When you click on links to various merchants on this site and make a purchase, this can result in this site earning a commission. Affiliate programs and affiliations include, but are not limited to, the eBay Partner Network.
Some states (thinking California here) require the car maker to offer the owner the buy back if they can't fix a problem after X trips to the mechanic.
It could simply be that the previous owner saw the opportunity to get a new C5 and let GM buy the car back. Then maybe on the very next try they fixed it!
Could be. I had a lemon of a cd changer in my 2004. The dealer put in 3 different remfurbished changers which were junk too (one was DOA). Each time I asked for a brand new one. Finally, I mentioned that the car qualified for the lemon law if the 4th changer had troubles and that I wanted a new one. I did get a new one and no problems since. I seriously would have thought of moving up to a C6 for only losing a few k on my 04 after 36k miles later.
From: "It's 106 miles to Chicago, we've got a full tank of gas, half a pack of cigarettes, it's dark, and
St. Jude Donor '03-'04-'05-'06-'07-'08-'09-'10-'11-'12-'13-'14-'15-'16-'17-‘18-'19
NCM Sinkhole Donor
GM bought the car back because of the key fobs and a window problem?
I don't know - but that sounds like to me. I can't believe that they would buy a car back for that. The former owner must have been one gigantic P.I.T.A. and a whiner to convince GM that they had to refund his money over something that would not make the car undriveable.
If you are truly interested in this car - have Sponge Vette or someone run the car's VIN through the GM VIS for a service and origination report.
Chevy bought my 1996 Blazer back because of a paint problem. The car was mechanically sound. It would have been a good buy for someone who wanted a new car with a paint job.