10% Ethanol Fuel
I have seen a consistent 2 mpg lower fuel economy during those months, but no driveability issues. Probably a little less performance (though I hear Ethanol has higher octane, so if someone is more versed in this than me, please jump in!)
We see it as a small price to pay for cleaner air in the winter when we get significant temperature inversions that trap smog in the basins where Colorado Springs and Denver sit.

http://www.evworld.com/article.cfm?storyid=1217
Now you can get off your soapbox once and for all.
"The energy of ethanol relative to gasoline
A. 76,000 = BTU of energy in a gallon of ethanol
B. 116,090 = BTU of energy in a gallon of gasoline
C. .655 = 2/3 = GGE of energy in a gallon of ethanol. A / B.
D. 1.53 = Gallons of ethanol with the energy of 1 gallon of gasoline. D = B / A."
This is the only reason you see less mileage. Read it, it doesnt matter how you make it, ethanol does not have the same energy that a gallon of gas has, if you get off your rant and silly liberal thinking you have to accept the fact. This is the same crap you liberals put out about nuclear power since three mile island and now all of a sudden, Nukes are good.
For the record, you can stop using energy in this United States and the earth is doomed by the cesspools of China, India, and Russia and other Kyoto accord set a sides. That is why Bush and Clinton didn't ratify the treaty.
I sponsored an IMCA dirt car and built motors for several other cars. Running 100% alcohol, mechanical compression ratios could be bumped well above pump gasoline. 12 to 1 and above and more timing possible. But, carb jet size would have to almost doubled and high volume fuel pumps used. Pure alcohol leads to corrosion problems in a very short time.
if alcohol has only half the efficiency btu wise as gasoline, wouldn't a 10% mixture only have a potential performance loss of 5%?
as far as alcohol "absorbing" water..... nope. alcohol beaks down the surface tension of the water molecules, dispersing them throughout the gasoline instead of large puddles floating around in the tank.
Individual experiences may vary,..............he sees what is happening in the industry from an inside view,........he has access to resources we can only dream of.
Have a look,......check out the Corvette section........he is a long time Corvette nut. Oh and Liddy's Lingenfelder ZR1.
http://www.mpt.org/motorweek/goss/
They pumped raw waste and industrial waste directly into the rivers..............being green cost money and they are putting economic expansion over environment.
As stated the US and other dids this in the 40s,50s, 60s and part of the 70s..........but there was very little understanding of the impact it had on the environment and no technology to deal with it................now days there is no excuse.
The Best of Corvette for Corvette Enthusiasts
He now supports Nitrogen in tires, I know this has been debated to Death, but he know supports NitroFill Inflation Services.
One of the thing i thought was funny is the Tour De France uses Nitrogen also. What ever!
http://www.goss-garage.com/node/32






And after all..... they're Corvette's. Don't they deserve the best?

How about a study done by people with some real credentials (University of North Dakota and University of Minnesota) as reported by Motor Trend (at least most of us have heard of Motor trend as opposed to the "rag" you linked).
http://www.motortrend.com/features/n...057/index.html
A very interesting statement from their report is, "The University of North Dakota Energy & Environmental Research Center (EERC) and the Minnesota Center for Automotive Research (MnCAR) conducted the research using four 2007 model vehicles: a Toyota Camry, a Ford Fusion and two Chevrolet Impalas, one flex-fuel and one non-flex-fuel. Researchers used the EPA Highway Fuel Economy Test (HWFET) to examine a range of ethanol-gasoline blends from straight Tier 2 gasoline up to 85 percent ethanol. All of the vehicles got better mileage with ethanol blends than the ethanol's energy content would predict, and three out of four actually traveled farther on a mid-level ethanol blend than on unleaded gasoline.
You need to come in out of the rain---it's starting to hail. And my soap box is under a good, strong roof!!
"The energy of ethanol relative to gasoline
A. 76,000 = BTU of energy in a gallon of ethanol
B. 116,090 = BTU of energy in a gallon of gasoline
C. .655 = 2/3 = GGE of energy in a gallon of ethanol. A / B.
D. 1.53 = Gallons of ethanol with the energy of 1 gallon of gasoline. D = B / A."
This is the only reason you see less mileage. Read it, it doesnt matter how you make it, ethanol does not have the same energy that a gallon of gas has, if you get off your rant and silly liberal thinking you have to accept the fact. This is the same crap you liberals put out about nuclear power since three mile island and now all of a sudden, Nukes are good.
For the record, you can stop using energy in this United States and the earth is doomed by the cesspools of China, India, and Russia and other Kyoto accord set a sides. That is why Bush and Clinton didn't ratify the treaty.
He now supports Nitrogen in tires, I know this has been debated to Death, but he know supports NitroFill Inflation Services.
One of the thing i thought was funny is the Tour De France uses Nitrogen also. What ever!
http://www.goss-garage.com/node/32















