Odd Behavior from Racetronix
I am 99% confident that my fuel pressure gauge is accurately displaying fuel pressure because my car runs MUCH stronger at 69psi than it does at 61psi. In fact, in some cases I can hear minor pinging when my fuel pressure idles at 61psi and I'm at WOT. :eek: :eek:
I have talked to Andy and he didn't have any ideas off the top of his head why this would happen. I am going to replace the fuel pump and cross my fingers that the problem goes away. But if it doesn't, what can I do to help regulate fuel pressure? Is there a pressure regulator I can use so that it never goes over 61psi? Would a boost-a-pump help out? Voltage itself does not appear to be the problem since voltage is the same when I'm at 69psi vs. 61psi. Could it be amperage? :confused:
Also, just for my information, please post back your idle fuel pressure if you're running a Racetronix. I'd like to know if I have the only Frankenstein here running such high pressure.
[Modified by diynoob, 5:07 PM 1/18/2004]
[Modified by diynoob, 5:08 PM 1/18/2004]
Sorry I did not read the last part of your post. Prior to plumbing a return system I had just the Racetronix and the pressure was at 58 to 59 until I jumped on it then it went down to 45 or so them right back up. Now with the new fuel rails and Aeromotive regulator I have it set to 58 at atmosphere and then goes to 64 at WOT and 54 - 56 at vacuum. I still have a bit of pressure drop when I jump on it really hard. I am looking at adding my Vortech booster pump back on working towards 0 drop at WOT
[Modified by Steve'01, 3:27 PM 1/18/2004]
I saw your return system writeup earlier. Very :cool: I think I would like to get to that kind of setup eventually. But right now I am just not sure why the setup I have, on a very mild car, is not working quite right.
I hope it is as easy as swapping the pump. I have already swapped the fuel filter which helped quite a bit, but I am not sure what else it could be.
[Modified by corvette184, 1:14 AM 1/19/2004]
[Modified by corvette184, 1:14 AM 1/19/2004]
:confused:
[Modified by drcoffee, 8:08 PM 1/18/2004]
It's the regulator, not the pump. The regulator is sensitive to heat and the pressure drops as the heat of the fuel goes up.
I noticed my stock pump doing the same thing, but it got much more noticeable with the stronger racetronix pump – it overtakes the regulators ability to regulate at low demands. I would see 64 in the mornings and 58 in the afternoon after the car had really heated up. I thought it was caused by reduced voltage from the alternator then I noticed that the pressure would shoot back up when I put in a cold tank of gas (suddenly the mystery was solved). It was really noticeable on hot days.
I finally came to the conclusion that the regulator in the filter is junk for high HP applications (I'm sure others will chime in and say they made x HP with it….. but it does not take a rocket scientist so see why the design poor). Not only is it in the wrong place, but it has to regulate without the help of a vacuum source (this makes it susceptible to heat… ). You can get buy with it, but it makes tuning a royal PITA.
I just put in the '97 return system in my car (it was very very easy since the car is already provisioned for it - the only thing missing is the line and the rail). I have not ran the car hard yet, but might have some results and a writeup tomorrow. I have the ability to log fuel pressure, so I should be able to do a before/after graph.
Have you been getting any additional noise from your pump?
The Best of Corvette for Corvette Enthusiasts


It's the regulator, not the pump. The regulator is sensitive to heat and the pressure drops as the heat of the fuel goes up.
I noticed my stock pump doing the same thing, but it got much more noticeable with the stronger racetronix pump – it overtakes the regulators ability to regulate at low demands. I would see 64 in the mornings and 58 in the afternoon after the car had really heated up. I thought it was caused by reduced voltage from the alternator then I noticed that the pressure would shoot back up when I put in a cold tank of gas (suddenly the mystery was solved). It was really noticeable on hot days.
I finally came to the conclusion that the regulator in the filter is junk for high HP applications (I'm sure others will chime in and say they made x HP with itÂ….. but it does not take a rocket scientist so see why the design poor). Not only is it in the wrong place, but it has to regulate without the help of a vacuum source (this makes it susceptible to heatÂ… ). You can get buy with it, but it makes tuning a royal PITA.
I just put in the '97 return system in my car (it was very very easy since the car is already provisioned for it - the only thing missing is the line and the rail). I have not ran the car hard yet, but might have some results and a writeup tomorrow. I have the ability to log fuel pressure, so I should be able to do a before/after graph.
VR :cheers:
Have you been getting any additional noise from your pump?
Glad you mentioned that. I am a nimrod and can't believe I completely forgot to mention that there IS increased noise when my fuel pressure drops down. To me, it sounds like the sound water would make passing through a pipe that's too small. This happened with my old pump, although it was not nearly as noticeable... with the new pump the noise is a bit louder.
