When you click on links to various merchants on this site and make a purchase, this can result in this site earning a commission. Affiliate programs and affiliations include, but are not limited to, the eBay Partner Network.
Ive heard both ways about 4.10 gears. Ive heard some people say that the wheels are actually spinning slower so off the line you should get better traction. Then ive heard some people say thats totally bogus and that the wheels are spinning way faster than stock so traction will be horrible. Which is it? I would really like to know and i know people on here can help.
A smaller gear turns faster than a larger gear.
3.42 < 4.10
For every 3.42 rotations of the driveshaft, the wheels will rotate one time with a 3.42 gear
For every 4.10 rotations of the driveshaft, the wheels will rotate one time with a 4.10 gear.
However, the engine requires more effort to turn a larger gear. Perhaps with an underpowered car you could see "better traction" because it didn't have the power to break it loose... but was faster because it moved through the gears quicker.
With the corvette's power, even stock, you should be breaking traction far easier with 4.10s than with 3.42s. So as far as better traction with the corvette? No, I doubt it. But the in either case, the vehicle is faster in the low end with the 4.10
Last edited by DefenderC5; Aug 2, 2007 at 11:33 PM.
For every one rotation of the driveshaft, the wheels will rotate 3.42 times with a 3.42 gear
For every one rotation of the driveshaft, the wheels will rotate 4.10 times with a 4.10 gear. So as you can see, larger gear turns faster.
Ummm, don't you have this backwards? i.e., shouldn't this be: for every 3.42 rotations of the driveshaft, the wheels turn once?
With your example of the two gear sets, you would expect a higher top speed with the lower (4.10) gears, since you would be traveling farther with each revolution of the driveshaft - but we know it doesn't work that way....
[QUOTE=wamara;1561335889]Ummm, don't you have this backwards? i.e., shouldn't this be: for every 3.42 rotations of the driveshaft, the wheels turn once?
With your example of the two gear sets, you would expect a higher top speed with the lower (4.10) gears, since you would be traveling farther with each revolution of the driveshaft - but we know it doesn't work that way....[/QUOTE]
You are correct! The engine will be turning a higher RPM with 4.10's than 3.42's.....thus the drive shaft is as well, but the wheels turn at a slower RPM.
However, the engine requires more effort to turn a larger gear. Perhaps with an underpowered car you could see "better traction" because it didn't have the power to break it loose... but was faster because it moved through the gears quicker.
With the corvette's power, even stock, you should be breaking traction far easier with 4.10s than with 3.42s. So as far as better traction with the corvette? No, I doubt it. But the in either case, the vehicle is faster in the low end with the 4.10
Ummm, don't you have this backwards? i.e., shouldn't this be: for every 3.42 rotations of the driveshaft, the wheels turn once?
With your example of the two gear sets, you would expect a higher top speed with the lower (4.10) gears, since you would be traveling farther with each revolution of the driveshaft - but we know it doesn't work that way....
Duh, yes you're right. I wrote this one on a lunch break and didn't proof read Fixed for ya
He must be an unsure and carefuly customer. He should find somebody near him wth the gears to take him for a ride. To bad your not in NJ. I'd show you how traction limited they can be.
It's like any other power adder mod. You have to learn how to use it. 4.10's are the sh**, I run them in my 600+ rwhp procharged Z and yes it spins less. The car takes less power to get moving quicker from a dig, and from a roll it's just insane.
From: Marlton. Increasing performance one speeding ticket at a time! NJ
Originally Posted by DefenderC5
However, the engine requires more effort to turn a larger gear.
Gears don't put any additional strain on the engine, other than the fact that at the same speed, the RPM's will be higher. If that's what you mean, than I agree.
Using the 3.42->4.10 analogy, the wheels on the 4.10 car will spin aprrox 20% slower, but the torque at the wheels will have increased 20%. Since the tire diameter is staying the same, the force applied between the road and the tread will also increase by 20%. This translates into decreased traction, any way you look at it.
It's like any other power adder mod. You have to learn how to use it.
ding... ding... ding, we have a winner !
you take a person that doesn't have the natural born-with talent to begin with (I am one of them)... then add incredible amounts of increased rear wheel thrust... and it becomes more an embarrassment than a race winner.
Be careful what you wish for... traction does not remain a constant.
If you want traction get a 2.73 rear. You'll have lots of traction but it will be a DOG. I run 3.90's w/ 500 to the wheels and it's perfect. I have great traction in 4th, 5th and 6th gear.
Another way to explain it...off the line, the engine's rpm will rise faster with the 4.10's, thus getting into the engine's power band quicker, thus putting more power to the ground quicker, thus making it easier to lose traction!