C5 over C3

I'm toying with the idea of selling the '81 and buying an '02
Has anyone else done that? Any regrets? No, I cannot keep both.
I bought a C-5 new in June of '01, so I think I can make some valid comparisons. First, the interior room is so much greater in the C-5. As a "car guy" all my life, I always was drawn to 'Vettes. But as I topped out at 6'2" tall, C-2s and 3s didn't have the room for me, so I never considered buying one for myself. The C-5 easily solved the space problem, so that was why I initially considered one.
My wife always made an issue of having fully functional air conditioning. She spent a TON of money on trying to keep the A/C working on her '79. It seemed to need a continuous flow of $$. My C-5 has been flawless.
The C-3 rode like a truck. Several years before we sold it, I went through the suspension COMPLETELY. New poly bushings everywhere, new coils in front, and most importantly, a fiberglass spring in the rear, as well as gas shocks all around. That improved the ride TREMENDOUSLY, but it was still a tad rough. By comparison, the C-5, even though I've lowered it, rides like a Cadillac, and the handling isn't even in the same universe. Keep in mind, the C-2 and 3s suspension was designed in the late 50s, in preparation to be introduced in the fall of '62, for the '63 Sting Rays.
Straight line performance (and, surprisingly, fuel economy).....Need to ask???
Hope this helps.......
KEEP YOUR C3
It will be a lot easier to get a C5 then a nice C3.
Last edited by Robletto; Aug 27, 2008 at 06:46 AM.
The Best of Corvette for Corvette Enthusiasts
It does however have no storage space for luggage compared to the C5 and it is pretty crowded to sit in and drive compared to the C5. I imagine the A/C in the newer car works better, but I don't use the air in either one because if I'm driving the top is down or off. The C3 and C5 are just different cars. The C3 is a classic style that gets noticed, the C5 is just another car on the road. Both are fun in their own way, but I think you see which one gets my vote. 
Now bring on the verbal assault guys.
-Justin
with everyone.I too sold my 74 stingray for a 99 C5. While I do agree the C3 is more of a head turner, I have not regretted the decision. The handling and suspension is much nicer on the C5, More interior and cargo space, better gas mileage (if that matters to you). and you dont have to worry as much about breaking down on those long trips. Just a better vehicle all around.
I say go for it.
Last edited by brntstauf; Aug 27, 2008 at 08:15 AM.
My '71 is a REAL head turner, a classic Stingray/ Mako Shark shape. It has a distinctive rumble. It also squeeks and rattles, my feet stay HOT, has NO storage space, and is not the greatest handling car; also 12MPG.
My '04 gets noticed, too. It's super off the line. It's quiet, the A/C works great; quiet and comfortable ride. Great mileage (24 around town) and easy for me (6foot4) to get into (my daily driver).
depends what you're looking for, I guess. I'm keeping both and I'm a happy camper.
I just love driving a car with a carburator and I don't know which one I'd sell if I had to. To me both cars handle very well on the highway and are both comfortable . I hope I never have to choose between the two.
Last edited by Crab; Aug 27, 2008 at 09:31 AM.
The C5 looks like a classic update to the '69 lines - which I don't think the C4 did. It's got all the C3 styling cues that I loved...not quite as "Coke bottle" from above...but just beautiful lines.
As for the C5 as a performance car, it's more than I ever aspired to with my C3. I was considering an LS swap, T56, massive suspension changes, etc....but I got all that "free" with my C5. It's a riot to drive - smooth, comfortable and downright nasty past 3,000 RPM.
I will always have a soft spot for the '69...but I think Zora would be very happy with the C5, as am I.
The C6 is...another matter - but that's not the question in this thread
