I don't have a boost-a-pump but it sounds like we're describing the exact same noise. It sounds like QuickSilver is on to something in his post above. When you upgrade to the '97 style rails, do you have to do the return line? Steve01's setup he posted a while back looked real :cool: and I'd love to do that to my car, I'm just not sure what kind of work is involved.
Remember, the pump is generally always pumping the same volume, but the rate of consumption is constantly changing at the rail. So at idle, there is a lot of fuel going back into the tank. The pump never slows down (I don't think most people realize this).






After closely monitering fuel pressure on long canyon runs, it was very clear that a few things dirrectly effect fuel pressure.
... Heat is a major factor, increase heat, potential loss of pressure.
.... As the fuel pump heats up and works harder it too is less eficient
.... Injector size is critical with high boost. You can get away with smaller injectors until things heat up, then they will become far less efficient.
....Gas can become vaperized under heavy pressure and heated conditions.
.... The wine is your fuel pump staining under the workload of the heat and supply demands.
Since I have a 98, I have the return line already. I have the regulator on the rail set at 60 psi. I run the LPE pump with a KB BAP. I run a vacuum line via a selonoid, which engages at 3#s of boost from the BAP pressure senser, to the fuel pressure regulator. This allows the car to run at 60psi untill I hit 3#s of boost, at which point I climb on a one for one basis to around 67psi at 10#s of boost.
The fuel system took a lot of work, just don't blow the motor while you sort it out.
Good luck
JB
I like the look of the billet setup but I'm curious what these parts cost from GM, so anybody (hint hint QuickSilver) who's done this I'd love to hear your experiences/costs.
:cheers:
If you are really hot to get this mod going, I have attached a pic of a cart from http://www.gmpartsdirect.com with all the stuff you will need.
A few things to mention.
There is one part missing from the cart that is not required, but you will probably want it. It is the braided supply jumper line from the rail to the hard line (the return one is already listed). The existing one works, but it is too short and you really need the correct length to get the factory look. I have my original on, but I had to bend the hard line out and it looks pretty cheesy. I'm looking for that part# now and will include it in my final post. It should be about $30 more. I'm also looking into what it takes to make the existing fuel rail cover fit (or if the '97 style will fit, they will never fit unless you get the longer supply jumper).
You can probably get some of these parts used if you look around. I got the rail and the regulator for $150 shipped from a guy over on ls1tech.com that had purchased them, but never installed.
Also, the lines actually include two lines that could be used for the return. You could double up with someone and share the cost or something like that. One line is the return and the other is the EVAP line. They seem to be identical in size material... but the bends are quite different in the rear (the evap line is much longer but you can easily bend it down and get it where you need it. I will sell mine cheap if someone wants it (the shipping could be expensive - it is a big long box).
The mod is very easy. Everthing pretty much slips right in. The lines (a cluster of 3) are actually identical to what is on the car, but there is just an extra one in the middle. If you take your tunnle cover off you will notice that the current plastic line retainers actually have room for another line. They simply deleted the return in the newer cars.
The only pain about the install is that you have to take the exahust, intake manifold, and tunnel off the car. After that, it is a 30 minute deal.
I will post more details and some pics after I get my car running and tuned. I don't know why I'm even bothering putting it back together, I just pulled the trigger on my new motor today and will be doing that install in about a month. I figured I would try to work out a few more tuning kinks on this one while I don't have much to loose (just don't want to damage the heads).
Changing the system to a front-mounted FPR system with return is the answer to all these problems.
A Charged Air Systems regulator is about $130.00, -6 TFE industrial line and fittings about $50.00. (Keep away from the rubber Aeroquip type lines)
Use the factory feed line. Silver solder two -6 fittings to the end of the factory rails and run lines into either side of the FPR. Run the -6 TFE line back into the tank with a bulkhead fitting w/o-ring. The factory return line can be used but an adapter fitting will have to be silver-soldered onto the stainless line. If the factory return is not used then make sure the fuel is directed back into the fuel module / bucket. Plug the return outlet on the factory fuel filter. Total parts cost of this conversion less labor should be under $200.00.
[Modified by Racetronix, 11:48 PM 1/19/2004]
Nice easy fix :D
Nice easy fix :D
I used to idle at about 66-67psi prior to replacing the stock fuel filter at 26K miles, now I idle at about 69psi. But I can still see 61psi at idle after I get the car good and hot.
I just wanted to post back that I have finally experienced the exact same thing. I rarely ever run my car down to E (usually fill up at 1/2 or 3/4 tank) but I was just so busy the last week that I didn't get to fill up. My fuel pressure was all the way down at 61 today where it rests when the car is hot, and right after I put in a full tank of fuel, my pressure was right back up to 69. I guess usually when I only put a little fuel in, it's not cold enough to affect the temperature of the rest of the hot fuel already in the tank, so I never noticed it until today.
Thanks for posting the other writeup on going to the 97 style fuel setup. I am hoping to get that mod done this coming weekend and solve most of my fuel delivery issues.
:cheers:










