Notices
C5 General General C5 Corvette and C5 Z06 Discussion not covered in Tech
Sponsored by:
Sponsored by:

More effective: Dynamat/Frost King or Non-Runflats

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 04-30-2005, 02:20 PM
  #1  
rcs128
Melting Slicks
Thread Starter
 
rcs128's Avatar
 
Member Since: Apr 2005
Posts: 3,469
Likes: 0
Received 4 Likes on 2 Posts

Default More effective: Dynamat/Frost King or Non-Runflats

What's the best first step in cutting down the noise in a C5 coupe... installing sound-proofing material like Dynamat or replacing the tires with quieter, non-runflats?
Old 04-30-2005, 02:25 PM
  #2  
MyVetteDream
Race Director
Support Corvetteforum!
 
MyVetteDream's Avatar
 
Member Since: Feb 2004
Location: HOW FAST WAS I GOING OFFICER? Los Angeles Hating GM Dealership Service Dept.'s Since Sept. 2004
Posts: 11,651
Likes: 0
Received 6 Likes on 5 Posts
St. Jude Donor '04-'05-'06-'07

Default

I've heard tires. But I've done the sound deadening and have EMT's ... it worked for my taste. Can't imagine what doing both would have done.
Maybe 6 of one, half a dozen of the other IMO.

Last edited by MyVetteDream; 04-30-2005 at 02:32 PM.
Old 04-30-2005, 02:30 PM
  #3  
c5BlackBeauty
Corvette C5 Enthusiast

Support Corvetteforum!
 
c5BlackBeauty's Avatar
 
Member Since: Dec 2002
Location: In The Zone
Posts: 10,638
Received 55 Likes on 47 Posts
St. Jude Donor '05, '12-'13, '15-'16, '21

Default

My vote would be to do the interior sound proofing first.
Ton's of posts on using Dynamat and Frost King.

Also you may want to check out http://www.exoticvette.com/Exotic%20Vette/index.htm -

forum member/sponsor who has a pretty neat kit.
Old 04-30-2005, 02:31 PM
  #4  
F.J.B.
Le Mans Master
 
F.J.B.'s Avatar
 
Member Since: Jul 2004
Location: Vette Doctors Performance RX450 - 466RWHP !!!
Posts: 5,216
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

I didnt notice much difference after the rear frost king install.

Added the AOS tunnel plate and that made a major difference.

Next would be a nice set of tires!!!
Old 04-30-2005, 02:38 PM
  #5  
Bob's C5
Racer
 
Bob's C5's Avatar
 
Member Since: Mar 2003
Location: NW Suburban Chicago IL
Posts: 300
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

I first bought the Frost King insulation and not have had the time to install it. I installed a new set of wheels, non-runflats and I am now debating if I should just return the Frost King.
IMHO the tire change really made a great differance.
Old 04-30-2005, 03:23 PM
  #6  
rcs128
Melting Slicks
Thread Starter
 
rcs128's Avatar
 
Member Since: Apr 2005
Posts: 3,469
Likes: 0
Received 4 Likes on 2 Posts

Default

Thanks for all the input. Sounds like either choice is a good choice.
Old 04-30-2005, 04:21 PM
  #7  
CUlookin
Le Mans Master
 
CUlookin's Avatar
 
Member Since: Jun 2004
Location: Silver Spring MD
Posts: 6,654
Likes: 0
Received 5 Likes on 5 Posts

Default

You're only going to get a bias answer here. I spent 15 or so hours doing the Dynamat and thinks it's the best...

Someone who did the frost king and spent all their time doing it will say it is the best...

I think either one will work, it all depends on how much time and money you have, and how much effort you're willing to put into it!
Old 04-30-2005, 04:29 PM
  #8  
gsmileyoh
Advanced
 
gsmileyoh's Avatar
 
Member Since: Mar 2005
Location: Grove CIty Ohio
Posts: 83
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Brother-in-law and myself did my 02 with reflectix took about 6 hours total, cut the noise considerably. But I'm sure the New Non-runflats, Gdyr F1 GS-D3's getting installed next weekend will finalize it all.
Good Luck in whatever you attempt.
Old 04-30-2005, 05:24 PM
  #9  
98silverC5
Pro
 
98silverC5's Avatar
 
Member Since: Mar 2002
Location: Colchester VT
Posts: 527
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

I've done all three, here is my opinion from most effective to least.

New tires (Bridgestone S03's)
Dynamat (I used Brown Bread, cheaper)
Frost King (helped some but also made car cooler)

Good luck!
Old 04-30-2005, 06:17 PM
  #10  
AFVETTE
Team Owner
 
AFVETTE's Avatar
 
Member Since: Sep 1999
Location: Swansea IL
Posts: 20,076
Received 41 Likes on 28 Posts

Default

I'd pass on the Frost King mod, I started off using DynaMat ran out and finished with Frost King. While I was happy with the noise reduction I felt after handling both DynaMat and Frost King that Frost King isn't in the same league as DynaMat. So I bought some more DynaMat and went over the area I did with Forst King. I could tell the difference.

My advice, if you are going to tear your car apart and spend the time, effort and money - do it right. Buy a product specifically designed for the task.

Here's a before and after photo of my project and you can see where the DynaMat ends and the Frost King starts.

You want noise, try a Z with B&B PRT's and no insulation


DynaMat and Frost King in place


There is no comparison, buy DynaMat.

Tom
Old 05-01-2005, 12:25 AM
  #11  
YBNORML
Pro
 
YBNORML's Avatar
 
Member Since: Apr 2004
Location: Gaithersburg MD
Posts: 557
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

There is also a product called Hushmat that I used and didn't cut my fingers at all. Look at www.hushmat.com. Also, I removed the wheel wells and insulated the cavities with R-19 and covered it up with reflektix. It worked well for reducing the sound of the tires. I'm afraid of using non-runflats, don't ever want my car towed for a flat tire.

[IMG][/IMG]
[IMG][IMG][IMG][/IMG]
[IMG][/IMG]
http://img.photobucket.com/albums/v622/ybnorml1/DSC00197.jpg[/IMG][/IMG]
[IMG][IMG]
[IMG][IMG][IMG][/IMG]
[IMG][/IMG]
[IMG][/IMG]
[IMG][/IMG]
[IMG][/IMG]
[IMG][/IMG]

Last edited by YBNORML; 05-01-2005 at 12:33 AM.

Get notified of new replies

To More effective: Dynamat/Frost King or Non-Runflats




Quick Reply: More effective: Dynamat/Frost King or Non-Runflats



All times are GMT -4. The time now is 11:18 AM.