When you click on links to various merchants on this site and make a purchase, this can result in this site earning a commission. Affiliate programs and affiliations include, but are not limited to, the eBay Partner Network.
I have a G-tech too and found that prior to installing my new blower that around 2700 RPM's was optimal too. I am still getting used to the new blower and only had a few runs, but your time is still way better then mine are.
With your HP you should be running more like 11.85 in the 1/4 not 12.85. I have the A&A set up and Kooks 1 7/8 headers 551 hp 496 tq. Have not been to the track yet, but i have raced my freinds 99FRC with H&C and pulled him pretty good. He runs 11.8 in the 1/4.
I guess I just expected to see sub 4 second 0-60 times... GM claims that the Z06 can do it in 4.0 I figured with 520 some HP I should be able to beat it.
Now I do understand that it was a country road, and not a prepped drag surface.. maybe that has a lot more to do with it than I think.
Most of us will likely never run numbers like the manufacturers claim. Those drivers are professionals, driving under ideal circumstances. Doing hard launches and shifting without the clutch or letting up on the gas. My soft launch recently with 480 RWHP and 470 RWTQ was 5.3 I think I can get it down a bit with a launch around 2700-3000. Other then that I think realistically we would need better tires and a lot more practice to get much quicker.
Brian-
Do you have to make the 1 to 2 shift? I don't know what your redline is but with 3.42s, I'd think you can come close to 60 in first- right?
ps- I just bought nittos to run all the time in prep for the A&A ATI set up. You might consider them too as a stickier tire that will still hold up fairly well in the turns.
Redline in first is like 53mph, just short of not having to shift. I know the Ford GT-40 shifts right at 62mph and that is how they could get such a low #.
I am using the clutch and letting off the throttle a smidge. But I have no desire to ruin my tranny or synchro's.
Majority of Magazine times are done with a radar gun, not at a real track.
You should be a lot more concerned about your mph in the 1/4 rather than your ET. Et will be more influenced by traction, or lack of, where as mph shows power. You should be around 125mph traps.
I think some of it is related to tuning. It is often tough to get all the fat holes out of the transition on a part throttle launch.
This is something I'm just starting to explore and I don't think many people understand it yet.
I pledged long ago to never explore fat holes.
Maybe I should have said rich holes.
I'm just finding that the maf gets pretty inaccurate when you first launch the car and the RPMs drop. The PCM seems to use VE to calc airflow more when the throttle transitions at low RPMs.
With a trap speed of only 113 mph there is no way you are making 525 rwhp! If that is what the dyno said it lied, your stock Z06 goes 113/114 mph! I suggest something is wackey in wakersville!
With a trap speed of only 113 mph there is no way you are making 525 rwhp! If that is what the dyno said it lied, your stock Z06 goes 113/114 mph! I suggest something is wackey in wakersville!
I would tend to trust the dyno over a G-tech any day. He did not run at a track. Read the orginal post again.
I'm just finding that the maf gets pretty inaccurate when you first launch the car and the RPMs drop. The PCM seems to use VE to calc airflow more when the throttle transitions at low RPMs.
This stuff is just starting to get figured out.
[Modified by QuickSilver2002, 10:37 PM 5/5/2004]
OK, that makes total sense. I agree with you -- it seems that from a dead launch both of my C5s have "bogged" a little more in the low RPMs than other manual cars I've owned. Even if you get the car moving at 5MPH and then nail it, the car seems to move better than trying to launch from a dead stop at similar RPMs.
This is a little confusing but I will do my best. The magazines use a radar gun when testing 0-60 and 1/4 mile times. The G-Tech uses an onboard accelerometer that measures differences in acceleration forces from start to finish and has an onboard chonometer to reference accleration rates to time. It then calculates a number of parameters from the given information including what you programed in as the weight of the car to be. Being on an open road, many other vairables can wreck havoc as well including but not limited to wind, grade of the road, temp, altitude, surfacing of the road, and even placement of the G-Tech on the dash.
So what does this mean The bottom line is that the the G-Tech is very precise, but not always accurate. I found on mine when running at a dragstrip that is whas always about .3-.5 seconds slower than the timeslip was showing. IMHO the horsepower reading on the G-Tech is junk.
The G-tech is good though at telling you whether a mod made much of a difference or not, or testing lateral-g's in a skidpad test. Just have to do your best to keep all of the other variables equal.