When you click on links to various merchants on this site and make a purchase, this can result in this site earning a commission. Affiliate programs and affiliations include, but are not limited to, the eBay Partner Network.
Just wanted to say that GM engineers need to build a better automatic overdrive transmission. Since the 80's, all the rear-drive overdrive transmissions had problems.
Whether it was the 2004R or the 700R4. Both STOCK factory transmission were weak and would break hard-parts with any HP level over 300HP.
Even the A4 or 4L60E on our C5s can't handle anything over 350HP. Even the new C6 auto trans, the 4l65E, is rated to 400HP & 385 LBS.FT.
A trans should be able to handle at least 100HP/75 LBS.FT or torque OVER the stock HP of the engine. Why build something that can handle only the HP of the engine. That is walking a fine line between it breaking. Add some mods and BOOM, there goes the trans.
They really need to hire the transmission engineers from overseas. They can build better OD units.
Just wanted to say that GM engineers need to build a better automatic overdrive transmission. Since the 80's, all the rear-drive overdrive transmissions had problems.
Whether it was the 2004R or the 700R4. Both STOCK factory transmission were weak and would break hard-parts with any HP level over 300HP.
Even the A4 or 4L60E on our C5s can't handle anything over 350HP. Even the new C6 auto trans, the 4l65E, is rated to 400HP & 385 LBS.FT.
A trans should be able to handle at least 100HP/75 LBS.FT or torque OVER the stock HP of the engine. Why build something that can handle only the HP of the engine. That is walking a fine line between it breaking. Add some mods and BOOM, there goes the trans.
They really need to hire the transmission engineers from overseas. They can build better OD units.
I dont disagree with you, but where did you get your numbers on the C5 tranny not being able to handle 350 hp? Seems a bit low to me.
I agree. I KO'ed mine last year (killed the 3-4 clutchpak). Had a friend rebuild it with Alto Red clutches, Kevlar band and a shift kit. Now it shifts like a maniac and tranny temps are a little lower.
The information on the auto transmissions is found on the GM web-site. They state that:
4L60E - max torque of 370 LB.FT. (C5's)
4L65E - max torque of 400 Lb-Ft (C6's)
4L85E - max torque of 440 LB-FT (trucks only)
GM is producing auto transmissions that are on the BRINK of failure to the engines that are connected to. The LS1 was at 360 Lb-Ft and the NEW LS2 is 400 Lb-Ft. The auto transmissions MAX power ratings that they can handle is equal to the output of the engine.
Any MODS and BOOM - there goes the trans.
YES, my A4 blew with only 9000 miles and the only MODS were LS6 H&C and a tune.
The information on the auto transmissions is found on the GM web-site. They state that:
4L60E - max torque of 370 LB.FT. (C5's)
4L65E - max torque of 400 Lb-Ft (C6's)
4L85E - max torque of 440 LB-FT (trucks only)
GM is producing auto transmissions that are on the BRINK of failure to the engines that are connected to. The LS1 was at 360 Lb-Ft and the NEW LS2 is 400 Lb-Ft. The auto transmissions MAX power ratings that they can handle is equal to the output of the engine.
Any MODS and BOOM - there goes the trans.
YES, my A4 blew with only 9000 miles and the only MODS were LS6 H&C and a tune.
Sorry to hear about the the trans. Will GM repair it under the warranty? Some guy I met rebuilt mine and it works great now. I bought the parts and he did the work. Took him 4 weeks to get around to my tranny but other than that, my little 150 shot and that rebuild gave me the "Perma-Grin". PM me if you need some more info.
Just wanted to say that GM engineers need to build a better automatic overdrive transmission. Since the 80's, all the rear-drive overdrive transmissions had problems.
Whether it was the 2004R or the 700R4. Both STOCK factory transmission were weak and would break hard-parts with any HP level over 300HP.
Even the A4 or 4L60E on our C5s can't handle anything over 350HP. Even the new C6 auto trans, the 4l65E, is rated to 400HP & 385 LBS.FT.
