When you click on links to various merchants on this site and make a purchase, this can result in this site earning a commission. Affiliate programs and affiliations include, but are not limited to, the eBay Partner Network.
Also, are there really such things as radar jammers?
I rarely speed (NO, REALLY), but I don't always pay attention to the thousands of road signs either.
honestly, you don't want a cordless detector. they are junk! there is not enough power to pickup good signal and properly process the data it does receive.
radar jammers are real. all modern fighers and bombers have them. can you get one for your car that works? no.
i understand about the damn road signs. you never know how fast to drive thru podunk pick'yo'state.
best advice i can give is to keep pace if you don't know.
I have the Solo 2 also, I bought it for the bike but use it in the car also works great. I bought a cord for it to use on long trips so I don't have to worry about batterys going bad. I have used it for about 5 yrs no problems at all and has saved me many times
honestly, you don't want a cordless detector. they are junk! there is not enough power to pickup good signal and properly process the data it does receive.
radar jammers are real. all modern fighers and bombers have them. can you get one for your car that works? no.
i understand about the damn road signs. you never know how fast to drive thru podunk pick'yo'state.
best advice i can give is to keep pace if you don't know.
When I was looking for a detector, I initially looked for a cordless one. Until I found out that most of them reserve battery power by "turning off" periodically. Now, they only do this for very small amounts of time (milliseconds I believe) but I don't like that "feature". Go wired! The Valentine I bought comes with a wiring kit and I'm sure others do too.
I have the Solo S2 as well. The only issue I've found is I wish the bracket dropped the unit a little lower so it doesn't bounce on the windshield over bumps or rough roads.
Other than that I've had it a little over a year and it seems to work very well.
Go with a wired detector. Valentine One seems to be the preferred model from what I have read in both the C4 and C5 sections and you can get it upgraded by the company as new radar units come out. It's pricey but they do work. Escort is the next best choice for a wired detector.
As far as jammers, they are out there, but there are many states that have laws against them. Most don't work that well and there is no real defense against laser (although there are supposed to be laser jammers). The WSP bike troopers use laser exclusively. Many WSP cars have laser as do county sheriffs and many city cops. And those WSP biker guys are really hard to spot next to the overpasses or shrubs along I-5
The best cordless radar detector is the Escort Solo S2. That being said, it isn't worth the money and it is really bad compared to the best corded models like the Valentine One. Look how bad it did at the latest independent radar detector test.
I had one of the original Escort cordless detectors way back when. Loved it. It was fanstatic. But it finally died. Looked at what was available at that time and decided to go with the V1.
St. Jude Donor '05-'06-'07-'08-'09-'10-'11-'12-'13-'14-'15-'16-'17
Over four years on my Escort Solo S2 and I would buy it again in a heartbeat. I haven't had any experience with other cordless detectors, but I do know the tests and trials place the Solo S2 above any other cordless.
First of all, Radartest.com is run by a guy named Craig Peterson who works for Bel and Escort so he bashes the V1 every chance he gets and promotes Bel and Escort products. He got busted trying to sabotage the Guysoflidar.com 2007 radar detector test and he will probably have to part with a couple thousand dollars on top of the $1000 radar gun that he hid under camouflauge on top of a mountain to throw off the testing.
Do you really want to believe the Autoweek reviews on radar detectors when the reviewers describe themselves like this, "Most of us ventured into this review of the latest radar detectors as near novices; only a few of our dozen test drivers had experience with radar detectors that they would call extensive."
Actually, I believe in real life performance, not what someone espouses. Albeit "knock on wood for good luck" but I've traveled a good chunk of the country and all my daily driving and every time it goes off it never fails me. No stops or tickets with my S2. So it must be doing something well.
But then I'm probably like most drivers who will do +5 in some areas and maybe up to +10 on the interstates. Very easy to get within the limit when the detector blips.
While the wireless vs wired merits/disadvantages can be debated when it comes to sensitivity, range, ease of use, looks, etc the ONE item where wireless units fall completely short is on POP detection. Its the one feature they had to do without in order to have the ability to conserve battery power.
For some POP isnt as big a deal as having no ugly wires or multiple wires for multiple cars...really comes down to personal preferece: looks vs. enhanced functionality
Why go wireless in the first place? There are nice brackets to mount the detector up out of the way where you can tap into mirror-power.
As for wireless effectiveness, they work OK, but as Mike Valentine said, he wouldn't sell one simply because they won't work as good as a corded model. The man designed Escort detectors for years, then went on to establish his own company making the V1, which most people acknowledge as the finest unit on the market. He knows his stuff!