When you click on links to various merchants on this site and make a purchase, this can result in this site earning a commission. Affiliate programs and affiliations include, but are not limited to, the eBay Partner Network.
How much difference is there between the two? I have heard that singles are more efficient, how much rwhp difference is there? I have also heard that the dual units require more plumbing, how much does it increase the install complexity? Lastly, does ATI and Vortech offer both versions?
Just to clarify, the #s in this post are based on two modifications to the ATI kit. The air filter was moved up front and the dual intercoolers were replaced with a single front mount.
There is another post out there about HP change, you will have to search.
Single intercooler will yeild:
1) Higher cooling efficiency due to increased surface
2) less pressure drop across the core(more boost at the motor)
Phillip
In front of the radiator right on top of the ac condesor. You need to modify the radiator mount not the actuall radiator itself. YOu have to cut the lower radiator support bar off the frame savers. Bend the frame savers closer together and weld it back on farther forward on the car so the radiator will lay down more. I know more when I finish next week.
I did before/after dynotune with the only change being the A&A Single Intercooler(FMIC on dyno). I gained 42rwhp before it started missing at 6,000rpm (125mph). I believe I missed about another 20rwhp on the dynosheet because I didn't know about the miss until I started driving it. I fixed the miss with plugs and wires.
This is a photo of the HP/MPH, Baseline is 480, FMIC is 490, FMIC tuned is 522 (measured at the 125mph line).
This is a photo of the TQ/RPM, Baseline is 438, FMIC is 442, FMIC tuned is 472.
So the gain is actually from aggressive tuning is what it sounds like. The hp/tq pickup without tuning wasn't all that great. Looks like the A/F is much leaner after the FMIC.
So the gain is actually from aggressive tuning is what it sounds like. The hp/tq pickup without tuning wasn't all that great. Looks like the A/F is much leaner after the FMIC.
It was set a full point leaner after FMIC. The 'before' dynotune was to their best, according to MMS.
So the gain is actually from aggressive tuning is what it sounds like. The hp/tq pickup without tuning wasn't all that great. Looks like the A/F is much leaner after the FMIC.
The car was richened up significantly. There is still a few ponies left on the table...when the intake charge is colder you can lead the spark more.
Phillip :cheers:
So the gain is actually from aggressive tuning is what it sounds like. The hp/tq pickup without tuning wasn't all that great. Looks like the A/F is much leaner after the FMIC.
The car was richened up significantly. There is still a few ponies left on the table...when the intake charge is colder you can lead the spark more.
Phillip :cheers:
Maybe I am just looking at the posted dyno sheet wrong, but it looks like he went from somewhere around 11:1 to 12:1 + A/F :confused:
From the hazy copies I have, it looks like 'before FMIC' was 12.5, and 'after FMIC' is about 13.3 or 13.5. Andy told me MMS had to lean it out a full point after the FMIC.
I found my invoice, MMS performed:
<li>Computer reprogram LS1
<li>Dyno Tuning first hour, inc wide band
<li>Dyno Tuning additional hour
<li>Computer retune LS1
<li>Dyno Tuning first hour, inc wide band
From the hazy copies I have, it looks like 'before FMIC' was 12.5, and 'after FMIC' is about 13.3 or 13.5. Andy told me MMS had to lean it out a full point after the FMIC.
I would think that is too lean for a FI motor. I'm not as smart as most of the people around here. I thought I read that on a blown car, the most you would wnat is 12-5-12.8 :confused: :confused:
I would think that is too lean for a FI motor. I'm not as smart as most of the people around here. I thought I read that on a blown car, the most you would wnat is 12-5-12.8 :confused: :confused:
Well, let me put it this way: I lost a cylinder and am about to begin assembling the parts I bought.
Well, unfortunately that motor is now literally blown. So I guess it may have been a little lean. There is no doubt that leaning it out produces more power, but the stock pistons and ringlands just can’t take it for long.
Here is another question: Is the Vortech aftercooler as efficient as the ATI single intercooler? Also is the charge temp a bigger issue with cars that have a higher compression ratio?
Here is another question: Is the Vortech aftercooler as efficient as the ATI single intercooler?
You will have a tough time getting a clear answer on this. I would guess that a big single air to air is more efficient, but the aftercooler may perform just as well with cool water. I would guess the big single air to air would be more efficient overall. This is just a guess.
Also is the charge temp a bigger issue with cars that have a higher compression ratio?
Another tough one to answer with a simple yes/no. Detonation sensitivity is increased with pressure, heat, and fuel instability. A higher compression motor is going to be generally more sensitive than a low compression motor. This is why you will see the recommended boost levels being lower for the ls6 vs the ls1.On the other hand, a high compression motor needs less boost to make the same power. You can actually create more power with lower static pressure and higher dynamic pressure via boost, but you will sacrifice drivability in non boost conditions and the internals have to be stonger to deal with the higher pressure and heat.