be a concern, right?
Something to remember, most of us are maxing out the maf and have our fuel calculation basically hard coded to RPM. Maxing out the MAF means that the computer can no longer adjust for changes in air density or flow, so you can easily go from a safe AF to and unsafe AF. The trick is to be on the way safe side. Most people don't do this because they want the most HP possible during the dyno tune.
Maybe I’m just ignorant at this point, but I think most of the tuners have people fooled into thinking that this tuning thing is pretty consistent on an FI motor. I have personally found it to be very inconsistent and non repeatable from day to day. Again, this could be something specific to my setup or my lack of knowledge, but only time will tell. I have several more things to try (but my laptop and clutch are down right now). I would just suggest not being greedy and keep it on the safe side.








