When you click on links to various merchants on this site and make a purchase, this can result in this site earning a commission. Affiliate programs and affiliations include, but are not limited to, the eBay Partner Network.
Does anybody know why the maximum instantaneous mpg is 99.0? I can understand them limiting it to 2 digits for space reasons on the dic, but why can't it go up to 99.9? And yes, I have seen 99.0 inst mpg as I'm going down a steep hill at over 70 mph in neutral. wheeeee!!!
On the c6, they dropped the decimal point from the inst mpg.
Because the only time you get 99+ mpg is coasting downhill at high speeds. This accounts for mabe .25% of an average person's driveing. Why would it need to go any higher?
Because he, like me, is an engineer and we like gadgets with lots of numbers.
GTC ... weren't you in Starkville at MSU? When did you move to Austin?
Yup. I moved from Starkville to Austin about 3 months ago. I went to MSU many years ago, but was working for a private company there for 11 years. It was going downhill, I needed to change companies, and I landed in Austin. So far, life has been good here.
The 99.0 just feels limiting when I logically see that there is plenty of space for it to go to 99.9. Now if it could have shown me that I was doing 124.8mpg, that would have been cool.
Because the only time you get 99+ mpg is coasting downhill at high speeds. This accounts for mabe .25% of an average person's driveing. Why would it need to go any higher?
OK then, as engineers you'd (I hope) want to result to be meaningful as well as accurate...
However, to use the example given of "I have seen 99.0 inst mpg as I'm going down a steep hill at over 70 mph in neutral. wheeeee!!!" I would ask you, is this the amount of fuel needed to move the vehicle over a distance one statute mile or the amount of fuel coincidentally burnt during the period the vehicle moved one mile through the action of other forces? If it's the latter, then you might as well turn off the engine and let the DIC display three cherries.
Yup. I moved from Starkville to Austin about 3 months ago. I went to MSU many years ago, but was working for a private company there for 11 years. It was going downhill, I needed to change companies, and I landed in Austin. So far, life has been good here.
Dang Gordon! You move as much as we do!
As a frequent flyer...oops, driver, I too spend some moments playing around with what I can do with the mileage....recently I set out to break 35 mpg on a 300 mile trip on an interstate between Knoxville and Columbus GA. In order to do that I had to stay in 6th at 78 mph, periodically coasting down a hill without cruise to "boost" my average .
Then on the same trip back, I used my wife's vette using the same theory but only got 30 mpg. So I wonder if I am travelling SOUTH, do I get better mileage...
MANY times I measured the trip back in the dark with headlights up...causing a reduction of 1.5 mpg on the same trip (though cooler air since I left at 3:00a).
Heck, I ran up and down my 1/4 street 30 times so I could stop in my garage to take pics when my pace car turned over 100k!
So yea, people with a lot of time spent in corvettes can think of the darndest things to do....
for your engineers...isn't the reason there isnt triple digit calculations is because of the chipset in the DIC? Doesn't it have a limited amount of numbers it can calculate?
for your engineers...isn't the reason there isnt triple digit calculations is because of the chipset in the DIC? Doesn't it have a limited amount of numbers it can calculate?
I realise that this has descended into the silly and, in fairness to RocketDawg, please don't forget I come from a country where the ;-) is often implied in our humour, but the number of digits displayed in 99.0 and 99.9 is actually the same. Stangkiller, you're probably thinking of accuracy or resolution but it's hardly relevant as that figure is not a true measure of what what is being discussed. Besides that, the DIC could display values greater than 99.0 with 4 characters (or three digits) or less using different number representations or notations.
I realise that this has descended into the silly and, in fairness to RocketDawg, please don't forget I come from a country where the ;-) is often implied in our humour, but the number of digits displayed in 99.0 and 99.9 is actually the same. Stangkiller, you're probably thinking of accuracy or resolution but it's hardly relevant as that figure is not a true measure of what what is being discussed. Besides that, the DIC could display values greater than 99.0 with 4 characters (or three digits) or less using different number representations or notations.
Hmm, there's something i was told the DIC couldn't do because of the chipset....guess it's not the MPG...i'll ask again tomorrow.