When you click on links to various merchants on this site and make a purchase, this can result in this site earning a commission. Affiliate programs and affiliations include, but are not limited to, the eBay Partner Network.
First I would go down and speak to your neighbors. First start by apologizing. Then tell them the entire story of what happened and offer to pay for the damage to the lawn. The tickets may have come from them and if so they can dismiss them. The officer was not there and can not issue you a ticket for something he did not witness. So the neighbors are his witness. If they will not hear you out or don't what to help to dismiss the tickets. GET A LAWYER and fight the tickets. If there is no witness to prove you spun out then its your word against theirs. And if it comes down to that screw them & their lawn. Good luck.
From: Dear Karma, I have a list of people you missed.
St. Jude Donor '08-'09-'10-'11-'12-'13-'14-'15-'16
Originally Posted by Jims79
First I would go down and speak to your neighbors. First start by apologizing. Then tell them the entire story of what happened and offer to pay for the damage to the lawn. The tickets may have come from them and if so they can dismiss them. The officer was not there and can not issue you a ticket for something he did not witness. So the neighbors are his witness. If they will not hear you out or don't what to help to dismiss the tickets. GET A LAWYER and fight the tickets. If there is no witness to prove you spun out then its your word against theirs. And if it comes down to that screw them & their lawn. Good luck.
Good intentions, but you have some of your facts wrong. The tickets DON'T come from the neighbors (or any other citizen). They come from the LEO. Period. The LEO CAN and DID issue the tickets without being present at the alleged offense and can lawfully do so. The LEO does however, as you say, need the neighbor(s) ("complaining witness") in order to successfully make the case on at least one or two of those cases he filed.
If the witnesses don't/can't show up in court, then at least one or two of the tickets will go away; maybe all. Depends on the prosecutor since HE is the one that actually has to present (and prove) the case to the court, not the LEO. The LEO is the prosecutor's "States witness" in the matter, nothing more.
To the OP: An attorney can explain all this to you in more detail and as been recommended, you need to retain one.
Thanks for all of the help. I will definetly get an attorney and see what he can do. I will also attempt to go and talk to them one more time to see if we can talk something out. I know I should have left a note or something it was a bad move on my part.
Thanks
Mark
From: Dear Karma, I have a list of people you missed.
St. Jude Donor '08-'09-'10-'11-'12-'13-'14-'15-'16
Originally Posted by Mark2ooo
Thanks for all of the help. I will definetly get an attorney and see what he can do. I will also attempt to go and talk to them one more time to see if we can talk something out. I know I should have left a note or something it was a bad move on my part.
Thanks
Mark
I would seek advice from your attorney before attempting to contact your neighbor again. See what he thinks.
First I would go down and speak to your neighbors. First start by apologizing. Then tell them the entire story of what happened and offer to pay for the damage to the lawn. The tickets may have come from them and if so they can dismiss them. The officer was not there and can not issue you a ticket for something he did not witness. So the neighbors are his witness. If they will not hear you out or don't what to help to dismiss the tickets. GET A LAWYER and fight the tickets. If there is no witness to prove you spun out then its your word against theirs. And if it comes down to that screw them & their lawn. Good luck.
The first part of your suggestion was solid common sense.
The bold part is inaccurate with traffic collision investigations. The neighbors obviously can be witnesses and called to testify. That is why I suggested in my previous reply that the case was probably submitted to the city prosecutor for review of charges and the complaints came in the mail. The complaints can also be filed directly through the court with information supplied to the judge. It's called probable cause.
The original poster knows he made a mistake. I don't understand the suggestions that he should try to evade any responsibility.
What if the damage occurred to your property?
2025 C8 Z06/7/E-Ray of the Year Finalist - Unmodified
2023 C3 of the Year Finalist - Unmodified
2021 C8 of the Year Finalist Unmodified
2020 Corvette of the Year Finalist (performance mods)
2019 C1 of Year Winner (performance mods)
2017 Corvette of the Year Finalist
2016 C2 of Year
2015 C3 of Year Finalist
Originally Posted by 2000C-5
First, the LEO had no business writing any tickets since he did not witness the event.
Second, the right thing to do would have been for the LEO to have gotten all parties together after hearing that the OP had every intention of talking to the neighbors at a more appropriate time. That would have been the end of it.
If police officers had to witness criminal activity to lodge charges there would be very few situations where they could take action. Probable cause and witnesses are what make up the vast majority of criminal cases.
Corvette Stories
The Best of Corvette for Corvette Enthusiasts
10 Ugly Corvettes That We Still Kinda Love
Joe Kucinski
Top 10 Most Expensive Corvettes Ever Sold on Bring A Trailer
Brett Foote
10 Things Every Corvette Owner Needs (2026 Edition)
Michael S. Palmer
8 Most "Only Corvette Owners Understand" Quirks and Problems
Pouria Savadkouei
10 Reasons the C6 Z06 is Still A Performance Benchmark After 20 Years
Joe Kucinski
How Much Horsepower Every Corvette Engine "LOST" in 1972
Joe Kucinski
Top 10 DOs and DON'Ts for Protecting Your Convertible Top!
Michael S. Palmer
Top 10 Most Explosive Corvettes Ever Made: Power-to-Weight Ratio Ranked!
Joe Kucinski
150 hp to 1,250 hp: Every Corvette Generation Compared by the Specs That Matter
Joe Kucinski
8 Coolest Corvette Pace Cars (and Replicas) of All Time
From: Dear Karma, I have a list of people you missed.