A trans should be able to handle at least 100HP/75 LBS.FT or torque OVER the stock HP of the engine. Why build something that can handle only the HP of the engine. That is walking a fine line between it breaking. Add some mods and BOOM, there goes the trans.
They really need to hire the transmission engineers from overseas. They can build better OD units.
GM knows the specs of the engine and transmission they install. They do not offer a more powerful motor that what the transmission can handle. You modify the engine, break the tranny, then get upset at GM? Who installed aftermarket parts, thus exceeding the specifications? It sure wasn't GM...
Remember this: you have to pay to play.
GM cuts costs to offer the best car they can within a set price point (choosing transmissions that are appropriate for the stock HP/TQ levels is part of that). The Corvette line always makes money, and choosing the proper components has a lot to do with it.
I feel your pain, but I think you are not looking at things in perspective...
Just wanted to say that GM engineers need to build a better automatic overdrive transmission. Since the 80's, all the rear-drive overdrive transmissions had problems.
Whether it was the 2004R or the 700R4. Both STOCK factory transmission were weak and would break hard-parts with any HP level over 300HP.
Even the A4 or 4L60E on our C5s can't handle anything over 350HP. Even the new C6 auto trans, the 4l65E, is rated to 400HP & 385 LBS.FT.
A trans should be able to handle at least 100HP/75 LBS.FT or torque OVER the stock HP of the engine. Why build something that can handle only the HP of the engine. That is walking a fine line between it breaking. Add some mods and BOOM, there goes the trans.
They really need to hire the transmission engineers from overseas. They can build better OD units.
Don't know the HP or TQ ratings but a new 6 speed auto will debut in the 06 Corvette.
If you think GM ATX is bad, don't even try Mazda or Mitsubishi. My old MX6 ATX was trash. My current 3000GT VR4 ATX is even worse. However, the fix that I implemented for both of them helped extend their reliability by 100 fold (exaggerating). And I'm sure it'll do the same for the C5 ATX Tranny. I've noticed some posts of the temps the ATX trannies run.. and they are ridiculously high (above 200). I had the same probs w/ the VR4, and installed a heavy duty tranny cooler. It now runs reliably under 170.
From: The second childhood is the best one of all.
Originally Posted by pettrix
Just wanted to say that GM engineers need to build a better automatic overdrive transmission. Since the 80's, all the rear-drive overdrive transmissions had problems.
Whether it was the 2004R or the 700R4. Both STOCK factory transmission were weak and would break hard-parts with any HP level over 300HP.
Even the A4 or 4L60E on our C5s can't handle anything over 350HP. Even the new C6 auto trans, the 4l65E, is rated to 400HP & 385 LBS.FT.
A trans should be able to handle at least 100HP/75 LBS.FT or torque OVER the stock HP of the engine. Why build something that can handle only the HP of the engine. That is walking a fine line between it breaking. Add some mods and BOOM, there goes the trans.
They really need to hire the transmission engineers from overseas. They can build better OD units.
St. Jude Donor '05-'06-'07-'08-'09-'10-'11-'12-'13-'14
I've had almost 500rwhp running through mine with no problems - and now circa 400rwhp with no problems. I shift like a **** and I drive it like I stole it. I almost never use Drive (except when I'm going past the police)
With a shiftkit, 160degree thermo and a Predator tune, it hasn't broken yet - 10 months and counting.
2005's are still building - don't let anyone tell you different - in fact they build through the 1st week of September - even though the 2006 Z06 start building on 7/25...(in limited numbers)
unless 2005 is a one-of-a-kind production year, then this guy is full of schit.
the next production year of Corvette always starts sometime in the first 2 weeks of July. But; current year models are still shippping to dealers - but that doesn't then equate to them "still being built"... just because there are some still in the pipeline - yet to make it on carriers/rail.
Unless... like I said earlier - that 2005 is a unique year.
Last edited by Mike Mercury; Jul 26, 2005 at 08:40 PM.
Designer Imagines A Corvette That Looks More Like a Corvette Than the Corvette
Slideshow: A Jaguar designer's personal project imagines what a modern front-engined Corvette might look like if Chevrolet revisited the golden age of the Stingray.