When you click on links to various merchants on this site and make a purchase, this can result in this site earning a commission. Affiliate programs and affiliations include, but are not limited to, the eBay Partner Network.
I've noticed several aftermarket companies imprint "350 cubic inches"on nameplates for underhood and for the dash. It's a "346", not a "350". They are different engines.
350 is marketing and that sells cars. Like you drive torque, but sell horsepower..... so I could never understand why chevrolet originally listed the LS1 at 345 hp.
^ People are stupid.... they like the 350 "ring" even though it's a 346. Me... I'd never put any sort of "350" badging on mine.
Just like a 302 is really a 4.9.... but 5.0 sounds way cooler.
To me, 346" is way er than 350". It distinguishes the LS1/6 as an advanced tech engine when compared to the old 350".
I thought about getting one, but couldn't find one with 346 on it. One even stated "TPI" instead of "SFI". And, being sold by some Forum vendors. Seems like they would know better.
I predict this thread turns gnarly in two more posts or less now that we've started talking about things measured in inches that aren't really the size claimed, like 1" iron pipe isn't one inch, etc.
From: Southern New Jersey, The wet part at the bottom
St. Jude Donor '08-'09-'10
I'll jump on this "wagon" with this fact on over bored 283s in the day were called 301s, in '69 GM built a factory 302 that was the same bore and stroke. Both engines were actually 301.7 cubes.
Been going on for years with quite a few car manufacturers.
I don't recall seeing anywhere that Chevrolet/GM refers to the LS1/6 as 350". Always 346" or 5.7L. Only in the aftermarket have I seen 350", or by some people, erroneously.
From: Dear Karma, I have a list of people you missed.
St. Jude Donor '08-'09-'10-'11-'12-'13-'14-'15-'16
Originally Posted by 2KFRC5
I don't recall seeing anywhere that Chevrolet/GM refers to the LS1/6 as 350". Always 346" or 5.7L. Only in the aftermarket have I seen 350", or by some people, erroneously.
Seems to be less common in the metric days, but if you'll go back and look in the 60s, 70's, etc. you'll see it much more. Usually just "rounding" to the next even number. The motorcycle companies did it too.
Designer Imagines A Corvette That Looks More Like a Corvette Than the Corvette
Slideshow: A Jaguar designer's personal project imagines what a modern front-engined Corvette might look like if Chevrolet revisited the golden age of the Stingray.