St. Jude Donor '08-'09-'10-'11-'12-'13-'14-'15-'16
Originally Posted by hotwheels57
The first part of your suggestion was solid common sense.
The bold part is inaccurate with traffic collision investigations. The neighbors obviously can be witnesses and called to testify. That is why I suggested in my previous reply that the case was probably submitted to the city prosecutor for review of charges and the complaints came in the mail. The complaints can also be filed directly through the court with information supplied to the judge. It's called probable cause.
The original poster knows he made a mistake. I don't understand the suggestions that he should try to evade any responsibility.
What if the damage occurred to your property?
I don't see him evading his responsibility to the neighbor. What I see him doing is avoiding a LEO's "shotgun" approach to writing him so many tickets. You know what I mean. Write a bunch and see what sticks. Driving a tack with a sledgehammer, I mean...c'mon. The guy was a moron for doing that. If he's going to let his emotions affect how he does his job, he doesn't need to be wearing a badge.
From: Dear Karma, I have a list of people you missed.
St. Jude Donor '08-'09-'10-'11-'12-'13-'14-'15-'16
Originally Posted by capevettes
If police officers had to witness criminal activity to lodge charges there would be very few situations where they could take action. Probable cause and witnesses are what make up the vast majority of criminal cases.
Fair statement. If witnesses can't/don't/won't show up in court, the vast majority of them get dismissed too.
Sad thing is that if you were rich you could actually commit murder and get less of a penalty. I can't imagine ever calling the police if a neighbor accidentally did a little damage to my yard. I'm assuming they knew it was an accident if they saw you. On top of it you get a cop that sounds like a real A-hole. There are plenty of good police officers out there, but there are also plenty of ego driven, power hungry idiots that would love to rag on some Corvette owner. Too bad they don't have anything more important to worry about
Best of luck dealing with all of the A-holes in this world.
I'm wondering who's going to testify against you. The police officer didn't see you drive on your neighbor's yard, so how can he say that you were driving recklessly? He can write the citations based upon what he was told by your neighbors, who I assume observed you. If they don't appear in court, I'd think you'd be okay. Good luck.
Last edited by DevilDog II; Jan 3, 2009 at 06:41 PM.
From: Dear Karma, I have a list of people you missed.
St. Jude Donor '08-'09-'10-'11-'12-'13-'14-'15-'16
Originally Posted by DevilDog II
I'm wondering who's going to testify against you. The police officer didn't see you drive on your neighbor's yard, so how can he say that you were driving recklessly? He can write the citations based upon what he was told by your neighbors, who I assume observed you. If they don't appear in court, I'd think you'd be okay. Good luck.
I thought of that too except for that little "res gestae" thing. If I were to guess, I would say the OP probably spilled the beans to the LEO as he seems like a pretty honest straightforward guy. Don't know if the prosecutor would go with just that for "evidence" by itself or not. As a practical matter, I suspect you are right though.
Find a good lawyer and he won't be cheap. Jump thru the hoops
and you will have another lesson in life.
Just think none of this would of happened if you had........(fill in
the blanks). Good luck and good bye.
Find a good lawyer and he won't be cheap. Jump thru the hoops
and you will have another lesson in life.
Just think none of this would of happened if you had........(fill in
the blanks). Good luck and good bye.
As a retired police officer, I agree with some of what you said. Obviously, the OP was driving too fast because he lost control of his vehicle. I could possibly see a ticket for Driving Too Fast For Conditions, but Reckless Driving, Speeding, Leaving the Scene of an Accident, and Damage to Property seem a bit much. Excessive speed alone does not constitute Reckless Driving here in Illinois.
I can understand his logic in not wanting to wake them up at such an early hour to advise them of the damage. He should have probably left a note indicating what he had done and that he would contact them later in the day. I'm curious if he's had driving related problems with them before. It just seems like a lot of tickets for something so minor.
If police officers had to witness criminal activity to lodge charges there would be very few situations where they could take action. Probable cause and witnesses are what make up the vast majority of criminal cases.
No, that's what forensic evidence is for. It has long been established that eye witness evidence is grossly inaccurate.
I thought of that too except for that little "res gestae" thing. If I were to guess, I would say the OP probably spilled the beans to the LEO as he seems like a pretty honest straightforward guy. Don't know if the prosecutor would go with just that for "evidence" by itself or not. As a practical matter, I suspect you are right though.
When the cop came I did not deny doing the damage I told him that I planned on going down to them later. I feel I am responsible for the damage that I did. I just do not feel that I should lose my license over such a minor incadent.
Originally Posted by road pilot
Find a good lawyer and he won't be cheap. Jump thru the hoops
and you will have another lesson in life.
Just think none of this would of happened if you had........(fill in
the blanks). Good luck and good bye.
Thanks unfortunately this mistake is going to cost me a lot more $ then your average mistake.
Originally Posted by DevilDog II
As a retired police officer, I agree with some of what you said. Obviously, the OP was driving too fast because he lost control of his vehicle. I could possibly see a ticket for Driving Too Fast For Conditions, but Reckless Driving, Speeding, Leaving the Scene of an Accident, and Damage to Property seem a bit much. Excessive speed alone does not constitute Reckless Driving here in Illinois.
I can understand his logic in not wanting to wake them up at such an early hour to advise them of the damage. He should have probably left a note indicating what he had done and that he would contact them later in the day. I'm curious if he's had driving related problems with them before. It just seems like a lot of tickets for something so minor.
No other problems with these people they just moved in not to long ago.