Is a C6 a C5




Oh yes they are. I've seen them.
And I like them
... you sexy thing you.





Oh yes they are. I've seen them.
And I like them
... you sexy thing you. 
Do you think you're so tough that you have to call yourself a rogue? Are you trying to make us all feel bad because we don't wave?
How are you, Roger? You C5 Owner. You double C5 Owner. You double C5 and C3 Owner.
Do you think you are better than everyone else because you have three Corvettes?




Sorry ps374, don't mean to hijack your thread. To answer the original question... the C6 is an all new design.
The pizzing matches that break out on this forum never cease to amaze me. We're all Vette enthusiasts, are we not?





Sorry ps374, don't mean to hijack your thread. To answer the original question... the C6 is an all new design.







Before the C5, we had solid axles, mid years, sharks, and the infamous "wedge." Those were nicknames bestowed by "we, the people."
As I recall, the C designations were completely the product of the corporate minds at General Motors.

YOU are wrong.
I can see by all your assinine replies to this post that you will undoubtedly come back even again to say you are correct, BUT I am sorry Z51, The Corporate Minds at GM are not the ones that have given the Corvettes their generation nicknames or designations.
But then again, who the hell cares.
You really don't give up do you? You apparently think every thing you say, whether you actually know or just think you know what your talking about is fact......





YOU are wrong.
I can see by all your assinine replies to this post that you will undoubtedly come back even again to say you are correct, BUT I am sorry Z51, The Corporate Minds at GM are not the ones that have given the Corvettes their generation nicknames or designations.
But then again, who the hell cares.
You really don't give up do you? You apparently think every thing you say, whether you actually know or just think you know what your talking about is fact......

I chose the words "think" and "I recall" for a reason. It's not like you're a super genius who trapped me with my own words.
Please re-read what I said. I think you got it wrong.
And stop being argumentative, unless you want me to start insulting you, too.
Beyond that, there's no point in answering you.
The Best of Corvette for Corvette Enthusiasts



My panties are not in a wad - at all. I have no intention to cause friction. I didn't start anything. For your information, I stopped coming here a long time ago, because of all the nasty, insulting, borish people who frequent the place.
Otherwise you would analysis the C5 section as the sanest of sections
You don't need to tell me to let it go. If you had read my post, you'd have seen that was exactly what I said.
Hmmmm, comments like this make one wonder
Last edited by AC54ME; Dec 9, 2006 at 01:16 PM.





What we have here is a failure to communicate.....

RPOZ51 was just having fun with someone he knows - if you id not read the whole thread you may have jumped to the conclusion that this was a serious argument -
Anyway - IT is my opinion that the generational changes that GM does are always done to sell more cars and enhance the image of the Corvette.
History shows us that most often the generation change is precipitated by a relatively major change in the exterior appearance, without regard necessarily to mechanical revisions.
The one obvious exception was the change from c1 to c2, where the car had a major body revision in 1955 yet still remained in the nomenclature a c1. C2's were identified by a mechanical revision - hence many called the c1 a "solid axle".
best regards -
mqqn





Otherwise you would analysis the C5 section as the sanest of sections

- Coupes v Convertibles
- Millenium Yellow v Velocity Yellow
- Stick v automatic
- should I get Museum Delivery?
The pics posted here of my car were taken the day I picked it up. About 25 Forum members caravanned me down to the dealership. The next day, I posted about what a wonderful experience it had been. A guy was all offended that I would imply that my experience was any better than his museum pick up. Absolutely cuckoo.
It has honestly been my experience that there is more of an edge here in C5 Gen, though.


Alex takes every opportunity to call my car a C5.2, and I tell him his car is really a C4, because of the 1967 to 1968 thing. It's a rolling joke between us.
Most of my early posts here were with tongue firmly planted in cheek. I wasn't expecting a thread entitled, "Is a C6 a C5" to be a very serious conversation. I truly love the C5, and did not come here to start an argument. (I still believe the "C" designation was started by GM, though)

Are you saying that from experience?
Obviously, you guys are sensitive about this stuff. I'll make all your lives easier, and stay in the CFNE where I belong.
Sorry if I offended anyone. Well, almost anyone.

Enjoy your great cars!





What we have here is a failure to communicate.....

RPOZ51 was just having fun with someone he knows - if you id not read the whole thread you may have jumped to the conclusion that this was a serious argument -
Anyway - IT is my opinion that the generational changes that GM does are always done to sell more cars and enhance the image of the Corvette.
History shows us that most often the generation change is precipitated by a relatively major change in the exterior appearance, without regard necessarily to mechanical revisions.
The one obvious exception was the change from c1 to c2, where the car had a major body revision in 1955 yet still remained in the nomenclature a c1. C2's were identified by a mechanical revision - hence many called the c1 a "solid axle".
best regards -
mqqn
You guys are welcome to come over to the CFNE and have a drink in our bar thread. Link to Current Bar Thread.
I'm buying.






